- Original Message -
From: Tim Chase
To: Ian Kelly
Cc: Python
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800)
555-1212.
On 09/28/12 22:25, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Tim Chase
On 09/2
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:55 PM, xDog Walker wrote:
>
> The function I am trying to call wants a FILE *:
>
> dlg_progressbox(const char *title,
> const char *cprompt,
> int height,
> int width,
> int pauseopt,
> FILE *
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> What's the run time speed like? How much memory does it use? Shouldn't you
> be using the regex module from pypi instead of the standard library re?
> Guess who's borrowed the time machine?
O(n), O(1), and I used RE2.
-- Devin
--
http://
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> The slicing operation in the second line assumes that they're all
> collected at the end of the list anyway.
>
True enough. Hadn't considered otherwise when I first whipped that off with
the first example (thinking/trying it out *before* posti
On 09/28/12 22:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:25:35 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> Mine is simpler and faster.
>>
>> r = re.compile("")
>
> The OP doesn't say that you have to compile it, so just:
>
> ''
>
> wins.
OP doesn't say it even has to be a string, so I guess
wins
On 09/28/12 22:25, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Tim Chase
On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
> write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
>>
>> r = re.compile(
>> "800-555-1212|"
>> "555-1212|"
>>r"\(800\) 555-1212"
>> )
>
>
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:25:35 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Mine is simpler and faster.
>
> r = re.compile("")
The OP doesn't say that you have to compile it, so just:
''
wins.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Demian Brecht wrote:
>> f = filter(lambda s: s == a[-1], a)
>
> That line's assuming that the last element may also be found in arbitrary
> locations in the list. If it's guaranteed that they're all contiguous at the
> upper bounds, I'd just walk the list backwar
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Tim Chase
wrote:
> On 09/28/12 20:58, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 29/09/2012 02:35, Tim Chase wrote:
>>> On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
>>>
>>> Okay, that was pretty easy. Thanks for the c
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:02:04 +, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
> Just to make sure I am following, if you call foo.__len__() it goes to
> the instance code while if you do len(foo) it will go to
> class.__len__()?
If you call foo.__len__, the attribute lookup of __len__ will use the
exact same search
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:50:14 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> I'm pretty sure nobody thinks Python is on a death march.
Don't be so sure. There's always *someone* complaining about something,
and they're usually convinced that (Language X) is on it's last legs
because (feature Y) is missing or
Hello -- I am running python from an application, starting it with a call to
the python31.dll
I think I am missing something in my path -- any help would be appreciated --
thanks
Here is the script and the output ---
# this is a test
import sys
print('hello from python')
print('Number of ar
On 09/28/12 20:58, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 29/09/2012 02:35, Tim Chase wrote:
>> On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
>>> write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
>>
>> Okay, that was pretty easy. Thanks for the challenge :-)
>
> What's the run time speed like?
O(1)
r
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:39:33 -0700, dave wrote:
> a = ['a', 'b', x]
> b = sorted(a)
>
> What does x need to be to always be last on an ascending sort no matter
> what 'a' and 'b' are within reason...
How about this?
a = ['a', 'b']
b = sorted(a) + ['whatever you want']
You could also do thi
>> I understand that use of QThread.terminate is discouraged,
>> but it has worked well previously and I would like to continue
>> this use if possible.
>>
> And now you've encountered the reason it is discouraged.
Ok. Point taken.
What I hear you saying is that once I use .terminate anyth
On 29/09/2012 02:35, Tim Chase wrote:
On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
Okay, that was pretty easy. Thanks for the challenge :-)
-tkc
What's the run time speed like? How much memory does it use? Shouldn't
you be using
iMath writes:
> write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
And then you have two problems.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
dave writes:
> What does x need to be to always be last on an ascending sort no
> matter what 'a' and 'b' are within reason...
