On 04/05/2015 18:43, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> Some other gotchas that aren't necessarily related to C/Java but can
> be surprising nonetheless:
>
> *() is a zero-element tuple, and (a, b) is a two-element tuple,
> but (a) is not a one-element tuple. Tuples are created by commas, not
> parentheses
On 22/04/2q014 13:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoon Pardon
> wrote:
>> Yes that was it. I changed the first line of my script to:
>>
>> #!/opt/local/bin/python2.7
>>
>> and it now works.
>
> Excellent! Shebangs are *extremely* specific, so you may want to
> cons
On 22/04/2q014 13:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoon Pardon
> wrote:
>> Yes that was it. I changed the first line of my script to:
>>
>> #!/opt/local/bin/python2.7
>>
>> and it now works.
>
> Excellent! Shebangs are *extremely* specific, so you may want to
> cons
On 22/04/2014 13:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>>> These are the 15 first lines of the script:
>>>
>>> #! /opt/local/bin/python
>>
>> This being Solaris, what happens if you remove the space between the hash-
>> bang and the path? On Linux i
On 03/03/2014 22:19, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 03Mar2014 09:17, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Charles R Harris Wrote in message:
>>>
>>
>> Imo the lesson here is never write in low level c. Use modern
>> languages with well designed exception handling.
>
> What, and rely on someone else's low level
On 13/11/2013 02:45, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
> "math.pi" should be "math.PI". and PI should be a CONSTANT.
> And not just a pseudo constant, but a REAL constant that
> cannot be changed.
>
And what do you do when the wizards bend space-time to make PI exactly
3, for the ease of other calculation
On 07/11/2013 00:24, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
>> On 07/11/2013 00:00, Nathaniel Sokoll-Ward wrote:
>>> Thought this group would appreciate this:
>>> www.metabright.com/challenges/python
>>>
>>> MetaBright mak
On 07/11/2013 00:00, Nathaniel Sokoll-Ward wrote:
> Thought this group would appreciate this: www.metabright.com/challenges/python
>
> MetaBright makes skill assessments to measure how talented people are at
> different skills. And recruiters use MetaBright to find outrageously skilled
> job can
On 21/11/2012 07:01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:35:27 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> And yet, trivial though it may seem, function naming in a permanent API
>> is pretty important. Threads like this can be the difference between
>> coherent and useful APIs and veritable pil
On 16/10/2012 04:43, J wrote:
> Hi...
>
>
> So, what I REALLY want is to inject my start/stop markers into klogd
> rather than syslogd. This will, I hope, give my markers kernel
> timestamps rather than syslog timestamps which are not as accurate.
>
> So does anyone know of a way to do this?
On 08/09/2012 16:11, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> On Friday, 7 September 2012 02:25:15 UTC+5:30, Dave Angel wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 04:33 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Note that this difference mainly applies to how the processes are
>>
>>> themselves are created... How the library
On 16/08/2012 01:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/08/2012 01:01, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 8/15/2012 6:07 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>> On 15/08/2012 20:15, Tamer Higazi wrote:
>>>> Exactly!
>>>> NOT PROGRAMMING related has NOTHING TODO HERE!
>>>
On 16/08/2012 01:01, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 8/15/2012 6:07 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 15/08/2012 20:15, Tamer Higazi wrote:
>>> Exactly!
>>> NOT PROGRAMMING related has NOTHING TODO HERE!
>>>
>>
>> Please don't shout, please don't top post
>
> agreed.
>
>> and what gives you the right
>> to
On 09/08/2012 23:26, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 09/08/2012 22:34, Roman Vashkevich wrote:
>>> Actually, they are different.
>>> Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred
>>> thousand entri
On 09/08/2012 22:34, Roman Vashkevich wrote:
> Actually, they are different.
> Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred
> thousand entries, and you will feel the difference.
> Dict uses hashing to get a value from the dict and this is why it's O(1).
>
Sligtly off top
On 09/08/2012 01:41, bruceg113...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there a way in Python to pass arguments without listing each argument?
> For example, my program does the following:
>
> testData (z[0], z[1], z[2], z[3], z[4], z[5], z[6], z[7])
>
> Is there a clever way to pass arguments in a single st
On 29/07/2012 17:01, lipska the kat wrote:
> Pythoners
>
> Firstly, thanks to those on the tutor list who answered my questions.
>
> I'm trying to understand where Python fits into the set of commonly
> available, commercially used languages of the moment.
>
> My most recent experience is with J
On 28/07/2012 16:51, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Mark Lawrence
> wrote:
>> I highly recommend the use of notepad++. If anyone knows of a better text
>> editor for Windows please let me know :)
>
> My current preference is SciTE, available on Linux and Windows both.
On 23/07/2012 15:50, Stone Li wrote:
> I'm totally confused by this code:
>
> Code:
>
> a = None
> b = None
> c = None
> d = None
> x = [[a,b],
> [c,d]]
> e,f = x[1]
> print e,f
> c = 1
> d = 2
> print e,f
> e = 1
> f = 2
> print c,d
>
On 17/07/2012 19:36, Lipska the Kat wrote:
> On 17/07/12 19:18, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>> Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
> Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
> type
> c
On 16/07/2012 21:41, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 02:26 AM, hamilton wrote:
>> Is there any software to help understand python code ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> hamilton
>
> Sometimes to get some nice graphs I use gprof2dot
> (http://code.google.com/p/jrfonseca/wiki/Gprof2Dot)
> or doxygen (http:/
On 05/07/2012 22:46, Evan Driscoll wrote:
> On 01/-10/-28163 01:59 PM, Alexander Blinne wrote:
>> 5+0 is actually 4+0, because 5 == 4, so 5+0 gives 4.
>> 5+1 is actually 4+1, which is 5, but 5 is again 4.
>> 5+2 is 4+2 which is 6.
>
> Now all I can think is "Hoory for new math, new-hoo-hoo math" :
22 matches
Mail list logo
