On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2015 12:19, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
>>> There's nothing Windows-specific about that behaviour. In Linux, there
>>> are
>>> bash commands that can only be run by using
On Thursday 07 May 2015 12:19, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
>> There's nothing Windows-specific about that behaviour. In Linux, there
>> are
>> bash commands that can only be run by using shell=True. Fortunately
>> Popen didn't make the mistake of p
On Wed, 06 May 2015 09:12:05 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
> Remember the days when you knew how many cycles each assembly
> instruction took, and could simply add them up to compare algorithms?
I do! I do! :-)
And then the MC68020 came out, and instruction execution overlapped in
weird (but predic
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> There's nothing Windows-specific about that behaviour. In Linux, there are
> bash commands that can only be run by using shell=True. Fortunately Popen
> didn't make the mistake of pretending it's a shell.
But bash commands aren't the same as
On 2015-05-06 20:22, Tim Chase wrote:
> As ChrisA posted earlier, you have to use Excel's Import
> functionality (there are several ways to get this wizard, but not
> all ways of opening a .csv trigger the wizard), then specify those
> particular columns as "Text" rather than "General"
Sorry, it w
On 2015-05-06, Denis McMahon wrote:
> You need to format your CSV date into a date format that Excel
> understands when it imports it.
>
> First thing to try would be to export some dates from excel as CSV and
> see what format excel puts them in.
Beware of assuming that Excel can import its ow
On 2015-05-06 23:31, Denis McMahon wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2015 22:32:28 -0700, Kashif Rana wrote:
> > thanks for the feedback. I think its problem with excel itself,
> > showing wrong value. Because when I opened the csv file in text
> > editor, I can see correct value but opening in excel showing
On 05/06/2015 06:11 PM, Stefan Zimmermann wrote:
Hi.
I don't like that subprocess.Popen(['command']) only works on Windows if there
is a command.exe in %PATH%.
As a Windows user you would normally expect that also command.bat and
command.cmd can be run that way.
and command.com.
If it'
On Tue, 05 May 2015 22:32:28 -0700, Kashif Rana wrote:
> thanks for the feedback. I think its problem with excel itself, showing
> wrong value. Because when I opened the csv file in text editor, I can
> see correct value but opening in excel showing wrong value. What I can
> do to see correct in e
Just to follow up on this thread, for interested readers' future reference...
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Rob Clewley wrote:
>> In fact, I'm trying to build a general purpose tool for exploring the
>> inner workings of numerical algorith
On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:59:03 -0700, worship.brother wrote:
> Archaeologists have found a scroll with the following texts:
First you need to visit the hidden Temple of Offler, where you will find
the Tears of Offler (they're the big gems set into the statue just above
the teeth) after making you
Hi.
I don't like that subprocess.Popen(['command']) only works on Windows if there
is a command.exe in %PATH%. As a Windows user you would normally expect that
also command.bat and command.cmd can be run that way.
There are simple workarounds like Popen(..., shell=True) but that is a heavy
ove
On 5/6/2015 12:23 AM, Palpandi wrote:
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:07:13 PM UTC+5:30, Palpandi wrote:
Hi,
What are the ways to encrypt python files?
No, I just want to hide the scripts from others.
See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/261638/how-do-i-protect-python-code
Emile
--
htt
On 06/05/2015 21:27, noydb wrote:
I have a zip file containing several files and I want to extract out just the
.xml file. I have that code. Curious if this xml file can be extracted into
memory. If so, how to? I only need to move the file around, and maybe read
some tags.
Thanks for any
On 05/06/2015 04:27 PM, noydb wrote:
I have a zip file containing several files and I want to extract out just the
.xml file. I have that code. Curious if this xml file can be extracted into
memory. If so, how to? I only need to move the file around, and maybe read
some tags.
Thanks for a
I have a zip file containing several files and I want to extract out just the
.xml file. I have that code. Curious if this xml file can be extracted into
memory. If so, how to? I only need to move the file around, and maybe read
some tags.
