Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
Just calling basicConfig() is not problematic.
Specifying the format is what requires mental investment (because for that I
need to read up on the config options).
Would it be possible to add a simple way to select a certain logging style
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
(though calling logging.basicConfig() still produces some overhead, it does not
pull me away from the task I’m currently doing)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20345
New submission from Arne Babenhauserheide:
Currently the default operation of logging prints messages like the following:
INFO:root: Milk found.
This is close to a print-call, but not much more useful - especially not in
small scripts. To make the default settings more useful to quick scripts
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
I do not think it is necessary to change the defaults, but I do think that it
would help users of python.
In the usecase of bigger applications, the default logging format does not
matter: the overhead of logging.basicConfig() only happens once while
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
…you were faster than me (I only managed to get the repo onto my current
computer yesterday and the children kept me occupied).
Thank you!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27484/profile-docs-3.2.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27485/profile-docs-2.7.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27491/sort-argument-2.7.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27492/sort-argument-3.2.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
Jepp, I missed that. I hope the added patches clear that up.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file27492/sort-argument-3.2.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27493/sort-argument-3.2.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file27491/sort-argument-2.7.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27494/sort-argument-2.7.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
I’ll create them as soon as I get the time.
It’s not as if that’s really hard - but I still have to do it (need to diff
against current tip - I already merged, so that should work without problems
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
Copyright-assignment signed and sent.
Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
Did you get to taking a look?
Is there anything I should change?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
What would be the best way to get this patch reviewed?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Arne Babenhauserheide added the comment:
Thank you!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
New submission from Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
cProfile reports the profiling result in a table with the headers
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
The respective arguments are
calls time -cumulative - nfl
Since I had
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25696/2.7-1-headings-sortable.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25697/3.2-0-pcalls.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Changes by Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25698/3.2-1-headings-sortable.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14900
Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de added the comment:
I also think that rounding half away from zero would be the most obvious
choice, as it does not introduce a bias for random numbers distributed around 0
while being close to what I would expect from school mathematics.
The case of n
New submission from Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de:
Hi,
I just stumbled over round() errors. I read the FAQ¹, and even though the FAQ
states that this is no bug, its implementation is less than ideal.
To illustrate:
round(0.5, 1)
0.0
and
round(5, -1)
0
This is mathematically
Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de added the comment:
Better comparision of decimal and float:
timeit(a+a, setup=from decimal import Decimal, getcontext;
getcontext().prec=17; a = Decimal(1.0))
21.125790119171143
timeit(a+a, setup=a = float(1.0))
0.05324697494506836
Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de added the comment:
If the C accelerator for decimal gets decimal performance close to floats
(which I doubt, because it has to do much more), it could be very useful for
me. What is its estimated time to completion?
Even when it is finished, it does
Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de added the comment:
I did not know about rounding to even, so maybe there should be a warning in
the 2.7 documentation, that the behavior changed in python 3 (I just checked
that: python2.7 is in line with the documentation).
The first time I stumbled
Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de added the comment:
cdecimal sounds great! when is it scheduled for inclusion?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13060
29 matches
Mail list logo
