On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:21:32 -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 11/11/12 17:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> but that leaves you with the next two problems:
>>
>> 2) Fixing the assert still leaves you with the wrong exception. You
>> wouldn't raise a ZeroDivisionError, or a UnicodeDecodeError, or an
>> IO
On Nov 11, 3:58 am, Roy Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to pull down tweets with one of the many twitter APIs. The
> particular one I'm using (python-twitter), has a call:
>
> data = api.GetSearch(term="foo", page=page)
>
> The way it works, you start with page=1. It returns a list of tweets.
> If the
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:31:53 +, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
[...]
>>> You were right the first time, Chris. A point that happens to coincide
>>> with the arbitrarily chosen origin is no more truthy or falsey than
>>> any other. A vector of length 0 on the other hand is a very different
>>> beast.
>>
On 12 November 2012 01:29, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 01:18, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> On 12 November 2012 01:10, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/11/2012 00:31, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
Plain wrong. Vectors are not defined *from any origin*.
>>>
>>> So when the Captain says
On Nov 11, 4:44 pm, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 11Nov2012 11:16, Steve Howell wrote:
> | On Nov 11, 10:34 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> | > Steve Howell wrote:
> | > > On Nov 11, 1:09 am, Paul Rubin wrote:
> | > >> Cameron Simpson writes:
> | > >> > | I'd prefer the original code
In article ,
Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> But then I'm assuming you meant that 245 degrees was a bearing
> relative to North. Was it supposed to be relative to my current angle?
> Truthfully I wouldn't know what to do without asking the captain a
> couple more questions.
Granted, this requires some
On 12/11/2012 01:15, Roy Smith wrote:
In article ,
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 12/11/2012 00:31, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
Plain wrong. Vectors are not defined *from any origin*.
So when the Captain says "full speed ahead, steer 245 degrees", you
haven't the faintest idea where you're going, be
On 12/11/2012 01:18, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
On 12 November 2012 01:10, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 12/11/2012 00:31, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
Plain wrong. Vectors are not defined *from any origin*.
So when the Captain says "full speed ahead, steer 245 degrees", you haven't
the faintest idea where
In article ,
Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 00:31, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> >
> > Plain wrong. Vectors are not defined *from any origin*.
> >
>
> So when the Captain says "full speed ahead, steer 245 degrees", you
> haven't the faintest idea where you're going, because you have no origin?
On 12 November 2012 01:10, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 00:31, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>
>>
>> Plain wrong. Vectors are not defined *from any origin*.
>>
>
> So when the Captain says "full speed ahead, steer 245 degrees", you haven't
> the faintest idea where you're going, because you have
On 12/11/2012 00:31, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
Plain wrong. Vectors are not defined *from any origin*.
So when the Captain says "full speed ahead, steer 245 degrees", you
haven't the faintest idea where you're going, because you have no origin?
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python
On Nov 11, 4:31 pm, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 11 November 2012 22:31, Steven D'Aprano
> > Nonsense. The length and direction of a vector is relative to the origin.
> > If the origin is arbitrary, as you claim, then so is the length of the
> > vector.
>
> Wrong on all counts. Neither the length n
On 11Nov2012 11:16, Steve Howell wrote:
| On Nov 11, 10:34 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
| > Steve Howell wrote:
| > > On Nov 11, 1:09 am, Paul Rubin wrote:
| > >> Cameron Simpson writes:
| > >> > | I'd prefer the original code ten times over this inaccessible beast.
| > >> > Me too.
On Nov 10, 11:33 am, Jennie wrote:
> What is the best solution to solve the following problem in Python 3.3?
