On 19May2013 09:01, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote:
| Cameron Simpson wrote:
|
| TL;DR: I think I want to modify an int value in place.
|
| Yesterday I was thinking about various flag set objects I have
| floating around which are essentially bare objects whose attributes
| I access,
On 20May2013 13:23, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
| Cameron Simpson wrote:
| It's an int _subclass_ so that it is no bigger than an int.
|
| If you use __slots__ to eliminate the overhead of an
| instance dict, you'll get an object consisting of a
| header plus one reference,
On 18 May 2013 20:33, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Python threads work fine if the threads either rely on intelligent
DLLs for number crunching (instead of doing nested Python loops to
process a numeric array you pass it to something like NumPy which
releases the GIL
On 5/20/2013 1:04 AM, Vito De Tullio wrote:
Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
Do you think tkinter is going to be the standard python built-in gui
solution as long as python exists?
AT the moment, there is nothing really comparable that is a realistic
candidate to replace tkinter.
FLTK?
Hi all
I am trying to emulate a SQL check constraint in Python. Quoting from
the PostgreSQL docs, A check constraint is the most generic constraint
type. It allows you to specify that the value in a certain column must
satisfy a Boolean (truth-value) expression.
The problem is that I want
CALL FOR PAPERS:
6th International Workshop on Multi/many-Core Computing Systems
(MuCoCoS-2013)
September 7, 2013, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
in conjunction with the 22nd Int. Conference on
Parallel Architectures and Compilation
It seems to me you can't use ast.literal_eval()[1] to evaluate that kind of
expression because it's just for literals[2].
Why don't you use eval()?
[1] http://docs.python.org/2/library/ast.html#ast-helpers
[2] http://docs.python.org/2/reference/lexical_analysis.html#literals
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com wrote:
Hi all
I am trying to emulate a SQL check constraint in Python. Quoting from the
PostgreSQL docs, A check constraint is the most generic constraint type. It
allows you to specify that the value in a certain column must
On 20May2013 09:47, Avnesh Shakya avnesh.n...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
| On 19May2013 20:54, Avnesh Shakya avnesh.n...@gmail.com wrote:
| |How to run a python script twice randomly in a day? Actually
| | I want to run my
On 20May2013 07:25, Fábio Santos fabiosantos...@gmail.com wrote:
| On 18 May 2013 20:33, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
| Python threads work fine if the threads either rely on intelligent
| DLLs for number crunching (instead of doing nested Python loops to
| process a
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 13:10:36 +1000
From: c...@zip.com.au
To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
CC: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Please help with Threading
On 19May2013 03:02, Carlos Nepomuceno carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
| Just been
[Corrected top-posting]
To: python-list@python.org
From: fr...@chagford.com
Subject: Question about ast.literal_eval
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:05:48 +0200
Hi all
I am trying to emulate a SQL check constraint in Python. Quoting from
the PostgreSQL docs, A check constraint is the most generic
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:45:14 +1000
From: c...@zip.com.au
To: fabiosantos...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Please help with Threading
CC: python-list@python.org; wlfr...@ix.netcom.com
On 20May2013 07:25, Fábio Santos fabiosantos...@gmail.com wrote:
| On
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com wrote:
On 20/05/2013 09:34, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Why don't you use eval()?
Because users can create their own columns, with their own constraints.
Therefore the string is user-modifiable, so it cannot be trusted.
Plenty
My use case was a tight loop processing an image pixel by pixel, or
crunching a CSV file. If it only uses local variables (and probably hold a
lock before releasing the GIL) it should be safe, no?
My idea is that it's a little bad to have to write C or use multiprocessing
just to do simultaneous
To: python-list@python.org
From: fr...@chagford.com
Subject: Re: Question about ast.literal_eval
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:50:02 +0200
[Corrected top-posting]
To: python-list@python.org
From: fr...@chagford.com
Subject: Question about
On 20/05/2013 09:55, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com wrote:
On 20/05/2013 09:34, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Why don't you use eval()?
Because users can create their own columns, with their own constraints.
Therefore the string is
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno
carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
I understand your motivation but I don't know what protection
ast.literal_eval() is offering that eval() doesn't.
eval will *execute code*, while literal_eval will not. That's the
protection. With
On 20/05/2013 09:55, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Why don't you use eval()?
