Re: PyCon video editing

2008-03-23 Thread Atom
On Mar 18, 8:09 am, amk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 17, 10:00 pm, dundeemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone know who is in charge of this? I'd like to help out if I > > could. > > I am, but haven't set anything up yet, such as a mailing list or a > host for the video. > I'll update

Re: Pycon disappointment

2008-03-20 Thread atom . anderson
On Mar 20, 2:53 pm, Erich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 20, 12:39 pm, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 20, 2008, at 11:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Number Three: Too much code, not enough concept. > > > > Presenters this one's for you. I can't count the number

Re: Pycon disappointment

2008-03-20 Thread atom . anderson
Okay! I just read this entire thread to be caught up. I am a first time PyCon-goer (as my previous post states). Because I have nothing to compare this year's experience to, I'll give it to you as I saw it. None of this is intended as a rant, (except maybe the lightning talk section;) Gripes --

Re: Pycon disappointment

2008-03-20 Thread atom . anderson
On Mar 17, 1:20 am, Paul Rubin wrote: > Stephan Deibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have to admit, I'll keep coming to PyCon even if all the talks suck > > abysmally as long as there's good hallway time, open space, BoFs, and > > sprints. ;-) > > OK, so why not get r