ot; would be left intact rather than mangled, even if
> the name itself happens to be totally meaningless. So may I suggest
> something like """rustic-python""" ?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David J W
> To: python-list@python
>> Let's say they reimplement "reference python" CPython in Rust. What is
>> better? Change the "reference python" CPython name to RPython, for
>> example, or let it as CPython?
>The C implementation would still be called CPython, and the new
>implementation might be called RPython, or