>
> import math
> >>> class Point:
> ... def __init__(self, x=0, y=0):
> ... self.x = x
> ... self.y = y
> ... def __sub__(self, other):
> ... return Point(
On 11 November 2012 22:31, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:21:19 +, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>> On 11 November 2012 02:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ian Kelly
>>> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Chris Angelico
wrote:
> I
On 12/11/2012 00:05, ejsa...@alaska.edu wrote:
with open("/home/eyalak/Documents/weather/weather.csv", "wb") as f:
writer = csv.writer(f)
table = soup.findAll("table")[3]
#print table
for tr in table.findAll("tr", valign="top"):
a={x.string for x in tr.findA
On 11/11/12 17:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> but that leaves you with the next two problems:
>
> 2) Fixing the assert still leaves you with the wrong exception. You
> wouldn't raise a ZeroDivisionError, or a UnicodeDecodeError, or an IOError
> would you? No of course not. So why are you suggestin
Hello,
I have the script below, which it extracts NOAA data from HTML and is planed
writes it to a CSV file. Here is the script:
import urllib2
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
from time import localtime, strftime
import csv
#This script is intended to retrive NOAA data and apend it to a csv file.
Thanks everyone for your answers. That's much clearer now.
I see that I was somehow fighting python instead of using it. Lesson
learned (for the time being at least) :)
I'll probably get back with more questions...
Cheers,
Cantabile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:37:05 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
> or if you want them to be identified by keyword only (since 7 positional
> args is a bit much)
>
> def __init__(self, smtp, login, *, subject, from, to, msg):
>
> (I forget when this feature was added)
It's a Python 3 feature.
--
Stev
On 11/11/2012 5:56 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Cantabile wrote:
I'd like to do something like that instead of the 'for' loop in __init__:
assert[key for key in required if key in params.keys()]
A list evaluates as true if it is not empty. As long as at least one
of
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:24:14 +0100, Cantabile wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm writing a small mail library for my own use, and at the time I'm
> testing parameters like this:
>
> class Mail(object):
> def __init__(self, smtp, login, **params)
> blah
> blah
> required = ['Subjec
> assert[key for key in required if key in params.keys()]
...
> Could you explain why it doesn't work and do you have any idea of how it
> could work ?
Well, here, if any of the items are found, you get a list that is
non-False'ish, so the assert passes.
It sounds like you want all() (available
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Cantabile wrote:
> I'd like to do something like that instead of the 'for' loop in __init__:
>
> assert[key for key in required if key in params.keys()]
A list evaluates as true if it is not empty. As long as at least one
of the required parameters is present, th
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:21:19 +, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 11 November 2012 02:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ian Kelly
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Chris Angelico
>>> wrote:
I would not assume that. The origin is a point, just like any
Hi,
I'm writing a small mail library for my own use, and at the time I'm
testing parameters like this:
class Mail(object):
def __init__(self, smtp, login, **params)
blah
blah
required = ['Subject', 'From', 'To', 'msg']
for i in required:
if not i
On 9 nov, 22:14, w...@mac.com wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Jean Dubois wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The error may be obvious but finding this file and how to install it
> > is not unfortunately.
> > It seems I have to install it from the National Instruments site but
> > Debian Linux d
In article ,
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> deque(
> imap(
> process,
> chain.from_iterable(
> takewhile(bool, imap(partial(api.GetSearch, term), count(1),
> maxlen=0)
>
> ;)
If I wanted STL, I would still be writing C++ :-)
--
http://mail.pyth
On Nov 11, 10:34 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Steve Howell wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 1:09 am, Paul Rubin wrote:
> >> Cameron Simpson writes:
> >> > | I'd prefer the original code ten times over this inaccessible beast.
> >> > Me too.
>
> >> Me, I like the itertools version better. The
Steve Howell wrote:
> On Nov 11, 1:09 am, Paul Rubin wrote:
>> Cameron Simpson writes:
>> > | I'd prefer the original code ten times over this inaccessible beast.
>> > Me too.
>>
>> Me, I like the itertools version better. There's one chunk of data
>> that goes through a succession of transform
On Nov 11, 9:48 am, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
> I'm sure this must be possible but at the moment I can't see how to do it.
>
> I want to send an E-Mail when the logging module logs a message above
> a certain level (probably for ERROR and CRITICAL messages only).
>
> I.e. I want some sort of hook t
I'm sure this must be possible but at the moment I can't see how to do it.