Because users can create their own columns, with their own constraints.
Therefore the string is user-modifiable, so it cannot be trusted.
I understand your motivation but I
On Mon, 20 May 2013 10:55:35 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
I understand your motivation but I don't know what protection
ast.literal_eval() is offering that eval() doesn't.
eval will evaluate any legal Python expression:
py eval(__import__('os').system('echo Mwahaha! Now you are pwned!')
On 20May2013 10:53, Carlos Nepomuceno carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
| I just got my hands dirty trying to synchronize Python prints from many
threads.
| Sometimes they mess up when printing the newlines.
| I tried several approaches using threading.Lock and Condition.
| None of them worked
On 20 May 2013 09:19, Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com wrote:
Quoting from the manual -
Safely evaluate an expression node or a string containing a Python
expression. The string or node provided may only consist of the following
Python literal structures: strings, bytes, numbers, tuples, lists,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
_lock = Lock()
def lprint(*a, **kw):
global _lock
with _lock:
print(*a, **kw)
and use lprint() everywhere?
Fun little hack:
def print(*args,print=print,lock=Lock(),**kwargs):
with lock:
On Fri, 2013-05-17, Olive wrote:
One feature that seems to be missing in the re module (or any tools
that I know for searching text) is diacretical incensitive search. I
would like to have a match for something like this:
re.match(franc, français)
...
The algorithm to write such a function
On 2013-05-20 08:00, Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
On 5/20/2013 1:04 AM, Vito De Tullio wrote:
Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
Do you think tkinter is going to be the standard python built-in gui
solution as long as python exists?
AT the moment, there is nothing really comparable that is a realistic
It is pretty cool although it looks like a recursive function at first ;)
On 20 May 2013 10:13, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
_lock = Lock()
def lprint(*a, **kw):
global _lock
with _lock:
On 20May2013 19:09, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
|_lock = Lock()
|
|def lprint(*a, **kw):
| global _lock
| with _lock:
|print(*a, **kw)
|
| and use lprint() everywhere?
|
| Fun little
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 18:35:20 +1000
From: c...@zip.com.au
To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
CC: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Please help with Threading
On 20May2013 10:53, Carlos Nepomuceno carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
| I just got my
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 20May2013 19:09, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
|_lock = Lock()
|
|def lprint(*a, **kw):
| global _lock
| with
On 5/20/13 1:04 AM, Vito De Tullio wrote:
FLTK? (http://www.fltk.org/index.php)
FLTK is even uglier than non-themed Tkinter: non-native on every
platform. Tkinter wraps native widgets on MacOS and WIndows, but FLTK
draws its own widgets everywhere.
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin/Mobile Code
Oh well! Just got a flashback from the old times at the 8-bit assembly line.
Dirty deeds done dirt cheap! lol
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 16:44:55 +0100
From: pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: How to write fast into a file
On 5/20/2013 6:09 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Referencing a function's own name in a default has to have one of
these interpretations:
1) It's a self-reference, which can be used to guarantee recursion
even if the name is rebound
2) It references whatever previously held that name before this def
On 05/20/2013 03:55 AM, Fábio Santos wrote:
My use case was a tight loop processing an image pixel by pixel, or
crunching a CSV file. If it only uses local variables (and probably hold a
lock before releasing the GIL) it should be safe, no?
Are you making function calls, using system
On 20/05/2013 10:07, Frank Millman wrote:
On 20/05/2013 09:55, Chris Angelico wrote:
Is it a requirement that they be able to key in a constraint as a
single string? We have a similar situation in one of the systems at
work, so we divided the input into three(ish) parts: pick a field,
pick an
=On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com wrote:
On 5/20/2013 6:09 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Referencing a function's own name in a default has to have one of
these interpretations:
1) It's a self-reference, which can be used to guarantee recursion
even if the
On Mon, 20 May 2013 15:26:02 +0200, Frank Millman wrote:
Can anyone see anything wrong with the following approach. I have not
definitely decided to do it this way, but I have been experimenting and
it seems to work.