Why are you trying to do that? It sounds ugly. Just sort the list with
the a's and b's. If you absolutely have to, you could make a class with
comparison methods
On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
> write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
Okay, that was pretty easy. Thanks for the challenge :-)
-tkc
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 29/09/12 00:51, dave wrote:
more clearer, this is a more realistic use case:
['awefawef', 'awefawfsf', 'awefsdf', 'zz', 'zz',
'zz']
and the quantity of ''zz'' would be dynamic.
Maybe,
class Greatest:
def __lt__(self, other):
r
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:49:36 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> levels = 6
> for combination in itertools.product(xrange(n_syms), levels):
> # do stuff
>>> n_syms = 3
>>> levels = 6
>>> for combination in itertools.product(xrange(n_syms), levels):
... print combination
...
Traceback (most recent
On 2012-09-28, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Rikishi42 wrote:
>> The scripts in question only increase numbers. But should that not be the
>> case, solutions are simple enough. The numbers can be formatted to have a
>> fixed size. In the case of random line contents (a
On 2012-09-28, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:25:39 + (UTC), John Gordon
> declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
>
>>
>> Isn't terminal output line-buffered? I don't understand why there would
>> be an output delay. (Unless the "\r" is messing things up..
> f = filter(lambda s: s == a[-1], a)
That line's assuming that the last element may also be found in arbitrary
locations in the list. If it's guaranteed that they're all contiguous at the
upper bounds, I'd just walk the list backwards until I found one that wasn't
matching rather than filterin
于 2012-9-28 16:16, Kushal Kumaran 写道:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:15 PM, 叶佑群 wrote:
Hi, all,
I have the shell command like this:
sfdisk -uM /dev/sdb<< EOT
,1000,83
,,83
EOT
I have tried subprocess.Popen, pexpect.spawn and os.popen, but none of
these works, but when I type this shel
于 2012-9-28 16:16, Kushal Kumaran 写道:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:15 PM, 叶佑群 wrote:
Hi, all,
I have the shell command like this:
sfdisk -uM /dev/sdb<< EOT
,1000,83
,,83
EOT
I have tried subprocess.Popen, pexpect.spawn and os.popen, but none of
these works, but when I type this shel
On 9/28/2012 2:42 PM, Franck Ditter wrote:
Hi !
Here is Python 3.3
Is it better in any way to use print(x,x,x,file='out')
or out.write(x) ? Any reason to prefer any of them ?
print converts objects to strings and adds separators and terminators.
If you have a string s and want to output it as
Apparently gmail hates me and my last response didn't get through:
a = ['awefawef', 'awefawfsf', 'awefsdf', 'zz',
'zz', 'zz']
f = filter(lambda s: s == a[-1], a)
l = sorted(lst[:-len(f)]) + f
Now, not 100% sure about efficiency over large sizes of a, but tha
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
dave於 2012年9月29日星期六UTC+8上午7時51分10秒寫道：
> more clearer, this is a more realistic use case:
>
>
>
> ['awefawef', 'awefawfsf', 'awefsdf', 'zz', 'zz',
> 'zz']
>
>
>
> and the quantity of ''zz'' would be dynamic.
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 28, 2
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:57:14 +0200, Gilles wrote:
>I guess the FastCGI server (Flup) only updates its cache every so
>often. Do I need to type a command to force Flup to recompile the
>Python script?
Turns out that, yes, mod_fcgid is configured to reload a script only
after some time or some numb
Maybe
l = filter(a, lambda v: v == a[-1])
sorted(a[:-len(l)]) + l
?
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:51 PM, dave wrote:
> more clearer, this is a more realistic use case:
>
> ['awefawef', 'awefawfsf', 'awefsdf', 'zz', 'zz',
> 'zz']
>
> and the quantity of ''zzz
more clearer, this is a more realistic use case:
['awefawef', 'awefawfsf', 'awefsdf', 'zz', 'zz',
'zz']
and the quantity of ''zz'' would be dynamic.
