On 18/02/2016 05:42, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Today I learned that **kwargs style keyword arguments can be any string:
py> def test(**kw):
... print(kw)
...
py> kwargs = {'abc-def': 42, '': 23, '---': 999, '123': 17}
py> test(**kwargs)
{'': 23, '123': 17, '---': 999, 'abc-def': 42}
Bug or fea
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> There are more features in Python 3, so in that trivial sense of "more to
> learn", I suppose that it is objectively correct that it is harder to learn
> than Python 2. But I don't think the learning curve is any steeper. If
> anything, the
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 01:47, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> There are more features in Python 3, so in that trivial sense of "more to
> learn", I suppose that it is objectively correct that it is harder to
> learn
> than Python 2. But I don't think the learning curve is any steeper. If
> anything,
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> I suppose that it is objectively correct that it is harder to learn
> than Python 2. But I don't think the learning curve is any steeper. If
> anything, the learning curve is ever-so-slightly less steep.
I think py3 has more learning curve because it uses iterators in pl
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> There are more features in Python 3, so in that trivial sense of "more to
> learn", I suppose that it is objectively correct that it is harder to learn
> than Python 2. But I don't think the learning curve is any steeper.
Set against the “more features in Python 3” is
On Wednesday 17 February 2016 19:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
> I hope someone can help me find this link: There is some record that Guido
> has said that python3 is probably a bit harder on noobs than python2.
>
> Does anyone know/have that link?
I can't say that I've seen it. I know that Raymond He
On 2/18/2016 12:59 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Steven D'Aprano writes:
Today I learned that **kwargs style keyword arguments can be any string:
py> def test(**kw):
... print(kw)
...
py> kwargs = {'abc-def': 42, '': 23, '---': 999, '123': 17}
py> test(**kwargs)
{'': 23, '123': 17, '---': 999, '
Paul Rubin :
> Marko Rauhamaa writes:
>> @asyncio.coroutine
>> def background_task(): ...
>> while time.time() - t < 10:
>> pass
>
> Wait, that's a cpu-busy loop, you can't do that in cooperative
> multitasking. Of course you need a wait there.
That was the very point: to demonstrat
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> Today I learned that **kwargs style keyword arguments can be any string:
>
>
> py> def test(**kw):
> ... print(kw)
> ...
> py> kwargs = {'abc-def': 42, '': 23, '---': 999, '123': 17}
> py> test(**kwargs)
> {'': 23, '123': 17, '---': 999, 'abc-def': 42}
>
>
> Bug or
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> Today I learned that **kwargs style keyword arguments can be any string:
>
>
> py> def test(**kw):
> ... print(kw)
> ...
> py> kwargs = {'abc-def': 42, '': 23, '---': 999, '123': 17}
> py> test(**kwargs)
> {'': 23, '123': 17, '---': 999
Today I learned that **kwargs style keyword arguments can be any string:
py> def test(**kw):
... print(kw)
...
py> kwargs = {'abc-def': 42, '': 23, '---': 999, '123': 17}
py> test(**kwargs)
{'': 23, '123': 17, '---': 999, 'abc-def': 42}
Bug or feature?
--
Steve
--
https://mail.python
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> @asyncio.coroutine
> def background_task(): ...
> while time.time() - t < 10:
> pass
Wait, that's a cpu-busy loop, you can't do that in cooperative
multitasking. Of course you need a wait there.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2016-02-17 16:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> If you want the file to be closed immediately, you must:
>
> - use a with statement;
>
> - or explicitly call f.close()
I have a lot of pre-"with" code (i.e., Py2.4) that looks like
f = open(...)
try:
do_stuff()
finally:
f.close()
To
On 18Feb2016 02:05, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 18/02/2016 01:29, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
The "for ... open ..." is definitely not a good design pattern. It opens a file at
"for" block but leaves it closed somewhere in the sky.
Hardly, as all ready explained, but how about this
handle = ope
On 18/02/2016 01:29, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
The "for ... open ..." is definitely not a good design pattern. It opens a file at
"for" block but leaves it closed somewhere in the sky.
Hardly, as all ready explained, but how about this
handle = open('foo.txt')
for line in handle :
...do
The "for ... open ..." is definitely not a good design pattern. It opens a file
at "for" block but leaves it closed somewhere in the sky.
> The garbage collector will:
> - reclaim the memory used by the object;
> - close the file.
I suppose (IMO) that the primitive idea of garbage collection do
eryk sun wrote:
> >> The AutoRun command (it's a command line, not a script path)
> >
> > A script path is a legal command line, too.
>
> If the registry value were just a script path, you'd have to modify
> your script to chain to the previous script, if any. Since it's a
> command line you can
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 2:49 PM, wrong.addres...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I am mostly getting positive feedback for Python.
>
I would be surprised if you weren’t.
> It seems Python is used more for web based applications. Is it equally fine
> for creating stand-alone *.exe's? Can the same code be c
Seeing there is a lot of interest in asyncio recently I figured people
might be interested in this
http://www.snarky.ca/how-the-heck-does-async-await-work-in-python-3-5
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
h
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM, wrote:
> Could someone kindly tell me advantages and disadvantages of Python? Or any
> better options? I have like 40-50 VB Forms and may be around 2 lines of
> code. It will be a task to learn a new language and translate/re-write that
> code.
Why are yo
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Ulli Horlacher
wrote:
> eryk sun wrote:
>> >
>> > set PATH=%PATH%;%USERPROFILE%\Desktop
>>
>> The AutoRun command (it's a command line, not a script path)
>
> A script path is a legal command line, too.
