Hey everyone,
The rom package is a Redis object mapper for Python. It sports an
interface similar to Django's ORM, SQLAlchemy with the declarative base, or
Appengine's datastore.
The changelog for recent releases can be seen below my signature.
You can find the package at:
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.4 release
team, I'm pleased to announce the availability of Python 3.4.2. Python
3.4.2 has many bugfixes and other small improvements over 3.4.1. One
new feature for Mac OS X users: the OS X installers are now distributed
as
On 10/7/2014 9:41 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Every Python operator has a function version in the operator module:
operator + has function operator.add;
operator - has function operator.sub;
operator * has function operator.mul;
and so forth. Only, that's not quite right... according to the
James Smith wrote:
I want the last 1
I can't this to work:
pattern=re.compile( (\d+)$ )
match=pattern.match( LINE: 235 : Primary Shelf Number (attempt 1): 1)
print match.group()
pattern = re.compile((\d+)$)
match = pattern.search( LINE: 235 : Primary Shelf Number (attempt 1):
1)
Peter Otten __pete...@web.de writes:
pattern = re.compile((\d+)$)
match = pattern.search( LINE: 235 : Primary Shelf Number (attempt 1): 1)
match.group()
'1'
An alternative way to accomplish the above using the ‘match’ method::
import re
pattern = re.compile(^.*:(? *)(\d+)$)
Le mercredi 8 octobre 2014 01:40:11 UTC+2, MRAB a écrit :
If you're not interested in generating an actual regex, but only in
matching the prefix, then it sounds like you want partial matching.
The regex module supports that:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
Wow, thanks a lot!
For me it makes sense. operator.add should be used in a global context
(I don't know how to express it otherwise). So you provide it with the
two values that you want to add. The .__add__ variants are bound to a
particular instance and you provide it with a single value that you want
to add.
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.4 release
team, I'm pleased to announce the availability of Python 3.4.2. Python
3.4.2 has many bugfixes and other small improvements over 3.4.1. One
new feature for Mac OS X users: the OS X installers are now distributed
as
(You didn't include any context in your post. Please quote as much
text as would be helpful; it's the easiest way to show what you're
talking about.)
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:46 PM, marco.naw...@colosso.nl wrote:
For me it makes sense. operator.add should be used in a global context
(I don't
random832 wrote on Tue Oct 7 22:33:23 CEST 2014
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014, at 16:27, Michael Torrie wrote:
That's really interesting. I looked briefly at the page. How does your
python extension work with xywrite? Does it manipulate xywrite documents
or does it tie in at runtime with Xywrite
Here's another quick one -- under 30 secs. -- and then I'll revert to lurker
status. It's one of my favorites: Veritas wine liquor search. (Teetotalers,
avert your eyes.)
http://youtu.be/jDtm4z7kqyI
Pal A.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
The end result of a confusing sentence with no
context is that I have no idea what you are trying to say. Could you try
explaining again please?
Steven
No problem my reply from phone at work a little confusing.
So trying to determine what this does.
def ins_var
@ins_var ||= nil
On 10/7/2014 1:01 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 10/7/14 2:10 AM, Gelonida N wrote:
Disadvantage of itertools.product() is, that it makes a copy in memory.
Reason ist, that itertools also makes products of generators (meaning of
objects, that one can't iterate several times through)
There are
Hi,
I just read about sys.meta_path, which allows to install custom
importers *BEFORE* the default importers.
However I have a use case where I would like to add a custom importer
*AFTER* all other import methods have failed.
Does anybody know how to do this.
One way of implementing this
marco.naw...@colosso.nl wrote:
For me it makes sense. operator.add should be used in a global context
(I don't know how to express it otherwise). So you provide it with the
two values that you want to add. The .__add__ variants are bound to a
particular instance and you provide it with a
On 2014-10-07, Seymore4Head Seymore4Head@Hotmail.invalid wrote:
I never really cared enough to ask anyone, but something like my cable
bill is 98$ a month. Do companies (in general) consider a month every
30 days or every time the 14th comes around?