On Friday, September 28, 2012 4:46:15 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
>
> > a = ['a', 'b', x]
>
> >
>
> >
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:39 PM, dave wrote:
> a = ['a', 'b', x]
>
> b = sorted(a)
>
> What does x need to be to always be last on an ascending sort no matter what
> 'a' and 'b' are within reason... I am expecting 'a' and 'b' will be not
> longer than 10 char's long I tried making x = 'z
If you don't have access to restart Apache (or `x` server), then touch
fcgi.py *should* work.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Hello
>
> Does someone know if something must be done after editing a FastCGI +
> WSGI script so that the changes will show in the browser immediately
>
a = ['a', 'b', x]
b = sorted(a)
What does x need to be to always be last on an ascending sort no matter what
'a' and 'b' are within reason... I am expecting 'a' and 'b' will be not
longer than 10 char's long I tried making x = '' and
believe it or not, this appears FIRS
Hello
Does someone know if something must be done after editing a FastCGI +
WSGI script so that the changes will show in the browser immediately
instead of having to wait X minutes?
===
#!/usr/bin/env python2.6
def myapp(environ, start_response):
start_response('200 OK', [('Conte
The function I am trying to call wants a FILE *:
dlg_progressbox(const char *title,
const char *cprompt,
int height,
int width,
int pauseopt,
FILE *fp)
I can open the file to be referenced:
fp = os.fdopen(self.pipef
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Franck Ditter wrote:
Hi !
Here is Python 3.3
Is it better in any way to use print(x,x,x,file='out')
or out.write(x) ? Any reason to prefer any of them ?
There should be a printlines, like readlines ?
Thanks,
The print function automatically appends newlines to the end of w
On 2012-09-28, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
> In your example, it seem that the iterable of the for loop is
> always the same: range(n_sysms). It seems to be a number. Is
> that true? If that is so, then here is something useful:
>
> import copy
>
> class MultiLevelIterator(object):
> def __init__(self
Benjamin Jessup wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> What do people recommend for a file format for a python desktop
> application? Data is complex with 100s/1000s of class instances, which
> reference each other.
>
> Write the file with struct module? (Rebuild object pointers, safe,
> compact, portable, not
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:59 PM, alex23 wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2:17 am, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>> Uncharitably, it's just a way of hiding one's head in the sand,
>> ignoring any problems Python has by focusing on what problems it
>> doesn't have.
>
> But isn't that what counterpoint is all about?
Hi !
Here is Python 3.3
Is it better in any way to use print(x,x,x,file='out')
or out.write(x) ? Any reason to prefer any of them ?
There should be a printlines, like readlines ?
Thanks,
franck
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Prasad, Ramit
wrote:
> I guess you can consider re.match's pattern to be
> prefixed with '^'.
You can in this case, but they're not equivalent in multi-line mode:
>>> re.match('^two', 'one\ntwo', re.M)
>>> re.search('^two', 'one\ntwo', re.M)
<_sre.SRE_Match obje
On 9/28/2012 2:02 PM, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
Just to make sure I am following, if you call
foo.__len__() it goes to the instance code while
if you do len(foo) it will go to class.__len__()?
len(foo) calls someclass.__len__(foo) where someclass is foo.__class__or
some superclass.
If so, why?
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Prasad, Ramit
wrote:
> Just to make sure I am following, if you call
> foo.__len__() it goes to the instance code while
> if you do len(foo) it will go to class.__len__()?
Yes:
>>> class Foo(object):
... def __len__(self):
... return 42
...
>>> foo =
iMath wrote:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:39 AM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: regular expression : the dollar sign ($) work with re.match() or
> re.search() ？
>
> I only know the dollar sign ($) will match a pattern from the
> end of a string,but which method does it work wi
Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/25/2012 4:07 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> >> On 9/25/2012 11:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> Instance attributes override (shadow) class attributes.
> >>
> >>
> >> except for (some? all?) special methods
> >
> > Those n
The Windows stat() call treats things differently,
FROM: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/14h5k7ff%28v=vs.80%29.aspx
st_ctime
Time of creation of file. Valid on NTFS but not on FAT formatted disk
drives.
