On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:03:54 +0300, _ wrote:
> # THAT WHAT NEED EXPECT FROM OPERATORS OF PYTHON: Worddr = "56" # CREATE
> A STRING: "56" Word = ["12"] # CREATE A LIST WITH ONE SIGNED: "12" Word
> = Word.append("34")
...
Do you have a question, or are you just dumping a lot of noise in one
post
On Jan 16, 4:03 pm, "_" wrote:
> # THAT WHAT NEED EXPECT FROM OPERATORS OF PYTHON:
> Word = Word.append("34") # APPEND TO LIST ONE MORE SIGNED: "34"
list.append is an in-place operation; it doesn't return a copy of the
list, so here you're setting Word to None.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/
On Jan 14, 6:29 am, Tracubik wrote:
> I remember at school time there was some schema or something to create to
> display the interaction of different functions / modules
>
> My idea was to create a model with all the methods and arrows to link
> they...
Do you mean call graphs? http://pycallgrap
# THAT WHAT NEED EXPECT FROM OPERATORS OF PYTHON:
Worddr = "56" # CREATE A STRING: "56"
Word = ["12"] # CREATE A LIST WITH ONE SIGNED: "12"
Word = Word.append("34") # APPEND TO LIST ONE MORE SIGNED: "34"
Word = Word + "34" # MUST APPEND TO LIST ONE MORE SIGNED: "34"
Wordpr = Word[1] # MUST SIGNED
On 01/15/2012 05:11 PM, Saqib Ali wrote:
>
> Very good question. Let me explain why I'm not opening me.txt directly
> in python with open.
>
> The example I have posted is simplified for illustrative purpose. In
> reality, I'm not doing pexpect.spawn("/bin/tcsh"). I'm doing
> pexpect.spawn("ssh m
On 01/14/2012 10:27 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Face it, Guido has broken Python's cherry. She is no longer pure.
> You're acting like some over- protective father. WAKE UP! Python is a
> promiscuous little whore and she's on girls gone wild (Volume 4000)
> shaking her little money maker. We should a
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:51:44 -0800, Saqib Ali wrote:
> I am using Solaris 10, python 2.6.2, pexpect 2.4
Are you sure about that? As far as I can see, pexpect's current version
is 2.3 not 2.4.
> I create a file called me.txt which contains the letters "A", "B", "C"
> on the same line separated
On 15Jan2012 16:14, Saqib Ali wrote:
| The file me.txt does indeed contain tabs. I created it with vi.
|
| >>> text = open("me.txt", "r").read()
| >>> print "\t" in text
| True
|
| % od -c me.txt
| 000 A \t B \t C \n
| 006
|
| % ls -al me.txt
| -rw-r--r-- 1 myUsermyGroup
On Jan 12, 2:19 am, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> First, I'd like to be able to permit users to do more typical log
> rotation, based on their OS's log rotation handler, rather than
> rotating logs from inside an application. This is usually handled by
> signalling an application with a HUP, whereup
The file me.txt does indeed contain tabs. I created it with vi.
>>> text = open("me.txt", "r").read()
>>> print "\t" in text
True
% od -c me.txt
000 A \t B \t C \n
006
% ls -al me.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 myUsermyGroup 6 Jan 15 12:42 me.txt
On Jan 15, 6:40 pm, Cameron Simp
Very good question. Let me explain why I'm not opening me.txt directly
in python with open.
The example I have posted is simplified for illustrative purpose. In
reality, I'm not doing pexpect.spawn("/bin/tcsh"). I'm doing
pexpect.spawn("ssh myuser@ipaddress"). Since I'm operating on a remote
syst
On 15Jan2012 23:04, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
| On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:51:44 -0800, Saqib Ali wrote:
| > I am using Solaris 10, python 2.6.2, pexpect 2.4
| >
| > I create a file called me.txt which contains the letters "A", "B", "C"
| > on the same line separated by tabs.
| [...]
| > Now, clearly t
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:51:44 -0800, Saqib Ali wrote:
> I am using Solaris 10, python 2.6.2, pexpect 2.4
>
> I create a file called me.txt which contains the letters "A", "B", "C"
> on the same line separated by tabs.
[...]
> Now, clearly the file contains tabs.
That is not clear at all. How do y
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 7:54 PM, contro opinion wrote:
> here is my code :
> import urllib
> import lxml.html
> down='http://download.v.163.com/dl/open/00DL0QDR0QDS0QHH.html'
> file=urllib.urlopen(down).
> read()
> root=lxml.html.document_fromstring(file)
> tnodes = root.xpath("//a/@href[contains(
In article ,
Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Jason Friedman wrote:
> >> here is my code :
> >> import urllib
> >> import lxml.html
>
> > What version of python is this? Â Based on the naked "print" I guess
> > 2.x, and I got:
>
> import lxml.html
> > Traceback (mos
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Jason Friedman wrote:
>> here is my code :
>> import urllib
>> import lxml.html
> What version of python is this? Based on the naked "print" I guess
> 2.x, and I got:
import lxml.html
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> ImportErro
I am using Solaris 10, python 2.6.2, pexpect 2.4
I create a file called me.txt which contains the letters "A", "B", "C"
on the same line separated by tabs.