I want to send an E-Mail when the logging module logs a message above
a certain level (probably for ERROR and CRITICAL messages only).
I.e. I want some sort of hook that will be called when these messages
are logged (I can
On Nov 9, 4:48 pm, bruceg113...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there a simpler way to modify all arguments in a function before using the
> arguments?
>
> For example, can the below code, in the modify arguments section be made into
> a few statements?
>
> def someComputation (aa, bb, cc, dd, ee, ff,
tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
> I'm a little confused about the relationship between the Python
> email.parser convenience function email.message_from_string() and the
> mailbox.Message objects.
>
> If I want an mailbox.mboxMessage given the message as a stream of text
> is the right way to do it as f
On Nov 11, 1:09 am, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Cameron Simpson writes:
> > | I'd prefer the original code ten times over this inaccessible beast.
> > Me too.
>
> Me, I like the itertools version better. There's one chunk of data
> that goes through a succession of transforms each of which
> is very str
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 1:54:46 AM UTC-8, Peter Otten wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
>
>
>
> > Cameron Simpson writes:
>
> >> | I'd prefer the original code ten times over this inaccessible beast.
>
> >> Me too.
>
> >
>
> > Me, I like the itertools version better. There's one chunk of da
danielk writes:
> Ian's solution gives me what I need (thanks Ian!). But I notice a
> difference between '__str__' and '__repr__'.
>
> class Pytest(str):
> def __init__(self, data = None):
> if data == None: data = ""
> self.data = data
>
> def __repr__(self):
> re
I'm a little confused about the relationship between the Python
email.parser convenience function email.message_from_string() and the
mailbox.Message objects.
If I want an mailbox.mboxMessage given the message as a stream of text
is the right way to do it as follows (or at least a reasonable way t
Am 09.11.2012 18:17 schrieb danielk:
I'm using this character as a delimiter in my application.
Then you probably use the *byte* 254 as opposed to the *character* 254.
So it might be better to either switch to byte strings, or output the
representation of the string instead of itself.
So d
On 11 November 2012 02:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> I would not assume that. The origin is a point, just like any other.
>>> With a Line class, you could deem a zero-length line to be l
On Friday, November 9, 2012 5:11:12 PM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:46 PM, danielk wrote:
>
> > D:\home\python>pytest.py
>
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> > File "D:\home\python\pytest.py", line 1, in
>
> > print(chr(253).decode('latin1'))
>
> > AttributeErro
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Cameron Simpson writes:
>> | I'd prefer the original code ten times over this inaccessible beast.
>> Me too.
>
> Me, I like the itertools version better. There's one chunk of data
> that goes through a succession of transforms each of which
> is very straightforward.
[Steve
Aahz wrote:
> In article ,
> Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>>Miki Tebeka wrote:
>>
Is there a simpler way to modify all arguments in a function before
using the arguments?
>>>
>>> You can use a decorator:
>>>
>>> from functools import wraps
>>>
>>> def fix_args(fn):
>>> @w
Cameron Simpson writes:
> | I'd prefer the original code ten times over this inaccessible beast.
> Me too.
Me, I like the itertools version better. There's one chunk of data
that goes through a succession of transforms each of which
is very straightforward.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
On 11Nov2012 08:56, Stefan Behnel wrote:
| Steve Howell, 11.11.2012 04:03:
| > On Nov 10, 2:58 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
| >> page = 1
| >> while 1:
| >> r = api.GetSearch(term="foo", page=page)
| >> if not r:
| >> break
| >> for tweet in r:
| >>
On Thursday, August 2, 2012 10:05:25 PM UTC+5:30, devi wrote:
> KAJAL SEX VIDEOS
>
> http://maxworkerds.co.cc
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Howell, 11.11.2012 04:03:
> On Nov 10, 2:58 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
>> I'm trying to pull down tweets with one of the many twitter APIs. The
>> particular one I'm using (python-twitter), has a call:
>>
>> data = api.GetSearch(term="foo", page=page)
>>
>> The way it works, you start with page=1
47 matches
Mail list logo
