Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Any more comments on this? The deadlines for new features in Py3.5 are getting
closer. It seems we're just discussing details here, but pretty much everyone
wants this feature.
So, what are the things that still need to be done? Serhiy submitted working
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
PEP 489 (Redesigning extension module loading) includes the proposal to fix
this by using punycode.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20485
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
stage: commit review - resolved
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23342
___
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 050e0c0b3d90 by Berker Peksag in branch '2.7':
Issue #23356: Simplify convert_arg_line_to_args example.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/050e0c0b3d90
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Thanks py.user.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23356
___
Changes by Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23852
___
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
stage: commit review - resolved
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9951
___
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset bd8b99034121 by Berker Peksag in branch '3.4':
Issue #23356: Simplify convert_arg_line_to_args example.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bd8b99034121
New changeset 2d3ed019bc9f by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
Issue #23356: Simplify
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 7df280b311d0 by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.4':
Fix computation of max_fd on OpenBSD. Issue #23852.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7df280b311d0
New changeset 08d0cc23fb00 by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'default':
Fix computation of max_fd on
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Any more comments on the patch, or can it be applied?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22881
___
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
stage: patch review - resolved
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23852
___
___
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +easy
stage: - needs patch
title: document urllib.urlretrieve - Add docstring to urllib.urlretrieve
type: - enhancement
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like Tkinter
is slightly better. What would be the pros/cons of these two? Would
there be a compelling reason to use another GUI?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 01:00 am, Φώντας Λαδοπρακόπουλος wrote:
Hello,
Can you please tell me how to install latest Python 3.4.x without
disturbing the other default python v2.7.5 intallation that i currently
have on my VPS server and access it as Python 3?
Thank you.
Not unless you tell us
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like Tkinter
is slightly better. What would be the pros/cons of these two? Would
there be a compelling reason to
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 15c80f63ea1c by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.4':
Issue #23996: Avoid a crash when a delegated generator raises an unnormalized
StopIteration exception. Patch by Stefan Behnel.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/15c80f63ea1c
New changeset
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Does simply removing the extern work?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24058
___
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Thanks for the patch!
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
versions: -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23996
Changes by Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +demian.brecht
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13567
___
___
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 15:02 CEST schreef Cecil Westerhof:
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like
Tkinter is slightly better. What would be the pros/cons of these
two? Would there be a compelling reason
Gregory P. Smith added the comment:
This seems somewhat related to the We need to document Python's concurrency
and memory model that came out at the language summit this year.
--
nosy: +gregory.p.smith
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Stefan Behnel sco...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23996
___
___
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 7:53:27 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, richm...@gmail.com wrote:
The solution ended up being editing the top-level __init__.py:
import awesome
and then *when in a subdirectory*:
import awesome_lib as awesome
and
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Could we have type slots for the new special methods? Otherwise, implementing
the protocol in C would be fairly inefficient, especially for async iteration.
I'm asking because Cython's generator type is not Python's generator type, but
implementing the rest of
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Okay, I give up.
--
resolution: - rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24059
___
Mario Figueiredo mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Other than replacing the random module with the probability density
function for the exponential distribution, do you have a suggestion of
how I could smooth the curve?
Moving average. Try:
def movingaverage(interval, window_size):
window=
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:17:07 +0100, Dave Farrance
davefarra...@omitthisyahooandthis.co.uk wrote:
Moving average. Try:
def movingaverage(interval, window_size):
window= numpy.ones(int(window_size))/float(window_size)
return numpy.convolve(interval, window, 'same')
y_av =
Ludovic Gasc added the comment:
Sorry guys to be basic for you, but if I take my AsyncIO end-user hat, I'm
not sure to understand the potential end-user source code impacts to use Cython
with Python 3.5 and AsyncIO.
In concrete terms, it's only a low-level change, Cython will monkeypatch
Changes by Hanno Boeck ha...@hboeck.de:
--
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24061
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Hanno Boeck:
Right now it is not possible to build python 2.7.9 with address sanitizer. This
issue has been worked around for python 3 in bug #18596 by marking some
functions with attributes to tell address sanitizer to ignore them.