Thanks for any help!
python 2.7
--
https://mail.p
On 06/05/2015 17:17, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano
Besides, "typical load" is a myth -- there is no such thing. A high-end
Windows web server getting ten thousand hits a minute, a virtual machine
starved for RAM, a Mac laptop, a Linux server idling away with a
On 05/06/2015 11:36 AM, Alain Ketterlin wrote:
Yes, plus the time for memory allocation. Since the code uses "r *=
...", space is reallocated when the result doesn't fit. The new size is
probably proportional to the current (insufficient) size. This means
that overall, you'll need fewer reallocat
On 06/05/2015 17:03, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2015 10:40 pm, BartC wrote:
But I had in mind not implementing ++ and --, but detecting them and
issuing a warning,
That's a job for a linter, not the compiler. The compiler should be as
flexible as possible in what it accepts:
a ,
On 2015-05-06 12:27, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Tim Chase
> wrote:
> > On 2015-05-06 19:08, MRAB wrote:
> >> You could tell it to quote any value that's not a number:
> >>
> >> w = csv.DictWriter(f, pol_keys,
> >> quoting=csv.QUOTE_NONNUMERIC)
> >>
> >> It looks like
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Tim Chase
wrote:
> On 2015-05-06 19:08, MRAB wrote:
>> You could tell it to quote any value that's not a number:
>>
>> w = csv.DictWriter(f, pol_keys,
>> quoting=csv.QUOTE_NONNUMERIC)
>>
>> It looks like all of the values you have are strings, so they'll
>> a
On 2015-05-06 19:08, MRAB wrote:
> You could tell it to quote any value that's not a number:
>
> w = csv.DictWriter(f, pol_keys,
> quoting=csv.QUOTE_NONNUMERIC)
>
> It looks like all of the values you have are strings, so they'll
> all be quoted.
>
> I would hope that Excel will then treat
On 2015-05-06 06:32, Kashif Rana wrote:
Hello guys
thanks for the feedback. I think its problem with excel itself, showing wrong
value. Because when I opened the csv file in text editor, I can see correct
value but opening in excel showing wrong value. What I can do to see correct in
excel as
Ian Kelly writes:
> That was my initial thought as well, but the problem is that this
> actually predicts the *opposite* of what is being reported: upward
> should be less expensive, not more.
Wait, what? Hmm, you're right. Needed coffee, will think about it more
later.
--
https://mail.python.
In pra devOPS
writes:
> I wanted to compare two json files ignoring few of the keys in the json
> files.
> Can anybody suggest me few things?
Load each json file into a python object, delete the keys you don't care
about, and compare the two objects.
--
John Gordon Imagine what it m
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 May 2015 15:58, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>> Only the minimum is statistically useful.
>>
>> I disagree. The minimum tells you how fast the code *can* run, under
>> opti
On Wed, 6 May 2015 10:40 pm, BartC wrote:
> But I had in mind not implementing ++ and --, but detecting them and
> issuing a warning,
That's a job for a linter, not the compiler. The compiler should be as
flexible as possible in what it accepts:
a ,b=12+3 * 4,"hello"
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>> Multiplying upwards seems to be more expensive than multiplying
>> downwards... I can only guess that it has something to do with the way
>> multiplication is implemented, or perhaps the memory management
>> involved,
Paul Rubin writes:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>> Multiplying upwards seems to be more expensive than multiplying
>> downwards... I can only guess that it has something to do with the way
>> multiplication is implemented, or perhaps the memory management
>> involved, or something. Who the hell kno
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> Multiplying upwards seems to be more expensive than multiplying
> downwards... I can only guess that it has something to do with the way
> multiplication is implemented, or perhaps the memory management
> involved, or something. Who the hell knows?
It seems pretty natura
On 05/06/2015 09:55 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
I had guessed that the order of multiplication would make a big difference,
once the product started getting bigger than the machine word size.
Reason I thought that is that if you multiply startin
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
> I had guessed that the order of multiplication would make a big difference,
> once the product started getting bigger than the machine word size.
>
> Reason I thought that is that if you multiply starting at the top value (and
> end with multipl
On 05/06/2015 02:26 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wednesday 06 May 2015 14:05, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
My interpretation of this is that the difference has something to do with
the cost of multiplications. Multiplying upwards seems to be more expensive
than multiplying downwards, a result I nev
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:11 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015, at 18:02, BartC wrote:
>> (I think I would have picked up "++" and "--" as special tokens even if
>> increment/decrement ops weren't supported. Just because they would
>> likely cause errors through misunderstanding.)