If the registry value were just a script path, you'd have to
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Rob Gaddi <
rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> wrote:
> > It seems Python is used more for web based applications. Is it equally
> fine for creating stand-alone *.exe's? Can the same code be compiled to run
> on Linux or Android or web-based?
>
> Standalone EXEs ar
Sushanth wrote:
> i need to convert r data frame to pandas dataframe and vise versa
>
Now, now, let's at least _try_ to help.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=convert+r+data+frame+to+pandas
--
Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology -- www.highlandtechnology.com
Email address domain is currently out of order. S
wrong.addres...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am mostly getting positive feedback for Python.
Welcome to the party. Learn to write Python 3. There is no reason
whatsoever for someone picking up Python to learn the deprecated
problems of Python 2.
> It seems Python is used more for web based application
rr eat your heart out.
https://hynek.me/articles/python3-2016/
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 17/02/2016 18:00, Sushanth wrote:
i need to convert r data frame to pandas dataframe and vise versa
It is very easy, just write some code. When you have finished, please
show us your results.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for o
eryk sun wrote:
> > At startup cmd.exe runs a script which is defined by the registry variable
> > AutoRun in "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Command Processor"
> >
> > I set this variable with:
> >
> > rc = "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Command Processor"
> > ar = "%USERPROFILE%\Desktop\autorun.cmd"
> >
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 11:49:44 AM UTC-8, wrong.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I am mostly getting positive feedback for Python.
Good!
>
> It seems Python is used more for web based applications. Is it equally fine
> for creating stand-alone *.exe's? Can the same code be compiled to run o
I am mostly getting positive feedback for Python.
It seems Python is used more for web based applications. Is it equally fine for
creating stand-alone *.exe's? Can the same code be compiled to run on Linux or
Android or web-based?
Is it possible to create GUI elements with a good IDE? Can they
Greetings;
I am having difficulty with the resultant gui objects its making that are
too tall. They fit in the except the resultant box is 40
to 50 pixels too tall, wasting valueable screen real estate, and I
haven't found a way to give the a "40" command
that seems to be acceptable.
I kno
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Ulli Horlacher
wrote:
> At startup cmd.exe runs a script which is defined by the registry variable
> AutoRun in "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Command Processor"
>
> I set this variable with:
>
> rc = "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Command Processor"
> ar = "%USERPROFILE%
On 17/02/16 18:00, Sushanth wrote:
i need to convert r data frame to pandas dataframe and vise versa
Wow! How do you plan to do that?
--
Tony van der Hoff| mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org
Buckinghamshire, England |
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i need to convert r data frame to pandas dataframe and vise versa
--
*Regards*
*Sushanth*
*ph : 91-9444583307*
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Full blog post:
http://grodola.blogspot.com/2016/02/psutil-4-real-process-memory-and-environ.html
--
Giampaolo - http://grodola.blogspot.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> By the way: there is a script called `win_add2path.py` in your Python
> distribution
I have
"Python 2.7.11 (v2.7.11:6d1b6a68f775, Dec 5 2015, 20:32:19) [MSC
v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32"
and there is no "win_add2path.py"
But I found another solution:
I need the ex
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> What is the pattern for chaining execution of tasks with ThreadPoolExecutor?
> Callbacks is not an adequate facility as each task I have will generate new
> output.
Can you specify in more detail what your use case is?
If you don't mind
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Iam on python 2.6 and Linux , I had replaced print out, err ret with
> logging.info(out, err ,ret) in the below code . I am getting
>
> "TypeError: not all arguments converted during string formatting"
> error any quick suggestion
>
The
I think logging.info(out) works the problem is when I add
logging.info(out,err,ret) ,may be there is a better way to supply this
arguments
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
> Iam on python 2.6 and Linux , I had replaced print out, err ret with
> logging.info(o
Hi Team,
Iam on python 2.6 and Linux , I had replaced print out, err ret with
logging.info(out, err ,ret) in the below code . I am getting
"TypeError: not all arguments converted during string formatting"
error any quick suggestion
try:
out, err, ret = run(cmd, timeout=60)
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Jeremy Leonard wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 3:02:40 PM UTC-5, Φώντας Λαδοπρακόπουλος
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I recentely changed VPS server and when i try to load my webiste iam
>> receiving 500 error which i wasnt receiving in my old VPS server wi
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 3:02:40 PM UTC-5, Φώντας Λαδοπρακόπουλος wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recentely changed VPS server and when i try to load my webiste iam
> receiving 500 error which i wasnt receiving in my old VPS server with the
> same exact cgi scripts.
>
> After looking at Apacher's
On 16 February 2016 at 19:40, Ben Finney wrote:
> Oscar Benjamin writes:
>
>> If you're going to patch open to return a fake file when asked to open
>> fake_file_path why do you care whether there is a real file of that
>> name?
>
> I don't, and have been saying explicitly many times in this thre
I met @ntoll at an event in India. It was refreshing to see his passion for
teaching kids about programming and python. I would have loved to be there,
but I don't reside in the UK. Nevertheless, just replying to wish you guys
all the best.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Tim Golden wrote:
>
[Forwarding an email from python-uk in the hope that UK-based
Pythonistas might see it here who don't hang out there...]
From: Nicholas H.Tollervey
Reply-To: UK Python Users
To: UK Python Users
Hi Folks,
I realise I must sound like a stuck record about this sort of thing -
please accept my si
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 10:54:43 AM UTC+5:30, John Ladasky wrote:
> On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 6:02:24 PM UTC-8, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > I don't need Python3. And i reckon that by the time i do,
> > something more interesting will come along, or, i'll create
> > something more inter
45 matches
Mail list logo