I store the boolean test as a json'd list of 6-part tuples. Each element
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com wrote:
0 - for the first entry in the list, the word 'check' (a placeholder - it is
discarded at evaluation time), for any subsequent entries the word 'and' or
'or'.
1 - left bracket - either '(' or ''.
5 - right bracket -
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Personally, I would strongly suggest writing your own mini-
evaluator that walks the list and evaluates it by hand. It isn't as
convenient as just calling eval, but *definitely* safer.
Probably faster,
Non sense.
The discrete fft algorithm is valid only if the number of data
points you transform does correspond to a power of 2 (2**n).
Keywords to the problem: apodization, zero filling, convolution
product, ...
eg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convolution
jmf
--
Am 20.05.13 19:23, schrieb jmfauth:
Non sense.
Dito.
The discrete fft algorithm is valid only if the number of data
points you transform does correspond to a power of 2 (2**n).
Where did you get this? The DFT is defined for any integer point number
the same way.
Just if you want to get
Oops, I thought we were posting to comp.dsp. Nevertheless, I think
numpy.fft does mixed-radix (can't check it now)
Am 20.05.13 19:50, schrieb Christian Gollwitzer:
Am 20.05.13 19:23, schrieb jmfauth:
Non sense.
Dito.
The discrete fft algorithm is valid only if the number of data
points
We use github and we work on many different branches at the same time.
The problem is that we have 5 repos now, and for each repo we might
have the same branches on all of them.
Now we use pip and install requirements such as:
git+ssh://g...@github.com/repo.git@dev
Now the problem is that the
I didn't know that.
On 20 May 2013 12:10, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
Are you making function calls, using system libraries, or creating or
deleting any objects? All of these use the GIL because they use common
data structures shared among all threads. At the lowest level, creating an
TBH, I think that the first thing that I did that made me feel that I
could hold my own was when I had my first (and only thus far) patch
accepted into the stdlib. To me, there's a /big/ difference between
throwing together a package that a few people may find useful and
putting a patch together
Hi Demian,
Can I ask what you mean by working through the stdlib? As in writing
code pieces utilizing each module from the stdlib? Also, you're
talking about patches in the stdlib? Is there a separate library of
patches? Forgive me if I'm google-failing hard over here.
--
On 5/20/2013 3:36 PM, Thomas Murphy wrote:
talking about patches in the stdlib? Is there a separate library of
patches?
http://bugs.python.org
http://docs.python.org/devguide/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2013-05-20, Terry Jan Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 5/20/2013 1:04 AM, Vito De Tullio wrote:
Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
Do you think tkinter is going to be the standard python built-in gui
solution as long as python exists?
AT the moment, there is nothing really comparable that is a
Chris Angelico於 2013年5月20日星期一UTC+8下午5時09分13秒寫道：
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
_lock = Lock()
def lprint(*a, **kw):
global _lock
with _lock:
print(*a, **kw)
and use lprint() everywhere?
Fun little
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:44 AM, 8 Dihedral
dihedral88...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK, if the python interpreter has a global hiden print out
buffer of ,say, 2to 16 K bytes, and all string print functions
just construct the output string from the format to this string
in an efficient low
On Monday, May 20, 2013 2:05:48 AM UTC-5, Frank Millman wrote:
Hi all
I am trying to emulate a SQL check constraint in Python. Quoting from
the PostgreSQL docs, A check constraint is the most generic constraint
type. It allows you to specify that the value in a certain column must
sys.stdout.write() does not suffer from the newlines mess up when printing from
many threads, like print statement does.
The only usage difference, AFAIK, is to add '\n' at the end of the string.
It's faster and thread safe (really?) by default.
BTW, why I didn't find the source code to the
On 20May2013 15:05, Avnesh Shakya avnesh.n...@gmail.com wrote:
| Thanks a lot.
No worries, but ...
AGAIN:
- please DO NOT top post. Post below, trimming the quoted material.
- please POST TO THE LIST, not just to me. This is a public discussion.
Now...
| I did something.
| I have created
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:44 AM, 8 Dihedral
dihedral88...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK, if the python interpreter has a global hiden print out
buffer of ,say, 2to 16 K bytes, and all string print functions
just construct the output string from the format to this string
in an efficient low
Thanks a lot. I got it.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 20May2013 15:05, Avnesh Shakya avnesh.n...@gmail.com wrote:
| Thanks a lot.
