On 25 Jul., 18:11, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 25.07.2011 17:28, schrieb Archard Lias:
>
> > It would be great if you could elaborate a little more on that. Am I
> > not supposed to access the parent here?
>
> You must spell out the parent explicitly, otherwise subcla
On Jul 25, 2:33 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 25.07.2011 14:00, schrieb Archard Lias:
>
> > def flags(self, index):
> > if not index.isValid():
> > return Qt.ItemIsEnabled
>
> > return super(self.__class__, self).flags(index) |
>
> Your u
On Jul 25, 4:35 pm, Oliver Bestwalter wrote:
> Hello Archard,
>
> On 25.07.2011, at 16:16, Archard Lias wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 25, 2:03 pm, Ian Collins wrote:
> >> On 07/26/11 12:00 AM, Archard Lias wrote:
>
> >>> Hi,
On Jul 25, 4:39 pm, John Gordon wrote:
> In <1c175da2-79f4-40ed-803f-217dc935d...@m8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> Archard
> Lias writes:
>
> > > > return |
>
> > > It's simply a bitwise OR.
> > Yes, but how does it get determined, which one act
On Jul 25, 2:03 pm, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 07/26/11 12:00 AM, Archard Lias wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Still I dont get how I am supposed to understand the pipe and its task/
> > idea/influece on control flow, of:
> > return |
> > ??
>
> It's simpl
return Qt.ItemIsEnabled
return super(self.__class__, self).flags(index) |
Qt.ItemIsEditable
Still I dont get how I am supposed to understand the pipe and its task/
idea/influece on control flow, of:
return |
??
Thankful if you could help me with this.
Kind regards,
Archard Lias
--
http:/
