Dear,
I just wrote a sample like this:
testPy/
__init__.py
client.py
SoamFactory.c
SoamFactory.so
soamapi.py
sample/testP.py
export PYTHONPATH=$(TEST_LOCATION):$(TEST_LOCATION)/testPy
Here's the source codes:
__init__.py:
import client
client.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Rhodri James wrote:
> 65536 is a suspiciously round number. You might want to double-
> check that there's no 16-bit overflow causing something unexpected.
It's because I'm using powers of 2. All the numbers in the report are
round in hex.
--
https://mail.pytho
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:45:52 -, Dan Stromberg
wrote:
blist.sorteddict was able to do 65536 operations on a dictionary
before taking more than 120 seconds to complete - it took 77.3
seconds to do 65536 operations.
65536 is a suspiciously round number. You might want to double-
check th
It seems that when I attempt to download blob or clob data using fetchmany, it
can not keep track of the LOB variable in subsequent fetch. The problem is over
if I fetch one row at a time but it is not optimal. Can anyone give me an idea
how to efficiently fetch columns with clob or blob data fr
In my GUI, the user enters two values: cellNumber(Integer) and
SerialNumber(String)
I have the following piece of code in my view/controller:
The following function is called after the user enters the
cellnumber and serial number##
def ListenForDetails(status):
The theme will be announced when the contest officially starts, the 15th
April.
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 09:27:14 UTC, audiowerk wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Is there already a date when the theme will be announced?
>
> Am Sonntag, 16. März 2014 18:42:16 UTC+1 schrieb qua-non:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Kivy
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ian Kelly :
>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> So complex(a, b) is documented to produce a+bj when a and b are integers
>>> or floats. What's more natural than saying it produces a+bj when a and b
>>> are comple
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> When is it ever useful though?
>
> About as often as int(0), float(0), or float(0.0) which all work as
> expected, though probably don't turn up in a lot of code.
The analogous call to t
On 03/18/2014 06:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:21:28 -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Marko Rauhamaa
wrote:
Dan Stromberg :
For a proper comparison, I'd like a fixed, identical dataset and set of
operations run against each data structure.
H
Hi!
Is there already a date when the theme will be announced?
Am Sonntag, 16. März 2014 18:42:16 UTC+1 schrieb qua-non:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Kivy will be holding it's programming contest for 2014 starting April 15th.
>
> For details please visit http://kivy.org/#contest
>
> If you are interested in
On 19/03/2014 14:43, Zachary Ware wrote:
Ironically, on my way down the November 2012 archive page, I noticed a
long thread about "Obnoxious postings from Google Groups".
Thankfully the number of grotty postings from gg has dropped
considerably. Sadly our resident unicode expert quite delibe
Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 12:04:06 UTC+1, Skip Montanaro a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> > When is it ever useful though?
>
>
>
> About as often as int(0), float(0), or float(0.0) which all work as
>
> expected, though probably don't turn up in a lot of code.
On 19/03/2014 13:11, diccon.tes...@gmail.com wrote:
> Your handling Pick Multi value fields aren't you ;)
> Just hit the same issue, thanks all here for various solutions.
> Interfacing with OpenQM / Scarlet DME here.
For future posts, please be sure to quote what you're replying to.
Google Groups
On 19/03/2014 13:11, diccon.tes...@gmail.com wrote:
Your handling Pick Multi value fields aren't you ;)
Just hit the same issue, thanks all here for various solutions.
Interfacing with OpenQM / Scarlet DME here.
The context is conspicious by its absence. In future would you please
be kind en
In article <53299eac$0$29994$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> If you have a million items, then the odds that those
> million items happen to be sorted (the worst-case order) are 1 in a
> million factorial. That's a rather small number, small enough that we can
>
Steven D'Aprano :
> Please re-read what I wrote. I didn't say "if your data comes to you
> fully randomized". I said "if you are in a position to randomize the
> data before storing it". In other words, if you actively randomize the
> data yourself.