Either/both.
My pre-pay T-Mobile account
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 2:19:39 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I have fewer issues with your conclusion and analogy than I do with the
basic premise that there is a connection between Seymore's problem here
and the use, or non-use, of print in the interactive interpreter. I don't
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is not only that print is bad but that the interpreter is
good for learning and trying out.
Are these two really unconnected. Lets see... One can
- use print without the interpreter
- use the interpreter
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
So pushing beginners away from print can push them up the learning
curve more quickly
Or more quickly discourage them. I still use print for all sorts of
things. In my opinion, there is often no need for fancy loggers,
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 9:58:11 PM UTC+5:30, Skip Montanaro wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
So pushing beginners away from print can push them up the learning
curve more quickly
Or more quickly discourage them. I still use print for all sorts of
things. In
Chris Angelico wrote:
Sure, and that's all well and good. But what I just cited there *is* a
shipping product. That's a live server that runs a game that I'm admin
of. So it's possible to do without the resource safety net of periodic
restarts.
Nice that the non-Python server you administer
On 10/8/2014 6:57 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
According to the documentation, operator.__add__ is the official function,
and operator.add is just there for convenience.
You are paraphrasing The function names are those used for special
class methods; variants without leading and trailing __
This does not look right:
dilbert@gtrojan python3.4
Python 3.4.1 (default, Jul 7 2014, 15:47:25)
[GCC 4.8.3 20140624 (Red Hat 4.8.3-1)] on linux
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import numpy as np
a=np.ma.array([0, 1], dtype=np.int8, mask=[1, 0])
a
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:29 AM, George Trojan george.tro...@noaa.gov wrote:
This does not look right:
dilbert@gtrojan python3.4
Python 3.4.1 (default, Jul 7 2014, 15:47:25)
[GCC 4.8.3 20140624 (Red Hat 4.8.3-1)] on linux
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
On 10/08/2014 12:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/8/2014 6:57 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
According to the documentation, operator.__add__ is the official function,
and operator.add is just there for convenience.
You are paraphrasing The function names are those used for special class
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 15:38, Ethan Furman wrote:
LOL, no kidding! The main reason I bother using the operator module is
for the readability of not seeing the dunders,
and the writability of not having to type them.
I'm not sure what situation you would have to type them (as opposed to
On 10/8/2014 9:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/8/2014 6:57 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
According to the documentation, operator.__add__ is the official
function,
and operator.add is just there for convenience.
You are paraphrasing The function names are those used for special
class methods;
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/8/2014 9:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/8/2014 6:57 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
According to the documentation, operator.__add__ is the official
function,
and operator.add is just there for convenience.
You are
jonathan.slend...@gmail.com wrote:
For each non-accepting state, determine whether it has
any transitions that lead in one or more steps to an accepting state.
Modify the FSM so that each such state is also an accepting state.
Thanks, I'll make every state of the FSM an accepting state.
Chris Angelico wrote:
operator.add is operator.__add__
True
That doesn't always seem to have been the case, however.
In Python 2.7 and 3.3, I get
operator.add is operator.__add__
False
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[redirecting back to the list]
On 10/08/2014 02:23 PM, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 15:53, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 10/08/2014 12:49 PM, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 15:38, Ethan Furman wrote:
LOL, no kidding! The main reason I bother using the
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/8/2014 9:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/8/2014 6:57 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
According to the documentation, operator.__add__ is the official
function,
and operator.add is just there for convenience.
You are
random...@fastmail.us writes:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 15:38, Ethan Furman wrote:
The main reason I bother using the operator module is for the
readability of not seeing the dunders, and the writability of not
having to type them.
I'm not sure what situation you would have to type them
virtualenv has the switch
--system-site-packages (including all system site pacgaes)
and the switch
--no-site-packages (to expclude all site packages)
Does anyone know an easy way to include just a few site-packages?
for example (PySide, but not PyQt)
The reason I'm asking is following.
Some
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Gregory Ewing
greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
operator.add is operator.__add__
True
That doesn't always seem to have been the case, however.
