On 13/08/2021 06:49, Ridit wrote:
So, whoever gets this, when I try to download packages using pip, it shows
errors saying "'pip' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file." Is there a way to solve this? I tried
modifying, even repairing
So, whoever gets this, when I try to download packages using pip, it shows
errors saying "'pip' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file." Is there a way to solve this? I tried
modifying, even repairing three times, but still it doesn't work.
On 13/08/21 5:52 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
I think what he's talking about is allowing the user to attach
arbitrary _metadata_ to the file ... IOW, something similar to the > "resource
fork" that MacOS used to have.
The resource fork was used for more than just metadata, it was
often the entire
On 13/08/21 11:42 am, Cameron Simpson wrote:
2: It took me a while to see, but this is a type annotiation.
Interestingly, it seems to be parsed as a form of assignment with
a missing RHS.
>>> from ast import parse, dump
>>> dump(parse("if0: print('yes!')"))
"Module(body=[AnnAssign(target=Name(
On 12Aug2021 12:09, Hope Rouselle wrote:
>Chris Angelico writes:
>> [...] Plus, it had this fancy
>> concept of "extended attributes"; on older systems (like MS-DOS's
>> "FAT" family), a file might be Read-Only, Hidden, a System file, or
>> needing to be Archived, and that was it - but on HPFS, y
On 11Aug2021 09:11, Hope Rouselle wrote:
>Greg Ewing writes:
>> That may not be doing what you think it's doing. Consider also
>>
> if0: print('yes!')
>> yes!
>
>So, yes, that's puzzling.
>
0 == False
>True
if0: print("yes")
>yes
if(0): print("yes")
>
>
>What's going on th
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 04:41:42 +1000, Chris Angelico
declaimed the following:
>Yeah. It was a strange choice by today's standards, but back then,
>most of my GUI programs were written in REXX.
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VX-REXX
>http://www.edm2.com/0206/vrexx.html
>
There was a librar
On 2021-08-12, MRAB wrote:
>
>> Windows never had filesystems that supported metadata like OS/2 and
>> MacOS did. The registry was an ugly hack that attempted (very poorly)
>> to make up for that lack of metadata.
>>
> FYI, NTFS does support Alternate Data Streams.
That is interesting -- and it
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:09:58 -0300, Hope Rouselle
declaimed the following:
>How is it possible that Microsoft would take part of the code of OS/2?
>Did IBM just hand it to them?
>
Because IBM subcontracted (IE: "paid") M$ to create an OS with XYZ
features for their latest PC (under supe
On 2021-08-12 18:52, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2021-08-12, Hope Rouselle wrote:
OS/2 had all kinds of amazing features (for its time). [...] Plus,
it had this fancy concept of "extended attributes"; on older
systems (like MS-DOS's "FAT" family), a file might be Read-Only,
Hidden, a System file,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 5:03 AM Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-12, Hope Rouselle wrote:
>
> >> OS/2 had all kinds of amazing features (for its time). [...] Plus,
> >> it had this fancy concept of "extended attributes"; on older
> >> systems (like MS-DOS's "FAT" family), a file might be Read-
On 2021-08-12, Hope Rouselle wrote:
>> OS/2 had all kinds of amazing features (for its time). [...] Plus,
>> it had this fancy concept of "extended attributes"; on older
>> systems (like MS-DOS's "FAT" family), a file might be Read-Only,
>> Hidden, a System file, or needing to be Archived, and th
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 2:15 AM Hope Rouselle wrote:
>
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
> > History lesson!
> >
> > Once upon a time, IBM and Microsoft looked at what Intel was
> > producing, and went, hey, we need to design an operating system that
> > can take advantage of the fancy features of this
On 2021-08-12 03:31, Tan Jane wrote:
From: [1]Tan Jane
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 2021 7:48 PM
To: [2]python-list@python.org
Subject: Troubleshoot python app launch
Hi,
I encountered attached screenshot issue while launching the python
application downloaded fo
Chris Angelico writes:
[...]
>> > [1] And boy oh boy was that good fun. The OS/2 Presentation Manager
>> > had a wealth of power available. Good times, sad that's history now.
>>
>> I know OS/2 only by name. I never had the pleasure of using it. In
>> fact, I don't even know how it looks. I m
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:17:32 +1200, dn via Python-list
declaimed the following:
>I've been trying to remember if we had negative-steps in FORTRAN
>do-loops especially once the capability to define subscripting-ranges
>came 'in' (but can't be bothered researching further). If it was
>available, o
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:57:33 +0100, Stephen Tucker
declaimed the following:
>
># Logic Effect
>
>#
>
># [None * 8]TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for *: ...
>
># [(None) * 8] TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for *: ...
>
># [((None)) * 8]TypeError: unsup
From: [1]Tan Jane
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 2021 7:48 PM
To: [2]python-list@python.org
Subject: Troubleshoot python app launch
Hi,
I encountered attached screenshot issue while launching the python
application downloaded for windows.
Please advice on the above.
Thanks for this feedback, Chris, Matthieu. Both are spot on - and thanks
for the timing comparison, Matthieu. I suppose I didn't think to try the
solution you suggest because I didn't think that I would end up with a
single list, but 8 of them.
OK, I'll stop wriggling.
Stephen.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2
You can achieve the same result by writing:
[None] * 8
Comparing both cases in IPython I get:
In [1]: %timeit list((None,)*8)
110 ns ± 0.785 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000 loops each)
In [2]: %timeit [None] * 8
88.2 ns ± 0.432 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 6:59 PM Stephen Tucker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I thought I'd share the following piece of code that I have recently written
> (a) to check that what I have done is reasonable - even optimum,
> (b) to inform others who might be wanting to do similar things, and
> (c) to invite co
Hi,
I thought I'd share the following piece of code that I have recently written
(a) to check that what I have done is reasonable - even optimum,
(b) to inform others who might be wanting to do similar things, and
(c) to invite comment from the community.
-
22 matches
Mail list logo
