On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:37 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 4:20 PM wrote:
> > By the way, some months ago I started trying to migrate to Python 3 and
> > gave up in favor of creating said compilation. Compatibility of Python
> > and its Packages decreased with V3 significan
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 4:20 PM wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> you seem to imply, that I have compiled said versions without reason and
> that the same would be possible on basis of Python 3 - which is simply
> not true. Maybe you are not enough acquainted with Qt and belonging
> libraries alike PyQtGraph.
Chris,
you seem to imply, that I have compiled said versions without reason and
that the same would be possible on basis of Python 3 - which is simply
not true. Maybe you are not enough acquainted with Qt and belonging
libraries alike PyQtGraph. Maybe you are just not willing to see /
accept
On 2021-03-27 03:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 2:15 PM wrote:
[snip]
By the way, there is more, Blythooon offers beyond what I already have
written in the last email. Otherwise please name me another comparable
MINIMAL 'distribution', which is compiled specifically for sc
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 2:15 PM wrote:
>
> No, I am not encouraging, I am just offering the possibility.
>
> Python and its community once was not dogmatic. At least this was my
> impression when I started - after all Python originally had been
> designed to be multi paradigmatic. This spirit of f
No, I am not encouraging, I am just offering the possibility.
Python and its community once was not dogmatic. At least this was my
impression when I started - after all Python originally had been
designed to be multi paradigmatic. This spirit of freedom was one mayor
reason for Python to grow
https://docs.python.org/3/library/fileinput.html
Dan,
Yes, fileinput sounds like what I described and more. It does indeed seem
to emulate the interface in programs like AWK including using "-" as a
placeholder for standard input. Now all you need is to have it also do the
split!
∀vi ∃.
On 2021-03-26 at 21:06:19 -0400,
Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
> A generator that opens one file at a time (or STDIN) in a consistent
> manner, would be a reasonable thing to have as part of emulating AWK.
https://docs.python.org/3/library/fileinput.html
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Michael,
A generator that opens one file at a time (or STDIN) in a consistent manner,
would be a reasonable thing to have as part of emulating AWK.
As I see it, you may want a bit more that includes having it know how to
parse each line it reads into some version of names that in Python might not
On 3/25/21 1:14 AM, Loris Bennett wrote:
> Does any one have a better approach?
Not as such. Running a command and parsing its output is a relatively
common task. Years ago I wrote my own simple python wrapper function
that would make it easier to run a program with arguments, and capture
its out
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 7:49 AM wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>
> thank you for your interest and thanks for asking.
>
>
> Blythooon is notable due to several reasons; let's compare it with some
> of the already listed (and thus obviously notable) 'distributions':
>
> 2) winpython seems not to support Py
Sorry, copy & paste obviously failed, here is the link I wanted to
include:
https://www.anaconda.com/terms-of-service
On 2021-03-26 17:33, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:31 AM wrote:
Howdy Folks,
I would like to suggest adding "Blythooon" to the list under "Other
partie
Hi Chris,
thank you for your interest and thanks for asking.
Blythooon is notable due to several reasons; let's compare it with some
of the already listed (and thus obviously notable) 'distributions':
1) pythonxy seems not to be maintained anymore - the last version I
found is from 2015.
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:36 AM Anis4Games wrote:
> Hello python support team , i need help about packages and python modules
>
> That Video Will Explain My Problem
>
Please don't send any attachment to the list - it will be dropped from the
E-mail.
Cut'n'paste any errors you receive dire
Christian Gollwitzer writes:
> The closest equivalent I can come up with in Python is this:
>
> ==
> import sys
>
> s=0
> for line in sys.stdin:
> try:
> s += float(line.split()[1])
> except:
> pass
> print(s)
> =
Hello python support team , i need help about packages and python modules
That Video Will Explain My Problem
The Problem : Is Im Installed [Socks] Alredy With Command => pip install
socks
But When i run some script using socks pack its show a error with message "
import socks " no socks modules
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:31 AM wrote:
>
> Howdy Folks,
>
>
> I would like to suggest adding "Blythooon" to the list under "Other
> parties have re-packaged CPython" listed here:
>
What makes it notable?
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Howdy Folks,
I would like to suggest adding "Blythooon" to the list under "Other
parties have re-packaged CPython" listed here:
https://www.python.org/download/alternatives/
Blythooon can be found here:
https://pypi.org/project/blythooon/
and the belonging installation step-by-step-guid
18 matches
Mail list logo
