Ken Tilton wrote:
> John Nagle wrote:
>> Brian Adkins wrote:
>>> John Nagle wrote:
>>> If you want to restart a debate, please go back and reply to some
>>> serious post in the thread - don't hijack mine for your own evil
>>> purposes and c
John Nagle wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
>> Brian Adkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> With prices of dedicated servers and virtual private servers so cheap,
>>> why would anyone get a hosting account without root access?
>>
>> Because it turns
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Brian Adkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> With prices of dedicated servers and virtual private servers so cheap,
>> why would anyone get a hosting account without root access?
>
> Because it turns you into a sysadmin instead of letting specialist
John Nagle wrote:
> Brian Adkins wrote:
>> alex23 wrote:
>>
>>> John Nagle wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hosting providers and distro
>>>> makers aren't concerned over whether Python works. They
>>>> care if C, C++, Java, PHP, and Per
alex23 wrote:
> John Nagle wrote:
>> Hosting providers and distro
>> makers aren't concerned over whether Python works. They
>> care if C, C++, Java, PHP, and Perl work, but not Python or LISP.
>> Ask them.
>
> Do you have any real experience with recent linux distros? Or with any
> _real_ hostin
John Nagle wrote:
>Neither Lisp nor Python is an "industrial strength language".
> The infrastructure is too weak. Hosting providers and distro
> makers aren't concerned over whether Python works. They
> care if C, C++, Java, PHP, and Perl work, but not Python or LISP.
> Ask them.
>
>
George Sakkis wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> 1. Lisp is the only industrial strength language
> ^^^
> You keep using that phrase. I don't think it means what you think it
> means.
[Vizzini has just cut the rope The Dread Pirate Roberts is climbing up]