>
> There's prec
On Mon, May 4, 2015, at 18:02, BartC wrote:
> (I think I would have picked up "++" and "--" as special tokens even if
> increment/decrement ops weren't supported. Just because they would
> likely cause errors through misunderstanding.)
There's precedent for not doing this in C itself - even thou
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 6:09:08 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 05-05-15 om 18:24 schreef Rustom Mody:
>
> > Yeah I happen to me in that minuscule minority that regards '= denotes
> > assignment' a bigger mistake than ++
>
> Nice to know I'm not alone. I Especially think it is a mist
On 06/05/2015 12:19, Gregory Ewing wrote:
BartC wrote:
So why pretend that ++ and -- don't exist?
Probably because Python would gain very little from
having them.
Main uses of ++ in C are things like integer for
loops:
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {...
and stepping through arrays:
a[i
Op 05-05-15 om 18:24 schreef Rustom Mody:
> Yeah I happen to me in that minuscule minority that regards '= denotes
> assignment' a bigger mistake than ++
Nice to know I'm not alone. I Especially think it is a mistake, because
it is then used as a reason for not allowing something like
if a =
On 05/05/2015 20:55, pra devOPS wrote:
Hi All:
I wanted to compare two json files ignoring few of the keys in the json
files.
Can anybody suggest me few things?
Thanks,
Siva
https://docs.python.org/3/library/json.html#module-json
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do
On Wed, 6 May 2015 07:45 pm, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
> I used the marshal module before as a faster alternative to shelve (I
> marshalled a huge dictionary). I always understood marshal files require
> the *exact* same interpreter version (incl. built number). Do the same
> limitations apply for
BartC wrote:
So why pretend that ++ and -- don't exist?
Probably because Python would gain very little from
having them.
Main uses of ++ in C are things like integer for
loops:
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {...
and stepping through arrays:
a[i++] = b[j++];
Python code usually operates a
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The first one just does a name lookup and then throws the result away. The
second one looks up names a and b, then adds them together, throwing away
the result.
Actually, it's worse than that. :-) It's possible for a to
have an __add__ method with a side effect, althoug
-
On Wed, May 6, 2015 11:04 AM CEST Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>On Wednesday 06 May 2015 17:23, Palpandi wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:07:13 PM UTC+5:30, Palpandi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What are the ways to encrypt python files?
>>
>> No, I just want to hide t
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list
wrote:
>>The only feasible solution is to distribute files only to those
>>recipients you want to have them, and can trust to do with them as you
>>ask. If you don't trust a recipient, don't hand the files to them.
>
> Can tools lik
On Wednesday 06 May 2015 17:23, Palpandi wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:07:13 PM UTC+5:30, Palpandi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What are the ways to encrypt python files?
>
> No, I just want to hide the scripts from others.
Why, are you ashamed of your code?
Python is free, open source softw
Hi All:
I wanted to compare two json files ignoring few of the keys in the json
files.
Can anybody suggest me few things?
Thanks,
Siva
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-
On Wed, May 6, 2015 9:41 AM CEST Ben Finney wrote:
>Palpandi writes:
>
>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:07:13 PM UTC+5:30, Palpandi wrote:
>
>> > What are the ways to encrypt python files?
>>
>> No, I just want to hide the scripts from others.
>
>Which others? You
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> The only feasible solution is to distribute files only to those
> recipients you want to have them, and can trust to do with them as you
> ask. If you don't trust a recipient, don't hand the files to them.
in today's world, that basically gives
Palpandi writes:
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:07:13 PM UTC+5:30, Palpandi wrote:
> > What are the ways to encrypt python files?
>
> No, I just want to hide the scripts from others.
Which others? You can hide the scripts from them by never showing those
others the scripts. If you don't trus
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:07:13 PM UTC+5:30, Palpandi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the ways to encrypt python files?
No, I just want to hide the scripts from others.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wednesday 06 May 2015 15:58, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> Only the minimum is statistically useful.
>
> I disagree. The minimum tells you how fast the code *can* run, under
> optimal circumstances. The mean tells you how fast it *realistically
Op Wednesday 6 May 2015 07:32 CEST schreef Kashif Rana:
> thanks for the feedback. I think its problem with excel itself,
> showing wrong value. Because when I opened the csv file in text
> editor, I can see correct value but opening in excel showing wrong
> value. What I can do to see correct in
52 matches
Mail list logo