I don't think that Windows has a concept of a "change time" for meta data
(th
Jayden於 2012年9月28日星期五UTC+8下午7時57分14秒寫道：
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone told me
> that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it really
> the case? Any way to protect your source code?
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
>
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:12:35 -0700, 陈伟 wrote:
> what is the difference between st_ctime and st_mtime one is the time of
> last change and the other is the time of last modification, but i can
> not understand what is the difference between 'change' and 'modification'.
st_mtime is updated when th
- Original Message -
> Hi all,
>
> Please, I need you suggest me a way to get statistics about a
> progress
> of my python script. My python script could take a lot of time
> processing a file, so I need a way that an external program check the
> progress of the script. My first idea was t
In
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rolando_Ca=F1er_Roblejo?= writes:
> Hi all,
> Please, I need you suggest me a way to get statistics about a progress
> of my python script. My python script could take a lot of time
> processing a file, so I need a way that an external program check the
> progress of the s
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Demian Brecht wrote:
> (A little OT so my apologies up front)
>
>
> On 12-09-28 12:39 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> I love the idea, even though I shan't be entering. Code golf is awesome
>> fun!
>
>
> Code golf is indeed awesome fun and I usually enjoy taking p
Hi all,
Please, I need you suggest me a way to get statistics about a progress
of my python script. My python script could take a lot of time
processing a file, so I need a way that an external program check the
progress of the script. My first idea was that the python script write a
temp fil
On Sep 28, 2012 9:49 AM, "Ian Kelly" wrote:
> levels = 6
> for combination in itertools.product(xrange(n_syms), levels):
> # do stuff
Sorry, that should have read "product(xrange(n_syms), repeat=levels)". The
repeat argument is keyword-only.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
On 9/28/2012 9:19 AM, stu...@molden.no wrote:
kl. 16:38:10 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jerry Hill følgende:
This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
Neither of them are very "obfuscated".
In general though, why does it matter?
Paranoia among man
Neal Becker wrote:
> I know this should be a fairly basic question, but I'm drawing a blank.
>
> I have code that looks like:
>
> for s0 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s1 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s2 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s3 in xrange (n_syms):
>
On 09/27/2012 10:37 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:>[...]
> * MySQL is designed for dynamic web sites, with lots of reading and
> not too much writing. Its row and table locking system is pretty
> rudimentary, and it's quite easy for performance to suffer really
> badly if you don't think about it. But i
Neal Becker wrote:
> I know this should be a fairly basic question, but I'm drawing a blank.
>
> I have code that looks like:
>
> for s0 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s1 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s2 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s3 in xrange (n_syms):
>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I know this should be a fairly basic question, but I'm drawing a blank.
>
> I have code that looks like:
>
> for s0 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s1 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s2 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s3 in
On 09/28/12 09:39, Neal Becker wrote:
> I know this should be a fairly basic question, but I'm drawing a blank.
>
> I have code that looks like:
>
> for s0 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s1 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s2 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s3 in xrange (n_sy
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 28.09.2012 17:07, schrieb Chris Angelico:
> In the future please read the manual before replying! ;) You are wrong,
> ctime is *not* the creation time. It's the change time of the inode.
> It's updated whenever the inode is modified, e.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Yes, MySQL has definitely improved. There was a time when its
>> unreliability applied to all your data too, but now you can just click
>> in InnoDB and have mostly-real transaction suppo
kl. 16:38:10 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jerry Hill følgende:
> This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
Neither of them are very "obfuscated".
> In general though, why does it matter?
Paranoia among managers?