I have attached a patch that will apply
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
In fact I will likely add tp_await in the next PEP iteration. I need it to
implement another feature.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24017
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Therefore, I think it's important to cover the complete protocol
in the Generator ABC. I also think it's helpful to not require
users to override throw() in a subclass, as they might not need it.
Sorry, but I think you're fighting the fundament nature of
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
One other thought: the itemgetter.__call__ method is already pretty thin:
if (!PyArg_UnpackTuple(args, itemgetter, 1, 1, obj))
return NULL;
if (nitems == 1)
return PyObject_GetItem(obj, ig-item);
But you could add a special case for
STINNER Victor added the comment:
mopidy is not maintained by Python. Report the bug to mopidy authors:
https://www.mopidy.com/
--
nosy: +haypo
resolution: - not a bug
status: open - closed
title: Segmentation fault (core dumped) - [2.7] crash in third party module
mopidy
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes:
Tkinter is easier to use, as it is standard with Python. So long as
you have Tk/Tcl installed on your computer, Tkinter should work fine.
However,
Seymore4Head Seymore4Head@Hotmail.invalid writes:
Anyone here worked on trying a better strategy?
If you want us to spend the time visiting a link, please spend the time
yourself to summarise why it's relevant here. Do so in the initial post
with the link.
--
\ “Some mornings, it's just
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 4234b0dd2a54 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '2.7':
allow 2.7 to be built with asan (closes #24061)
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4234b0dd2a54
--
nosy: +python-dev
resolution: - fixed
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
Joe Jevnik added the comment:
I was unable to see a performance increase by playing with the
itemgetter.__call__ code; however, updating the propery code seemed to show a
small improvement. I think that for simple indexing the cost of checking if it
is a sequence outways the faster dispatch
Wolfgang Maier added the comment:
for the even number case, I think you shouldn't do // 2, but / 2.
In general, wouldn't it be good to let the statistics module do all the stats
calculations?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
PEP 342 isn't really conclusive here as it intended to define the protocol
based on the de-facto design of a yield-based generator function. Trying to
abstract from that poses the question how a class based generator
implementation should look like.
Wolfgang Maier added the comment:
ah sorry, it's late here already and I forgot what file this change is about.
So forget my last comment then.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22881
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
FWIW, the current property(itemgetter(index)) code has a Python creation step,
but the actual attribute lookup and dispatch is done entirely in C (no pure
python steps around the eval lookup).
Rather than making a user visible C hack directly to
Antti Haapala added the comment:
+1 for this patch, the current documentation states it very wrong.
--
nosy: +ztane
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22057
___
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Timing results on my machine:
(Canopy 64bit) taniyama:~ mdickinson$ python3 -m timeit -s from math import
sqrt; x = 3.14 sqrt(x)
1000 loops, best of 3: 0.0426 usec per loop
(Canopy 64bit) taniyama:~ mdickinson$ python3 -m timeit -s from math import
sqrt;
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
Could we have type slots for the new special methods? Otherwise, implementing
the protocol in C would be fairly inefficient, especially for async iteration.
I don't think it's necessary to have slots for __aiter__, __anext__, __aenter__
and __aexit__.
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 23:33:10 +0100, Mario Figueiredo wrote:
plot(list(results.keys()), list(results.values()))
I found multiple plots in matplotlib. You need to specify which one
you're using.
The first thing you need to do is create a small self contained example
of your problem.
State
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
In the lastest patch, the close() method is now a valid mixin method.
However, the throw() method should be made abstract because it doesn't provide
the required operation (it doesn't even use the self argument) or it should
be left out entirely (i.e.
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset ec6ed10d611e by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.4':
remove extern definition, since it's in a header file (closes #24058)
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ec6ed10d611e
New changeset 192f9efe4a38 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '2.7':
remove extern
On 04/26/2015 11:07 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 19:12 CEST schreef Gary Herron:
On 04/26/2015 09:32 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 17:09 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I want to use a GUI for
John Hergenroeder added the comment:
It looks like my contributor form has gone through -- what should my next steps
here be? Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23796
Changes by Wolfgang Maier wolfgang.ma...@biologie.uni-freiburg.de:
--
nosy: +wolma
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22881
___
___
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes:
Tkinter is easier to use, as it is standard with Python. So long as
you have Tk/Tcl installed on your computer, Tkinter should work fine.