In Python 2.7 and 3.3, I get
operator.add is operator.__add__
False
Huh. So it is.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't always seem to have been the case, however.
In Python 2.7 and 3.3, I get
operator.add is operator.__add__
False
Huh. So it is.
rosuav@sikorsky:~$ python3
Python 3.5.0a0 (default:301b9a58021c,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just read about sys.meta_path, which allows to install custom importers
*BEFORE* the default importers.
However I have a use case where I would like to add a custom importer
*AFTER* all other import methods have
On 10/8/2014 5:49 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
[redirecting back to the list]
I'm not sure what situation you would have to type them (as opposed to
simply a + b) that the operator module would help with.
unittest springs to mind:
self.assertRaises(TypeError, op.add, obj1, obj2)
Er, my
On 10/08/2014 03:46 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/8/2014 5:49 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
[redirecting back to the list]
I'm not sure what situation you would have to type them (as opposed to
simply a + b) that the operator module would help with.
unittest springs to mind:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
Here is one:
if color == Red:
color = Blue
else:
color = Red
Here is two:
if x = True color = Red
else:
color=Blue
x= not x
Others?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Seymore4Head Seymore4Head@Hotmail.invalid Wrote in message:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
Here is one:
if color == Red:
color = Blue
else:
color = Red
Here is two:
if x = True color = Red
else:
color=Blue
x= not x
Others?
One looks like
On 09/10/2014 01:11, Seymore4Head wrote:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
Here is one:
if color == Red:
color = Blue
else:
color = Red
Here is two:
if x = True color = Red
else:
color=Blue
x= not x
Others?
Here
Seymore4Head wrote:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
Here is one:
if color == Red:
color = Blue
else:
color = Red
Apart from the horrible spelling of colour :-) that seems fine to me. You
might wish to include a comment:
# Assumes that color can
On 10/8/14 5:49 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
[redirecting back to the list]
On 10/08/2014 02:23 PM, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 15:53, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 10/08/2014 12:49 PM, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 15:38, Ethan Furman wrote:
LOL, no
Seymore4Head Seymore4Head@Hotmail.invalid writes:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
It's good to cultivate ongoing familiarity with the standard library
URL:https://docs.python.org/3/library/itertools.html#itertools.cycle
so that you can make use of wheels already invented and
On Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:12:41 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
Seymore4Head writes:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
It's good to cultivate ongoing familiarity with the standard library
And language. In recent python3:
class Color(Enum):
... Red = 0
... Blue = 1
On 09/10/2014 02:25, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 09/10/2014 01:11, Seymore4Head wrote:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
Here is one:
if color == Red:
color = Blue
else:
color = Red
Here is two:
if x = True color = Red
else:
color=Blue
x= not x
Others?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 23:02, Mark Lawrence wrote:
When I first read this I was extremely jealous of the originator but
having used it umpteen times I'm still extremely jealous of the
originator!!! Why doesn't my mind work like his? :)
You could also keep the ints in two variables and do a
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:54 PM, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 23:02, Mark Lawrence wrote:
When I first read this I was extremely jealous of the originator but
having used it umpteen times I'm still extremely jealous of the
originator!!! Why doesn't my mind work like
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:34:30 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
Color.Red
Color.Red: 0
print (Color.Red)
Color.Red
# Not sure what to make of that distinction...
That's because the interactive interpreter displays the repr() of objects
(except for None, which it suppresses), while print outputs
Seymore4Head wrote:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
toggle = {Red: Blue, Blue: Red}
color = toggle[color]
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Oct 8, 2014, at 9:57 PM, Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Seymore4Head wrote:
I want to toggle between color=Red and color=Blue
Don’t forget polymorphic dispatch…
class Red(object):
def toggle(self):
return Blue()
class Blue(object):
def toggle(self):
On Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:26:41 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:34:30 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
Color.Red
print (Color.Red)
Color.Red
# Not sure what to make of that distinction...
That's because the interactive interpreter displays the repr() of
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:26:41 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:34:30 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
Color.Red
print (Color.Red)
Color.Red
# Not sure what to make of that distinction...
gladman added the comment:
You might be right that it is not worth adding the ability to handle a variable
number of parameters in the new gcd. But this depends on whether you are right
that this would add a significant burden to the implementation. I am not sure
that it would.