> What are you trying to protect y
Am 28.09.2012 17:07, schrieb Chris Angelico:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:12 PM, 陈伟 wrote:
>>
>> --
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> In future, can you put the body of your message into the body please? :)
>
> ctime is creation time, not change time. mtime is modificati
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yes, MySQL has definitely improved. There was a time when its
> unreliability applied to all your data too, but now you can just click
> in InnoDB and have mostly-real transaction support etc. But there's
> still a lot of work that by requir
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:12 PM, 陈伟 wrote:
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In future, can you put the body of your message into the body please? :)
ctime is creation time, not change time. mtime is modification time,
as you have. But I can understand where the confu
On 2012-09-28 16:39, Neal Becker wrote:
I know this should be a fairly basic question, but I'm drawing a blank.
I have code that looks like:
for s0 in xrange (n_syms):
for s1 in xrange (n_syms):
for s2 in xrange (n_syms):
for s3 in xrange (n_syms):
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:37:21 +1000, Chris Angelico
> declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
>
>
>> For further details, poke around on the web; I'm sure you'll find
>> plenty of good blog posts etc. But as for me and my h
W dniu 2012-09-28 16:42, Alister pisze:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:39:32 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I know this should be a fairly basic question, but I'm drawing a blank.
I have code that looks like:
for s0 in xrange (n_syms):
for s1 in xrange (n_syms):
for s2 in xrange (
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:39:32 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I know this should be a fairly basic question, but I'm drawing a blank.
>
> I have code that looks like:
>
> for s0 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s1 in xrange (n_syms):
> for s2 in xrange (n_syms):
> for
I know this should be a fairly basic question, but I'm drawing a blank.
I have code that looks like:
for s0 in xrange (n_syms):
for s1 in xrange (n_syms):
for s2 in xrange (n_syms):
for s3 in xrange (n_syms):
for s4 in range (n_syms):
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:18 AM, wrote:
> Python bytecode is not easier to hack than Java or .NET bytecodes.
This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
In general though, why does it matter? What are you trying to protect
yourself against? If you're including
kl. 13:57:14 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jayden følgende:
> Dear All, I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone
> told me that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it
> really the case? Any way to protect your source code? Thanks a lot! J
(A little OT so my apologies up front)
On 12-09-28 12:39 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
I love the idea, even though I shan't be entering. Code golf is awesome fun!
Code golf is indeed awesome fun and I usually enjoy taking part as well.
However, I'm not a fan of code golf such as this, that uses
On 12-09-28 06:19 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
Not just flexible but portable. On various systems I have Python
in /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin and /usr/pkg/bin. "#!/usr/bin/env python"
finds it in each case so I only need one version of the script.
+1. This also resolves correctly on Cygwin, even if
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:19:54 -0400, D'Arcy Cain
wrote:
>Not just flexible but portable. On various systems I have Python
>in /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin and /usr/pkg/bin. "#!/usr/bin/env python"
>finds it in each case so I only need one version of the script.
Good to know.
--
http://mail.python.o
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:16:22 +0200, "Michael Ross"
wrote:
>Do it the other way around:
>
># cgitb before anything else
>import cgitb
>cgitb.enable()
>
># so this error will be caught
> from fcgi import WSGIServer
Thanks much for the tip. The error isn't displayed when calling the
script from a we
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:57:28 -0400
Roy Smith wrote:
> > I've seen both shebang lines to run a Python script on a *nix host:
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/env python
> > #!/usr/bin/python
> >
> > What's the difference?
>
> The first one looks through your PATH to find the right python
> interpreter to run
On Sep 28, 5:54 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:08:24 -0700, rusi wrote:
> > On Sep 27, 5:11 pm, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Steven D'Aprano
>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:15:00 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote: And a
> >> > response:
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:08:24 -0700, rusi wrote:
> On Sep 27, 5:11 pm, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Steven D'Aprano
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:15:00 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote: And a
>> > response:
>>
>> >http://data.geek.nz/python-is-doing-just-fine
>
> sys.executable was printed out as ''C:\\Python25\\python.exe'', how
> can I make this work in executable package through py2exe?