My shell prompt is "% "
I then do the following in the python shell:
>>> import pexpect
>>> x = pexpect.spawn("/bin/tcsh")
>>> x.sendline
Chris Angelico, 15.01.2012 17:13:
> Of course, it's still dodgy to depend on the stability of something
> that isn't proclaimed stable, and would be far better to use some
> other hashing algorithm (MD5 or SHA for uberreliability).
I've seen things like MD5 or SHA* being used quite commonly for fi
Am 15.01.2012 17:13, schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Heiko Wundram wrote:
I don't know the prevalence of suds, but I guess there's more people than me
using it to query SOAP-services - all of those will be affected if the
hash() output is changed. Additionally, if hash(
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Heiko Wundram wrote:
> I don't know the prevalence of suds, but I guess there's more people than me
> using it to query SOAP-services - all of those will be affected if the
> hash() output is changed. Additionally, if hash() isn't stable between runs
> (the randomi
Am 15.01.2012 13:22, schrieb Peter Otten:
Heiko Wundram wrote:
I agree completely with that (I hit the corresponding problem with suds
while transitioning from 32-bit Python to 64-bit Python, where hashes
aren't stable either), but as stated in my mail: that wasn't the
original question. ;-)
I
> here is my code :
> import urllib
> import lxml.html
> down='http://download.v.163.com/dl/open/00DL0QDR0QDS0QHH.html'
> file=urllib.urlopen(down).
> read()
> root=lxml.html.document_fromstring(file)
> tnodes = root.xpath("//a/@href[contains(string(),'mp4')]")
> for i,add in enumerate(tnodes):
>
On 01/15/2012 06:23 AM, Rick Johnson wrote:
So how do we solve this dilemma you ask??? Well, we need to "mark"
method OR variable names (OR both!) with syntactic markers so there
will be NO confusion.
Observe:
def $method(self):pass
self.@instanceveriable
self.@@classvariable
There is
contro opinion wrote:
> you can do it by hand ,
> 1.open
> http://www.flvcd.com/'
> 2.input
> http://v.163.com/movie/2008/10/O/Q/M7F57SUCS_M7F5R3DOQ.html
> 3.click submit
> you can get
> http://mov.bn.netease.com/movie/2012/1/V/7/S7MKQOBV7.flv
>
> i want to emulate it in python with mechanize
you can do it by hand ,
1.open
http://www.flvcd.com/'
2.input
http://v.163.com/movie/2008/10/O/Q/M7F57SUCS_M7F5R3DOQ.html
3.click submit
you can get
http://mov.bn.netease.com/movie/2012/1/V/7/S7MKQOBV7.flv
i want to emulate it in python with mechanize,here is my code ,why i
can't get the rig
Heiko Wundram wrote:
> Am 15.01.2012 11:13, schrieb Stefan Behnel:
>> That's a stupid design. Using a hash function that the application does
>> not control to index into persistent storage just screams for getting the
>> code broken at some point.
>
> I agree completely with that (I hit the corr
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Bryan
wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Suggestion: Create a subclass of dict, the SecureDict or something,
>> ... there's no point adding extra load to every
>> name lookup just because of a security issue in an extremely narrow
>> situation.
>
> That seemingly "
Chris Angelico wrote:
> Suggestion: Create a subclass of dict, the SecureDict or something,
> which could either perturb the hashes or even use a proper
> cryptographic hash function; normal dictionaries can continue to use
> the current algorithm. The description in Objects/dictnotes.txt
> suggest
Am 15.01.2012 11:13, schrieb Stefan Behnel:
That's a stupid design. Using a hash function that the application does not
control to index into persistent storage just screams for getting the code
broken at some point.
I agree completely with that (I hit the corresponding problem with suds
while
Evan Driscoll, 15.01.2012 08:37:
> As I hinted at in an earlier email, I'm working on a module which will
> allow calling readdir() (and FindFirstFile on Windows, hopefully pretty
> uniformly) from Python. The responses I got convinced me that it was a
> good idea to write a C-to-Python bridge as a
Daniel Franke, 14.01.2012 22:15:
> I spent some days and nights on this already and my google-fu is running out.
> I'd like to implement the equivalent of this Python code in a C-extension:
>
> >>> class A(object):
> pass
> >>> class B(A):
> pass
> >>> A
>
> >>> B
>
> >>> B.__bases__
Heiko Wundram, 14.01.2012 23:45:
> Am 14.01.2012 10:46, schrieb Peter Otten:
>> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> How many people rely on hash(some_string) being stable across Python
>>> versions? Does anyone have code that will be broken if the string hashing
>>> algorithm changes?
>>
>> Nobody who under
32 matches
Mail list logo
