On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:01:52 -0700, Gnarlodious wrote:
> On Oct 22, 6:41 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
>
>> The line `someList = self._someList` does NOT copy the list. It make
>> `someList` point to the same existing list object.
> Thanks for all those explanations, I've already fixed it with a tuple
Thank you for the good trick for a static class owned property. Someone
might object this but this is really useful.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Oct 22, 10:51 pm, SigmundV wrote:
> On Oct 22, 6:32 am, Steven D'Aprano
> +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>
> > Sure. But the downside of sets is that, like lists, they are not lazy,
>
> Thank you for pointing this out. I agree that it's not a viable
> alternative for large domains. St
Hi all,
Where does PyExc_TypeError (and alike) points to? I can see its
declaration - PyAPI_DATA(PyObject *) PyExc_TypeError; - in pyerrors.h
but I cannot figure out what it is its value, where it is
initialized.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Lee
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
On Oct 22, 6:41 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> The line `someList = self._someList` does NOT copy the list. It make
> `someList` point to the same existing list object.
Thanks for all those explanations, I've already fixed it with a tuple.
Which is more reliable anyway.
-- Gnarlie
--
http://mail.pyt
On 23/10/2011 01:26, Gnarlodious wrote:
Say this:
class tester():
_someList = [0, 1]
def __call__(self):
someList = self._someList
someList += "X"
return someList
test = tester()
But guess what, every call adds to the variable tha
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Gnarlodious wrote:
> Say this:
>
> class tester():
Style note: either have it explicitly subclass `object`, or don't
include the parens at all. Empty parens for the superclasses is just
weird.
> _someList = [0, 1]
> def __call__(self):
>
Say this:
class tester():
_someList = [0, 1]
def __call__(self):
someList = self._someList
someList += "X"
return someList
test = tester()
But guess what, every call adds to the variable that I am trying to
copy each time:
test()
>
Can anyone recommend a good book to learn the web programming aspects
of Python 3?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Oct 22, 6:32 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> Sure. But the downside of sets is that, like lists, they are not lazy,
Thank you for pointing this out. I agree that it's not a viable
alternative for large domains. Storing the bounds and the resolution
should be enough.
/Sigmund
--
http://mail.py
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:16:47 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2:51 pm, X1 wrote:
>>
>> easy_install does not exist on Fedora.
>
> That's a pure lie.
Rather than assume malice, we should give X1 the benefit of the doubt and
assume he genuinely believed what he wrote but was merely mistaken.
On Oct 8, 2:51 pm, X1 wrote:
easy_install does not exist on Fedora.
That's a pure lie.
mitmanek:~ $ sudo repoquery -qf /usr/bin/easy_install
python-setuptools-0:0.6.10-3.el6.noarch
mitmanek:~ $
Matěj
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:32:44 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:42:16 -0700, SigmundV wrote:
>
>> On Oct 21, 2:55 am, Yingjie Lan wrote:
>>>
>>> In simulation, one can use range objects to denote a discrete domain,
>>> and domain comparison could be very useful. Not just equa
I was about to submit a bug report, but while testing I have figured out
that my specific problem has been solved in Python 2.7 (server that I
was using had 2.6 on it). You can see the differences here:
2.6: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/b9a95ce2692c/Lib/shutil.py
2.7: http://hg.python.org
In response to an issue (#13235) raised on the Python bug tracker, I'm going to
deprecate the warn() methods in the Logger and LoggerAdapter classes in the
stdlib logging package, as well the module-level warn() function.
The warn() variants were synonyms for the warning() methods and function, an
On Thursday, October 20, 2011 6:23:50 AM UTC-7, Yingjie Lan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems a generator expression can be used only once:
>
> >>> g = (x*x for x in range(3))
> >>> for x in g: print x
> 0
> 1
> 4
> >>> for x in g: print x #nothing printed
> >>>
>
> Is there any way to revive g here?
R
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:13:06 -0500, David Hoese wrote:
> So I guess what I'm asking is what are the reasons that _destinsrc uses
> abspath instead of realpath? And is there a better place to ask this?
Probably because abspath goes back to Python 1.5, while realpath is
comparatively recent only
David Hoese wrote:
> I wasn't really sure where to post this since the python-dev list seems
> way too official. I'm wondering/questioning the behavior of
> shutil.move. It currently does a check for if the dst is inside the src
> directory with a _destinsrc function. This function uses
> os.pa
18 matches
Mail list logo