Does http://www.py2exe.org/index.cgi/WhereAmI help?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:37:36 +0200, Gilles wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to run my very first FastCGI script on an Apache shared
host that relies on mod_fcgid:
==
#!/usr/bin/python
from fcgi import WSGIServer
import cgitb
# enable debugging
cgitb.enable()
def myapp(environ, start_respo
On 09/28/2012 02:17 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 28/09/2012 12:57, Jayden wrote:
Dear All,
I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone
told me that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code.
Is it really the case? Any way to protect your source code?
Thanks
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:37:36 +0200, Gilles wrote:
>==
>Internal Server Error
>
>The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was
>unable to complete your request.
>==
Looks like fcgi.py doesn't support WSGI:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "he
On 28/09/2012 12:57, Jayden wrote:
Dear All,
I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone told me
that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it really the
case? Any way to protect your source code?
Thanks a lot!
Jayden
This question has been as
On Sep 27, 5:11 pm, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Steven D'Aprano
>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:15:00 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > And a response:
>
> >http://data.geek.nz/python-is-doing-just-fine
>
> Summary of that article:
>
> "Sure, you have all these
Hello
I'm trying to run my very first FastCGI script on an Apache shared
host that relies on mod_fcgid:
==
#!/usr/bin/python
from fcgi import WSGIServer
import cgitb
# enable debugging
cgitb.enable()
def myapp(environ, start_response):
start_response('200 OK', [('Content-Type
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:57:28 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
>The first one looks through your PATH to find the right python
>interpreter to run. The second one is hard-wired to run /usr/bin/python.
>
>If you only have a single copy of python installed, it doesn't really
>matter which you use. But, yo
In article <34va6856ocuas7jpueujscf3kdt7k44...@4ax.com>,
Gilles wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've seen both shebang lines to run a Python script on a *nix host:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
> #!/usr/bin/python
>
> What's the difference?
The first one looks through your PATH to find the right python
inte
Gilles writes:
> #!/usr/bin/env python
> #!/usr/bin/python
>
> What's the difference?
Not much if your python is /usr/bin/python: env looks for python and
finds the same executable.
When python is not /usr/bin/python but something else that is still
found by your system, /usr/bin/env still find
Hello
I've seen both shebang lines to run a Python script on a *nix host:
#!/usr/bin/env python
#!/usr/bin/python
What's the difference?
Thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 27/09/2012 20:08, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 9/27/2012 5:33 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Nevertheless, I think there is something here. The consequences are
nowhere
near as dramatic as jmf claims, but it does seem that replace() has
taken a
serious performance hit. Perhaps it is unavoidable, but pe
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:15 PM, 叶佑群 wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I have the shell command like this:
>
> sfdisk -uM /dev/sdb << EOT
> ,1000,83
> ,,83
> EOT
>
>
> I have tried subprocess.Popen, pexpect.spawn and os.popen, but none of
> these works, but when I type this shell command in shell, it
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Rikishi42 wrote:
> The scripts in question only increase numbers. But should that not be the
> case, solutions are simple enough. The numbers can be formatted to have a
> fixed size. In the case of random line contents (a list of filesnames, say)
> it's enough to
Hi, all,
I have the shell command like this:
sfdisk -uM /dev/sdb << EOT
,1000,83
,,83
EOT
I have tried subprocess.Popen, pexpect.spawn and os.popen, but none
of these works, but when I type this shell command in shell, it is works
fine. I wonder how to emulate this type o
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Alec Taylor wrote:
> web2py (7 lines): https://gist.github.com/3798093
I love the idea, even though I shan't be entering. Code golf is awesome fun!
My latest golf game involved importing code comments and text-file
annotations into autodoc markup... with two one-
>>Summary of that article:
>>
>>"Sure, you have all these legitimate concerns, but look, cake!"
>
> Quote : "This piece argues that Python is an easy-to-learn
> language that where you can be almost immediately productive in."
It is, but so is every other language. "hello world" is the
standard...
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
