[issue40562] SEO: differentiate between Python 2 and Python 3 docs on Google SERP

GR3 WEB - CRIAÇÃO DE SITE added the comment: This problem on my website too. https://gr3web.com.br it seems that there is an SEO bug against the Python documentation - Google is truncating part of the title that informs if the documents are for Python 2 or Python 3 -- nosy: +gr3web

[issue1635741] Py_Finalize() doesn't clear all Python objects at exit

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset 426f2b4f13f392875e7861dbd7f34735731eff17 by Mohamed Koubaa in branch 'master': bpo-1635741: Port _opcode module to multi-phase init (PEP 489) (GH-22050) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/426f2b4f13f392875e7861dbd7f34735731eff17

[issue35520] Python won't build with dtrace enabled on some systems.

Jakub Kulik added the comment: No more non-security related backports to 3.7 allowed. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

Re: Replacement for pygtk?

Akkana Peck writes: > Grant Edwards writes: >> * PyQt -- I run Gtk-centric Linux systems, and the second you try to >>use one Qt widget, it always seems to pull in hundreds of packages >>that take a week to build. > > I haven't generally found that about PyQt. Most KDE apps do pull in >

[issue41687] sendfile implementation is not compatible with Solaris

Jakub Kulik added the comment: I just realized that the recently merged PR has broken error handling, so I opened another one with a followup fix. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue1635741] Py_Finalize() doesn't clear all Python objects at exit

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset 1aaa21ff818b08af2a68862b552b7ba0857492eb by Mohamed Koubaa in branch 'master': bpo-1635741 port zlib module to multi-phase init (GH-21995) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/1aaa21ff818b08af2a68862b552b7ba0857492eb --

[issue41687] sendfile implementation is not compatible with Solaris

Change by Jakub Kulik : -- pull_requests: +21209 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22128 ___ Python tracker ___

Re: What this error want to say? Can't we use return without function?

On Monday, 7 September 2020 at 13:10:57 UTC+5:30, Shivlal Sharma wrote: > On Monday, 7 September 2020 at 13:08:04 UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:36 PM Shivlal Sharma wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, 7 September 2020 at 12:57:16 UTC+5:30, Python wrote: > > > >

Re: What this error want to say? Can't we use return without function?

On Monday, 7 September 2020 at 13:08:04 UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:36 PM Shivlal Sharma wrote: > > > > On Monday, 7 September 2020 at 12:57:16 UTC+5:30, Python wrote: > > > Shivlal Sharma wrote: > > > > N = int(input("enter a positive integer:")) > > > > coun

[issue33802] Regression in logging configuration

Change by Jakub Kulik : -- nosy: -kulikjak ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

Re: What this error want to say? Can't we use return without function?

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:36 PM Shivlal Sharma wrote: > > On Monday, 7 September 2020 at 12:57:16 UTC+5:30, Python wrote: > > Shivlal Sharma wrote: > > > N = int(input("enter a positive integer:")) > > > coun = 1 > > > while (N > 0): > > > coun = coun * N > > > N = N - 1 > > > return coun > > >

[issue36533] logging regression with threading + fork are mixed in 3.7.1rc2 (deadlock potential)

Change by Jakub Kulik : -- nosy: -kulikjak ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33802] Regression in logging configuration

Change by Jakub Kulik : -- pull_requests: -21199 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue36533] logging regression with threading + fork are mixed in 3.7.1rc2 (deadlock potential)

Change by Jakub Kulik : -- pull_requests: -21198 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue6721] Locks in the standard library should be sanitized on fork

Change by Jakub Kulik : -- pull_requests: -21197 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

Re: What this error want to say? Can't we use return without function?

On Monday, 7 September 2020 at 12:57:16 UTC+5:30, Python wrote: > Shivlal Sharma wrote: > > N = int(input("enter a positive integer:")) > > coun = 1 > > while (N > 0): > > coun = coun * N > > N = N - 1 > > return coun > > nice = ntime(N) > > print(nice) > > > > > > error: return outside

[issue6721] Locks in the standard library should be sanitized on fork

Change by Jakub Kulik : -- nosy: -kulikjak ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

tinker Form question(s)

I am not sure how to post the code for my file here, is copy/paste the best way? Is there another? I understand that attachments are stripped off. """ The following segment of code returns values of "spec". I would like to have it return the associated value of "DataLine" with each spec. It would

<    1   2