No worries, but ...
AGAIN:
- please DO NOT top post. Post below, trimming the quoted material.
- please POST
On Tue, 21 May 2013 05:53:46 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
BTW, why I didn't find the source code to the sys module in the 'Lib'
directory?
Because sys is a built-in module. It is embedded in the Python
interpreter.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Is there a way to format integers with thousands separator (digit grouping)
like the format specifier of str.format()?
I'm currently using the following:
sys.stdout.write('Number = %s\n' % '{:,.0f}'.format(x))
Number = 12,345
'x' is unsigned integer so it's like using a sledgehammer to crack
In article blu176-w10190cb892a0414c988a05d7...@phx.gbl,
Carlos Nepomuceno carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
Is there a way to format integers with thousands separator (digit grouping)
like the format specifier of str.format()?
I'm currently using the following:
sys.stdout.write('Number
On 21/05/2013 04:39, matt.newvi...@gmail.com wrote:
You might find the asteval module (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/asteval) useful. It
provides a relatively safe eval, for example:
import asteval
a = asteval.Interpreter()
a.eval('x = abc')
a.eval('x in (abc, xyz)')
Larry Hastings added the comment:
I would, but I can't get it to apply cleanly, either to tip or to historical
revisions back in Sepember. Kaleb, what revision is the branch that you
generated the diff from?
--
___
Python tracker
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
David: not sure. I don't think I'd go for it---I think the cure is worse than
the disease.
I think the FAQ is why it fails when the extend succeeds
Agreed.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Florent Xicluna:
I noticed the convenient ``html.escape`` in Python 3.2 and ``cgi.escape`` is
marked as deprecated.
However, the former is an order of magnitude slower than the latter.
$ python3 --version
Python 3.3.2
With html.escape:
$ python3 -m timeit -s from html
Florent Xicluna added the comment:
Eric, this last one is not a bug in Cookie. This is a limitation with Python 2.
See #18012.
--
nosy: +flox
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16611
Graham Dumpleton added the comment:
Importing the cgi module the first time even in Python 2.X was always very
expensive. I would suggest you redo the test using timing done inside of the
script after modules have been imported so as to properly separate module
import time in both cases from
Florent Xicluna added the comment:
I would suggest you redo the test using timing done inside of the script
after modules have been imported.
The -s switch takes care of this.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Jaakko Moisio added the comment:
The test pass with Python 3 which does not use the FILE* API
anymore. So you should maybe migrate to Python 3 :-)
Yes. I will eventually. But not all the libraries I'm using are migrated yet.
--
Added file:
Larry Hastings added the comment:
p.s. Thanks for reviving the patch. I forgot about this one!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16024
___
Graham Dumpleton added the comment:
Whoops. Missed the quoting.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18020
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Ronald Oussoren added the comment:
David: your update to the FAQ looks ok to me.
I don't like updating the __setitem__ of tuple to allow setting an identical
value (that is 'a[0] = a[0]'), it is a bit too magic to my taste and hides the
real problem.
I'd slightly prefer my idea: update the
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
it is a bit too magic to my taste and hides the real problem.
Agreed. I do wonder whether there's a solution that allows the operation to
succeed, though.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Ronald Oussoren added the comment:
issue-17973-experimental.txt is a very crude first attempt at catching augment
assignment to an immutable LHS. On first glance the code works, but it causes
problems in the test suite and hence isn't correct yet. The generated code also
isn't optimal, the
Ronald Oussoren added the comment:
Allowing the operation to succeed wouldn't be right, you are assigning to an
immutable location after all.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17973
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Unfortunately, I don't think the checking first approach can work either: in
the case where the object *does* accept assignments, it will now be assigned to
twice. If there are side-effects from those assignments, then that will change
behaviour.
An
Changes by Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us:
--
nosy: +ethan.furman
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18011
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17973
___
___
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment:
what if we try the assignment, and catch TypeError only if __iadd__ returned
self?