But for
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
I agree that having a high-level wrapper around a low-level C primitive would
be cool, but someone has to experiment on that to find out how much performance
it would cost.
You may want to have the C primitive return results in batches (of e.g. 10 or
100
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 4cc584d47c7d by Berker Peksag in branch '3.4':
Issue #22576: Fix signatures of FTP.storbinary() and FTP.storlines() methods.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4cc584d47c7d
New changeset f21f0de30544 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
Issue
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Fixed. Thanks for the report, Derek.
--
assignee: docs@python - berker.peksag
nosy: +berker.peksag
resolution: - fixed
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python
New submission from Xavier de Gaye:
With the following pdb_jump.py script:
def foo(x):
import pdb; pdb.set_trace()
lineno = 3
lineno = 4
foo(1)
The change made to 'x' is lost after a jump to line 4:
$ ./python ~/tmp/test/pdb_jump.py
~/tmp/test/pdb_jump.py(3)foo()
- lineno = 3
STINNER Victor added the comment:
You may want to have the C primitive return results in batches (of e.g. 10 or
100 entries) to limit the overhead, btw.
Ah yes, good idea. I read that internally readdir() also fetchs many
entries in a single syscall (prefetch / readahead, I don't know how
to
Christian Heimes added the comment:
Let's not be early adopters here. I suggest we wait until glibc has a proper
interface.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22181
___
Ben Hoyt added the comment:
Thanks for the initial response and code review, Victor. I'll take a look and
respond further in the next few days.
In the meantime, however, I'm definitely open to splitting scandir out into its
own C file. This will mean a little refactoring (making some
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
Proposed patch adds additional attributes to the re.error exception: msg,
pattern, pos, colno, lineno. It also adds helpful information to error message.
Examples:
re.compile(rabc\u123)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
components: +Regular Expressions
nosy: +ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, pitrou
stage: - patch review
type: - enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
title: Add addition attributes to re.error - Add additional attributes to
re.error
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22578
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Sounds ok, but it would be nice to add some tests.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22578
___
New submission from Jeffrey Armstrong:
The determination of the name of the posix module's initialization function (at
Modules/posixmodule.c:12055) is currently dependent on the compiler being
used. For MSVC, Watcom, or Borland, the name is defined as PyInit_nt.
However, both Open Watcom
700eb415 added the comment:
OpenBSD already provides high quality pseudorandom numbers from arc4random(). I
don't think this would make us early adopters since it has been around for
some time on this platform.
It's also worth mentioning that getentropy() is not recommended in use for
normal
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22181
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
This issue is about Linux support. Does the glibc have arc4random? I can't find
it on my Ubuntu 13.10 system.
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22181
Alex Gaynor added the comment:
As I said on the other ticket, using arc4random() indiscriminately would be a
very poor idea, on some platforms (such as OS X) arc4random() really does use
ARC4, which means there are serious security concerns with it.
--
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Sounds ok, but it would be nice to add some tests.
Thank you. Here is a patch with added test.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36836/re_error_attrs2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
700eb415 added the comment:
While I agree it may not be wise to use arc4random() globally, OpenBSD is
unlikely to create a duplicate interface since it's already available.
Python is currently unusable in chroots on that platform without reducing the
security of the host partition by removing
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Since this is a Linux-specific issue (see the title), you should create a
separate issue for OpenBSD support. Bonus points if you want to submit a patch
as well :-)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Alexander Belopolsky added the comment:
I've updated the patch.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36837/issue7830-2.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7830
New submission from Josh Ayers:
The documentation for PyUnicode_Tailmatch says it returns an int:
https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/unicode.html?highlight=pyunicode_tailmatch#c.PyUnicode_Tailmatch
However, the include file shows it returns Py_ssize_t:
Julien Pagès added the comment:
Hi all,
I would like to contribute to Python and I'm interested in working on this. I
have few questions (I hope you don't mind that I ask here):
- is this issue still open and needed ?
