> On 26 Dec 2021, at 13:44, Marco Sulla wrote:
>
> Use a semaphore.
>
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 03:30, iMath wrote:
>>
>> Normally, the shelve data should be read and write by only one process at a
>> time, but unfortunately it was simultaneously read and write by two
>> processes, thus co
Greetings lists,
I have started a newspaper (not newsletter) focused
on interesting reads on Python mailing lists. Don't tag
on the fact that holiday seasons are the worst times for
launch according to marketing folks, I started this to note
down interesting mails. This might also be a great way t
> On 25 Dec 2021, at 06:13, Công Huy wrote:
>
> I had uninstalled Python 3.9.7 before but it wasn't uninstalled
> completely. I found it still in my computer and when I click "uninstall",
> it sent me a board "No Python 3.9 installation was detected". Of course,
> it won't be an issue i
> On 26 Dec 2021, at 13:48, Marco Sulla wrote:
>
> I have to use _PyObject_GC_IS_TRACKED(). It can't be used unless you
> define Py_BUILD_CORE. I want to avoid this. What macro or function can
> substitute it?
Why is this needed by your code? Surely the GC does its thing as an
implementation
I have to use _PyObject_GC_IS_TRACKED(). It can't be used unless you
define Py_BUILD_CORE. I want to avoid this. What macro or function can
substitute it?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Use a semaphore.
On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 03:30, iMath wrote:
>
> Normally, the shelve data should be read and write by only one process at a
> time, but unfortunately it was simultaneously read and write by two
> processes, thus corrupted it. Is there any way to recover all data in it ?
> Curre