However, Tkinter probably looks a bit more old fashioned.
It doesn't have to. By using the
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
In general, wouldn't it be good to let the statistics module do all the stats
calculations?
It's not available in older Python versions, e.g. 2.6.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Wolfgang Maier added the comment:
It's not available in older Python versions, e.g. 2.6.
I know, I was talking about 3.5+, of course. This would not be backported to
Python2 anyway, would it?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48EWLj3gIJ8
Anyone here worked on trying a better strategy?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24061
___
___
Python-bugs-list
On 04/26/2015 09:32 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 17:09 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Ah, I missed that the issue was already closed. Apologies for the excitement
and the gratuitous exclamation marks in my previous messages.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Rémi Verschelde:
Support for Mageia and Arch Linux was added in the platform module for Python
3.x [1, 2], but the fix was not backported to the 2.7.x branch.
It would be nice to see these fixes cherry-picked for the incoming 2.7.10
release.
[1]
Cyd Haselton added the comment:
On a related note, I managed to get pip working with this build...minus some
errors with verbose mode. I first had to make some edits to setup.py and
Modules/Setup so that the build would find and make the _ssl and lzip modules.
After running make install, I
Tim Peters added the comment:
Good catch, Mark!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24059
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
New submission from July Tikhonov:
Documentation of os.fstat()
https://docs.python.org/3/library/os.html#os.fstat
has a See also: section, which features a wrong link. The same with
os.lstat().
Some of this problem was fixed (among other things) in issue 10960. But since
then, two more wrong
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 18:55:27 + (UTC), Denis McMahon
denismfmcma...@gmail.com wrote:
The first thing you need to do is create a small self contained example
of your problem.
State the problem: Plot does not create the output you expect.
Give an example:
plot( [1,11], [5,5] )
Explain what
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 17:09 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like
Tkinter is slightly better. What would be the
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Per: yes, that's true. I don't think changing either division or multiplication
is the way forward for this issue, though; I'd rather implement the less
invasive change where `cmath.log` special-cases the situation where its second
argument is real and
paul rubin added the comment:
Hey, thanks for updating this. I still remember the nasty incident that got me
filing this report in the first place. I'll look at the patch more closely
when I get a chance, but the immediate comment I'd make is it's worth adding a
sentence saying explicitly
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 19:12 CEST schreef Gary Herron:
On 04/26/2015 09:32 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 17:09 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside
some others)
Masayuki Yamamoto added the comment:
I tried another two case changing variable declaration.
First case of just removing extern, Compiler similarly warns, and test passed.
Second case of removing _PyOS_ReadlineTState declaration, Compiler has not
warned, and test passed.
First:
$ hg diff
diff
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Those should be in the os module, not in sys. The os module is for interfaces
to the operating system, while the sys module is for Python-specific stuff.
As for the point of adding them, I don't find them useful, but I won't oppose
it either :-)
--
On 26/04/2015 17:16, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 15:02 CEST schreef Cecil Westerhof:
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like
Tkinter is slightly better. What would be the pros/cons of
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Gah! Peephole optimizer! When you do a timeit for '3.14 ** 0.5', you're just
evaluating the time to retrieve a constant!
In general, `**` is going to be both slower *and* less accurate than math.sqrt.
Please don't make this change!
--
But just curious: what is the reason you use five different kinds of
GUI? It seems like it makes think difficult for you. I mean the
question as enlightenment for myself.
A good question :). Most of this comes from the openness to create binding for
many projects. Tkinter is a binding of
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
I think the throw() method should be required.
If you don't need throw(), send() or close(), then you aren't really asking for
a full-blown generator: you are asking for an iterator, so you can just check
for collections.Iterator.
(PS: why is this bug
Christie added the comment:
@serhiy.storchaka - just double checking, do you guys need me to make any more
changes to the patch?
And is there any more review needed, or is it possible for this to be merged?
Thanks very much!