- if yes, do I have to work from 3.3 branch, as stated in the issue
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
In addition to issue16518. There are other non-fixed messages (may be
introduced after 3.3):
b''.join([''])
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: sequence item 0: expected bytes, bytearray, or an object with the
Matěj Stuchlík added the comment:
FYI I'm seeing the error with the new 3.4.2 release as well.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/599/7800599/build.log
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22327
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Hi Julien and welcome,
- is this issue still open and needed ?
Yes and perhaps. I have no opinion on whether it is necessary, but other
people seem to think it's useful.
- if yes, do I have to work from 3.3 branch, as stated in the issue
Versions field,
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
assignee: michael.foord -
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11664
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 5433ef907e4f by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.4':
Issue #22462: Fix pyexpat's creation of a dummy frame to make it appear in
exception tracebacks.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5433ef907e4f
New changeset f2f13aeb590a by Antoine Pitrou in branch
700eb415 added the comment:
I'm reopening this for now as advised from the Linux getrandom() thread.
I agree we should not be using arc4random() blindly. However, in the long run
it is a necessary change at least on OpenBSD. OpenBSD is not likely to create
another syscall to avoid portability
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
components: +Interpreter Core -Build
resolution: duplicate -
stage: - needs patch
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22542
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
title: Use syscall (eg. arc4random or getentropy) rather than /dev/urandom when
possible - Use arc4random under OpenBSD for os.urandom()
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Could anyone please test it on Windows?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22526
___
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Patch pushed. I've kept the changes together :) Hopefully there won't be any
ctypes regression.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Julien Pagès added the comment:
Thanks Antoine for the link, and the quick answer;
It seems that it is a sensible subject, adding or not this method, and what it
should do. I wrote the patch anyway, but I must confess that somewhere it
feels strange to me to add such a method in TestCase
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - wont fix
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22550
___
Kevin Dyer added the comment:
The following can be used to generate a file called ```mega_concat.py```:
```python
N = 2**17
my_array = []
for i in range(N):
my_array.append(\\)
print '+'.join(my_array)
```
Then:
```console
$ python mega_concat.py
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ python3
New submission from Kevin Dyer:
The following can be used to generate a file called ```mega_concat.py```:
```python
N = 2**17
my_array = []
for i in range(N):
my_array.append(\\)
print '+'.join(my_array)
```
Then:
```console
$ python mega_concat.py
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ python3
New submission from Kevin Dyer:
The following can be used to generate a file called mega_concat.py:
N = 2**17
my_array = []
for i in range(N):
my_array.append(\\)
print '+'.join(my_array)
Then, on Ubuntu 14.04, 32-bit:
$ python mega_concat.py
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ python3
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
From Anaury's report, this is fixed in 2.7. Email in current 3.x has been
re-written.
--
nosy: +terry.reedy
resolution: - fixed
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
stage: - resolved
title: Segmentation fault with string concatenation - RuntimeError with string
concatenation
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22582
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
The leak had been fixed in #9450.
There are still the remaining issues of:
- better testing for the readline module, and
- attempting to work around libedit bugs.
Perhaps those should become separate issues, though?
If those are current issues and anyone
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I tried to re-title to describe the enhancement proposal. There are multiple
API proposals in the two messages above.
--
nosy: +terry.reedy
stage: - needs patch
title: PyUnicode_AsWideCharString() increases string size - Make
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 9af21752ea2a by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4':
Issue #21715: Extracted shared complicated code in the _io module to new
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9af21752ea2a
New changeset 8b1ac1a3d007 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default':
Issue
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Actually 3.5 patch can be simpler.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36839/re_ignore_case_range-3.5_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17381
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Thank you for the review Antoine.
--
assignee: - serhiy.storchaka
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - resolved
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
assignee: effbot -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1519638
___
___
Python-bugs-list
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