Yes, you could implement a "hash table" that wa
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:49:33 +0200, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano :
>
>> If you are in a position to randomize the data before storing it in the
>> tree, an unbalanced binary tree is a solid contender.
>
> Applications that can assume randomly distributed data are exceedingly
> rare
Your handling Pick Multi value fields aren't you ;)
Just hit the same issue, thanks all here for various solutions.
Interfacing with OpenQM / Scarlet DME here.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I've released version 0.1.8 of distlib on PyPI [1]. For newcomers,
distlib is a library of packaging functionality which is intended
to be usable as the basis for third-party packaging tools.
The main changes in this release are as follows:
* Fixed issue #45: Improved thread-safety in SimpleScrap
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> When is it ever useful though?
About as often as int(0), float(0), or float(0.0) which all work as
expected, though probably don't turn up in a lot of code.
Skip
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ian Kelly :
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> So complex(a, b) is documented to produce a+bj when a and b are integers
>> or floats. What's more natural than saying it produces a+bj when a and b
>> are complex numbers? It's a straightforward generalization that in no
>>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
>
>> Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 09:51:20 UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa a écrit :
>>> wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
>>> complex(2, 1+1j)
>>> > (1+1j)
>>>
>>> I find it neat, actually.
>>
> # tricky: yes, neat: no
> complex(1+1j
===
>BREAKING NEWS
===
>
RICHARD LEAKEY JUST DIED DUE TO HEART FAILURE!
>
THE REASONS DESCRIBED BY THE MEDICAL TEAM IS THAT HIS WORK WAS
DISPROVEN, BY NONE OTHER THAN YOUR OWN BASTARD, THRINAXODON.
>
THIS CAUSED LEAKEY'S HEART TO EXPLODE!
>
THRINAXOD
wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
> Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 09:51:20 UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa a écrit :
>> wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
>> complex(2, 1+1j)
>> > (1+1j)
>>
>> I find it neat, actually.
>
# tricky: yes, neat: no
complex(1+1j, 2)
> (1+3j)
So complex(a, b) is documented to produce a+bj when
Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 09:51:20 UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa a écrit :
> wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
> > This is, in my mind, more questionable:
>
> >
>
> complex(2, 1+1j)
>
> > (1+1j)
>
>
>
> I find it neat, actually.
>
>
>
>
>
> Marko
>>> # tricky: yes, neat: no
>>> complex(1+1j, 2)
On 19/03/2014 08:55, muru kessan wrote:
> hi guys,
> i want the python interactive shell to be auto complete and i found that
> by adding the following lines in PYTHONSTARTUP file it is possible
>
> import rlcompleter, readline
> readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
>
> but i get the followin
hi guys,
i want the python interactive shell to be auto complete and i found that by
adding the following lines in PYTHONSTARTUP file it is possible
import rlcompleter, readline
readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
but i get the following error in git bash shell
Note: i run windows8 as Operat
wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
> This is, in my mind, more questionable:
>
complex(2, 1+1j)
> (1+1j)
I find it neat, actually.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven D'Aprano :
> If you are in a position to randomize the data before storing it in
> the tree, an unbalanced binary tree is a solid contender.
Applications that can assume randomly distributed data are exceedingly
rare and even then, you can't easily discount the possibility of
worst-case or
z = a + b*i with a, b, elements of R
z = r*exp(i*phi)with r, phi, elements of R
z = [[a, -b], [b, a]] with a, b, elements of R
This is, in my mind, more questionable:
>>> complex(2, 1+1j)
(1+1j)
>>>
>>> print(complex.__doc__)
complex(real[, imag]) -> complex number
Create a complex n
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Frank Millman wrote:
> I have decided to stick with Mercurial, simply because that is what I used
> in my previous attempt and I felt comfortable with it.
That's the best reason for choosing, really.
https://github.com/Rosuav/Gypsum/commit/0f973
> Also I believe t
31 matches
Mail list logo