--
___
Python tracker
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
If you have a chance, run a C profiler so we can see whether most of the time
is being spent in an attribute lookup for the current property(itemgetter)
approach versus your nt-indexer approach. Without a profile, I have only my
instincts that the
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:40:04 +1000, Ben Finney
ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Seymore4Head Seymore4Head@Hotmail.invalid writes:
Anyone here worked on trying a better strategy?
If you want us to spend the time visiting a link, please spend the time
yourself to summarise why it's relevant
On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 7:11:08 AM UTC+5:30, Seymore4Head wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:40:04 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Seymore4Head writes:
Anyone here worked on trying a better strategy?
If you want us to spend the time visiting a link, please spend the time
yourself to
Joe Jevnik added the comment:
This was very exciting, I have never run gprof before; so just to make sure I
did this correctly, I will list my steps:
1. compile with the -pg flag set
1. run the test with ./python -m timeit ...
1. $ gprof python gmon.out profile.out
Here is default:
Each
Robert Collins added the comment:
Nice, looks pretty elegant to me. I have nothing to add to the prior reviewers
comments.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22619
___
(Redirecting to the list - hope you don't mind)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Makoto Kuwata k...@kuwata-lab.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree it would be nice to have extra parameters directly handled,
but before you go further
Changes by Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23668
___
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
FWIW, here's a proposed new classmethod that makes it possible to easily
customize the field docstrings but without cluttering the API of the factory
function:
@classmethod
def _set_docstrings(cls, **docstrings):
'''Customize the field
On 04/27, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
I feel that function decorator having arguments is complicated,
because three 'def' are nested:
def multiply(n):
def deco(func):
def newfunc(*args, **kwargs):
return n * func(*args, **kwargs)
return newfunc
return deco
When
Steve Dower added the comment:
Made some updates to the patch to use the existing infrastructure for setting
include and library paths, and to fix bdist_wininst.
While it may be worth doing more significant restructuring to help people with
overriding aspects of build, that's almost certainly
On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 6:41:08 PM UTC-7, Seymore4Head wrote:
Richard Dawkins explains with passion the idea of game theory and tit
for tat, or why cooperation with strangers is often a strong strategy.
He talks of a computer program tournament. I don't know what I could
say that
On 04/27, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 04/27, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
I feel that function decorator having arguments is complicated,
because three 'def' are nested:
def multiply(n):
def deco(func):
def newfunc(*args,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
What's the advantage of that over a simple closure? You have the same
number of nesting levels, plus a lot more boiler-plate repetition -
instead of just referencing names from the outer scope, you have to
explicitly
Elizabeth Myers added the comment:
For what it's worth, IRC has an optional STARTTLS extension which is
implemented by some servers. IMAP and SMTP also have STARTTLS as a fundamental
component of their protocols. As gc pointed out, LDAP also supports it.
IMO this is a pretty glaring omission.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 04/27, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
I feel that function decorator having arguments is complicated,
because three 'def' are nested:
def multiply(n):
def deco(func):
def newfunc(*args, **kwargs):
return
New submission from Raymond Hettinger:
I can't see any reason for property docstrings to be readonly:
p = property(doc='basic')
p.__doc__
'basic'
p.__doc__ = 'extended'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#46, line 1, in module
p.__doc__ =
I want to ask Python experts about function decorator which has arguments.
I feel that function decorator having arguments is complicated,
because three 'def' are nested:
def multiply(n):
def deco(func):
def newfunc(*args, **kwargs):
return n * func(*args, **kwargs)
Seymore4Head Seymore4Head@Hotmail.invalid writes:
Richard Dawkins explains with passion the idea of game theory and tit
for tat, or why cooperation with strangers is often a strong strategy.
He talks of a computer program tournament.
Thanks! That is what would be great to have when you
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Makoto Kuwata k...@kuwata-lab.com wrote:
If function decorator notation could take arguments,
decorator definition would be more simple:
def multiply(func, n):
def newfunc(*args, **kwargs):
return n * func(*args, **kwargs)
return newfunc
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
I'm with Raymond.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Elizabeth Myers added the comment:
What needs to be done to make this happen? I can try to implement it.
--
nosy: +Elizacat
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23749
___
95 matches
Mail list logo
