On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:19 PM, wrote:
> Thanks Chris for replying, but it didn't work. The upgrade happened, but
> still python can't see numpy! So it seems to be a path problem. The numpy
> (and scipy and matplotlib) files are there, so surely in principle it's a
> simple matter of pointing
Thanks Chris for replying, but it didn't work. The upgrade happened, but still
python can't see numpy! So it seems to be a path problem. The numpy (and scipy
and matplotlib) files are there, so surely in principle it's a simple matter of
pointing my python path at them?
Any ideas how?
(I shoul
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:08 PM, wrote:
> I use Python on Ubuntu 12.04. Recently I upgraded Python from 2.7.3 to
> 2.7.12. I did the upgrade via the source, i.e. download (from
> https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-2712/ ), tar, ./config, sudo
> make install.
>
> After the upgrade,
Hi all. I hope this is the right place. It seems more like a Python problem
than an Ubuntu problem.
I use Python on Ubuntu 12.04. Recently I upgraded Python from 2.7.3 to 2.7.12.
I did the upgrade via the source, i.e. download (from
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-2712/ ), tar,
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 03:21 am, BartC wrote:
> On 18/12/2016 10:59, Paul Götze wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> there is a nice short article by E. W. Dijkstra about why it makes sense
>> to start numbering at zero (and exclude the upper given bound) while
>> slicing a list. Might give a bit of additional u
I first explored the possibility of a lookup table to speed up calculations,
this possibility would probably give wrong results.
I am interested in calculating all possibilities to see which one is truely
best, I am also interested in trying to speed up calculations to be able to
handle larger
Random832 wrote:
Except for the fact that the actual keyboard that Emacs was originally
developed for [the Knight Keyboard, and the later Symbolics "Space
Cadet" Keyboards] had the control key more or less where it is on modern
PC keyboards [slightly further to the right, so easier to reach with
BartC wrote:
But if you needed a table of the frequencies of letters A to Z...
An N-based array can simply have bounds of ord('A') to ord('Z')
inclusive.
That's fine if your language lets you have arrays with
arbitrary lower bounds.
But if the language only allows a fixed lower bound, and
fur
Jussi Piitulainen writes:
> Ben Bacarisse writes:
>
>> BartC writes:
>>
>>> You need to take your C hat off, I think.
>>
>> It's a computing hat. Indexes are best seen as offsets (i.e. as a
>> measured distances from some origin or base). It's a model that grew
>> out of machine addressing and
This problem has been solved. Thanks to all of you for your suggestions.
Below is a summary I sent to Tim Golden, whose reply led us to the solution
in this case.
Tim,
Thank you for your help - your suggestions led us to the problem. Turns
out that another instance of Python *was* installed,
hello im Android user and i was learning python programming language from a
month ago with qpython
and i have a question is it possible to run this github scripts on qpython?
https://github.com/rmmh/skybot
thnx.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 19/12/2016 13:48, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
BartC writes:
You need to take your C hat off, I think.
It's a computing hat. Indexes are best seen as offsets (i.e. as a
measured distances from some origin or base).
A 1-based or N-based index can still be seen as an offset from element
0, if
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 at 13:20 wrote:
> thanks! very clarifying. One more question though: after installing
> python3.5 I only have pip3 and pip3.5 from the command line. However, I
> issued the command
>
> python3.5 -m pip install matplotlib
>
> and it all went like a charm. At the end of the inst
Hmmm now I think the lookup table cannot work... at least not for the dynamic
one... where health is subtracted...
The ships have a certain health... and not just an alive/dead status...
The way they and the enemy attack each other will probably influence the
outcome of battle... and for the ne
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Erik wrote:
>> 1) Method call:
>>"obj.foo(1, 2, 3)" is syntactic sugar for "obj.foo(obj, 1, 2, 3)".
>
> And the bit you have to be REALLY careful of when working with both
> Python and JS is that you have to have "obj.foo(...)" as a si
Ben Bacarisse writes:
> BartC writes:
>
>> You need to take your C hat off, I think.
>
> It's a computing hat. Indexes are best seen as offsets (i.e. as a
> measured distances from some origin or base). It's a model that grew
> out of machine addressing and assembler address modes many, many
> d
Hmmm I see that I have made an old mistake of mine ;)
2x2x2x2 is not 8, it's deceptive... it looks like 4x2 = 8 but nope ! :)
This is 2x2=4x2=8x2=16.
and then the next 4 = 16x2 = 32x2 = 64x2 = 128 x 2=256
so it's roughly 24^4 x 256 = 84934656
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
BartC writes:
> On 19/12/2016 01:10, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> BartC writes:
>>
>>> On 18/12/2016 10:59, Paul Götze wrote:
there is a nice short article by E. W. Dijkstra about why it makes sense
to start numbering at zero (and exclude the upper given bound) while
slicing a list. Mi
> In theory, "pip3" will install into the default "python3", whichever
> that is. However, in practice, it's entirely possible that it installs
> into a very different Python from the one you're expecting. The most
> reliable form is the latter; whatever command you use to start Python,
> add "-m p
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016, at 17:03, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> mm0fmf wrote:
> > +1 for knowing where CTRL should be.
> > Bonus +1 for having used an ASR33.
>
> And it's quite remarkable that the designers of the ASR33
> knew exactly where it would need to be for Emacs users
> years later! I think Richard
On Sunday, December 18, 2016 at 11:21:38 AM UTC-5, BartC wrote:
> On 18/12/2016 10:59, Paul Götze wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > there is a nice short article by E. W. Dijkstra about why it makes sense
> > to start numbering at zero (and exclude the upper given bound) while
> > slicing a list. Might g
On 19/12/2016 01:10, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
BartC writes:
On 18/12/2016 10:59, Paul Götze wrote:
there is a nice short article by E. W. Dijkstra about why it makes sense
to start numbering at zero (and exclude the upper given bound) while
slicing a list. Might give a bit of additional understan
Skybuck wrote:
"
Also keep in mind that an attack is only valid if the target is still alive,
otherwise the attacker would move to the next one.
So pre-computing an attack plan/outcome or storing it might not be so usefull
for on color, since the other color might already be dead and thus atta
Peter Otten wrote:
> Here's a simple implementation that assumes both input and output file
... are in TAB-delimited text format.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
metal.su...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi, I'm learning python and full of extensive tutorials around. Getting a
> bit lost and overflowed in my head with tuples, dictionaries, lists, etc
> ... etc... Everything great, but I'd like to perform some basic task while
> learning the rest. For example, I'm hav
25 matches
Mail list logo
