Re: how to "normalize" indentation sources

John Machin wrote: > On 25/05/2006 12:00 PM, AndyL wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a lot of sources with mixed indentation typically 2 or 4 or 8 >> spaces. Is there any way to automatically convert them in let's say 4 >> spaces? >> > > Yup

deploying big python applications

Hi, let me describe how I do that today. There is standard python taken from python.org installed in a c:\python23 with at least dozen different additional python packages (e.g. SOAPpy, Twisted, wx, many smaller ones etc) included. Also python23.dll moved from c:\windows to c:\python23. This

how to "normalize" indentation sources

Hi, I have a lot of sources with mixed indentation typically 2 or 4 or 8 spaces. Is there any way to automatically convert them in let's say 4 spaces? Thx, A. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Web framework comparison video

Iain King wrote: > http://compoundthinking.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/10/framework-comparison-video/ > > Thought this might be interesting to y'all. (I can't watch it 'cos I'm > at work, so any comments about it would be appreciated :) Indeed it was. The headache factor is 1, for some reason my

Re: python equivalent of the following program

Edward Elliott wrote: > AndyL wrote: > >>Edward Elliott wrote: >> >>>And if the script runs somewhere that stderr is likely to disappear: >>> >>>prog1 = subprocess.Popen(['prog1'], stdout=file1, >>>stderr=subprocess.STDOUT) >&

Re: Chicago Python Users Group Thurs May 11 at 7pm

Brian Ray wrote: > This will be our best meeting yet! ChiPy's Monthly meeting this Thurs. > May 11, 2006. 7pm. > I will miss it. When the next is planed? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: python equivalent of the following program

Edward Elliott wrote: > Steven Bethard wrote: > >>import subprocess >> >>file1 = open('file1', 'w') >>prog1 = subprocess.Popen(['prog1'], stdout=file1) > > > And if the script runs somewhere that stderr is likely to disappear: > > prog1 = subprocess.Popen(['prog1'], stdout=file1, stderr=subproc

Re: redirecting print to a a file

Sybren Stuvel wrote: > AndyL enlightened us with: > >>And what if I want to still send the output to stdout and just a log >>it in the file as well? > > > $ python some_program.py | tee output.log > > Or write a class that has a write() function and output

Re: redirecting print to a a file

Sybren Stuvel wrote: >>I have a large program and would like to avoid touching hundreds of >>print's. > > > I can suggest using the logging module instead of print. It's much > more flexible than prints, and well suited for large programs. > Thx for the hint. I will look into that. A. -- http

Re: redirecting print to a a file

Harold Fellermann wrote: import sys sys.stdout = file("output","w") print "here you go" > > And what if I want to still send the output to stdout and just a log it in the file as well? A. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

python equivalent of the following program

Hi, What would by a python equivalent of following shell program: #!/bin/sh prog1 > file1 & prog2 > file2 & As you see, I need to spawn a few processes and redirect stdout to some files. Thx, A. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

redirecting print to a a file

Hi, Can I redirect print output, so it is send to a file, not stdout. I have a large program and would like to avoid touching hundreds of print's. Thx, Andy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: __all__ does not work?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Andy> This a mm.py module: > Andy> _all__=('getsize1',) > > Andy> size=85 > > Andy> def getsize1(): > Andy> return size > > Andy> def getsize2(): > Andy> return 2*size > > > Andy> I do not know why but getsize2 is not kept pr

__all__ does not work?

This a mm.py module: _all__=('getsize1',) size=85 def getsize1(): return size def getsize2(): return 2*size I do not know why but getsize2 is not kept priviate? $ python Python 2.4.2 (#67, Sep 28 2005, 12:41:11) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credi

Re: using range() in for loops

Paul Rubin wrote: > Normally you'd use range or xrange. range builds a complete list in > memory so can be expensive if the number is large. xrange just counts > up to that number. so when range would be used instead of xrange. if xrange is more efficient, why range was not reimplemented? --

Re: what is the the best way to express following:

Paul McGuire wrote: > "AndyL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>if type(key).__name__ == "int" or type(key).__name__ == "long": >> abc() >>elif type(key).__name__ == "str": >>

Re: what is the the best way to express following:

James Stroud wrote: > Here is a suggestion > > todo = {(int, long):abc, (str,):afg, (tuple, list):ijk} > todo[type(key)]() Is not that a shortcut? I have got "KeyError" exception ... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

what is the the best way to express following:

if type(key).__name__ == "int" or type(key).__name__ == "long": abc() elif type(key).__name__ == "str": efg() elif type(key).__name__ == "tuple" or type(key).__name__ == "list": ijk() In other words I need to determinie intiger type or string or []/() in elegant way, possibly with

Re: path to modules per import statement

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>For instance: "import my.path.module" would load module from >>./my/path/module.py? > > > Yeah, just do that. I don't understand the question, it works just like > this today. > I work on rather big set of Python applications: something like 100 .py files divided int

path to modules per import statement

Hi, is there any way to specify the path to modules within import statement (like in Java)? For instance: "import my.path.module" would load module from ./my/path/module.py? Thx, A. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

multi/double dispatch, multifunctions once again

Hi, Where I can find a module supporting that? A. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list