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17973
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 5e0c56557390 by Charles-Francois Natali in branch 'default':
Issue #17914: Add os.cpu_count(). Patch by Yogesh Chaudhari, based on an
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5e0c56557390
--
nosy: +python-dev
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Yes, it doesn't seem that expat cares too much about propagating errors from
every single handler. Digging in its code comments, it says that even when
XML_StopParser is called, some event handlers (like the one for end element)
may still be called since
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
Alright, committed.
Yogesh, thanks for the patch!
I'm attaching a patch to replace several occurrences of
multiprocessing.cpu_count() by os.cpu_count() in the stdlib/test
suite.
--
Added file:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
TreeBuilder is an interface users can implement. As such, 'tag' is a
convenience the user-defined tree builder can use, as in:
class Target(object):
def start(self, tag, attrib):
print('i see start', tag)
def end(self, tag):
print('i
STINNER Victor added the comment:
In my patch cpu_count.patch, I changed posix_cpu_count():
* rewrite Mac OS X implementation: code in 5e0c56557390 looks wrong. It gets a
MIB but then don't use it when calling _bsd_cpu_count(). But I didn't check my
patch nor the commit version on Mac OS X.
New submission from Madison May:
The links at http://docs.python.org/devguide/documenting.html#building-doc and
http://docs.python.org/devguide/docquality.html to
http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/APStyleGuide/APSG_2009.pdf
lead to a Page Not Found
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
In 3.3+ there's no distinction between wide and narrow builds. Does anyone know
how this should be affected? [I don't know much about unicode and encodings,
unfortunately]
--
___
Python tracker
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
The ET docs have been significantly revamped in 3.3
I don't think cET needs to be documented. It's just confusing.
--
resolution: - wont fix
stage: commit review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python
Changes by Madison May madison@students.olin.edu:
--
type: enhancement - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18021
___
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Ping.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17900
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
import quopri, email.quoprimime
quopri.decodestring(b'==41')
b'=41'
email.quoprimime.decode('==41')
'=A'
I don't see a rule about double '=' in RFC 1521-1522 or RFCs 2045-2047 and I
think quopri is wrong.
Other half of this bug (encoding '=' as '==')
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 20409786cf8e by Andrew Kuchling in branch 'default':
#17955: minor updates to Functional howto
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/20409786cf8e
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by A.M. Kuchling li...@amk.ca:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17955
___
___
Changes by A.M. Kuchling li...@amk.ca:
--
stage: commit review - committed/rejected
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17955
___
___
Michael Fox added the comment:
I was thinking about this line:
end = self._buffer.find(b\n, self._buffer_offset) + 1
Might be a bug? For example, is there a unicode where one of several
bytes is '\n'? In this case it splits the line in the middle of a
character, right?
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ncoghlan
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8743
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ncoghlan
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset b363473cfe9c by R David Murray in branch '3.3':
#17973: Add FAQ entry for ([],)[0] += [1] both extending and raising.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b363473cfe9c
New changeset 6d2f0edb0758 by R David Murray in branch 'default':
Merge #17973: Add
R. David Murray added the comment:
You still have the side effect problem, as far as I can see.
I'm going to close this doc issue, if you guys do come up with some clever fix,
you can reopen it again :)
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open -
Nadeem Vawda added the comment:
No, that is the intended behavior for binary streams - they operate at
the level of individual byes. If you want to treat your input file as
Unicode-encoded text, you should open it in text mode. This will return a
TextIOWrapper which handles the decoding and line
Jed Brown added the comment:
Undefined variables are still a problem:
$ echo 'FROTZ = ${CFLAGS}' make.py3
$ python3
Python 3.3.1 (default, Apr 6 2013, 19:03:55)
[GCC 4.8.0] on linux
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import distutils.sysconfig
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +flox
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset a85ac58e9eaf by Charles-Francois Natali in branch 'default':
Issue #17914: Remove OS-X special-case, and use the correct int type.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a85ac58e9eaf
--
___
Python tracker
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment:
encoding=GBK causes a buffer overflow in PyUnknownEncodingHandler, because
the result of PyUnicode_Decode() is only 192 characters long.
Exact behavior is not defined...
--
___
Python tracker
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset f9d815522cdb by Charles-Francois Natali in branch 'default':
Issue #17914: We can now inline _bsd_cpu_count().
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f9d815522cdb
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
