On 2005-03-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a string which I try to decompress:
>
> body = zlib.decompress(body)
>
> but I get
>
> zlib.error: Error -3 while decompressing data: incorrect header check
>
> However, I can write the string to a file and run gunzip with the
On 2005-02-28, Egil Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've written a C-module for Python, and it works as intended, but
> obviously does something wrong with its memmory management (refference
> counting), as it causes Python to segfault now and then (randomly,
> whey :S)
Have you tried compili
On 2005-02-28, Antoon Pardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op 2005-02-28, Diez B. Roggisch schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I still don't see how that is supposed to work for "a lot of interesting
>> things". Can you provide examples for one of these interesting things?
>
> Lazy evaluation where the
On 2005-02-18, Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason it does this is exactly why you said: It iterates over the
> sequence and gets the sum of the lengths, adds the length of n-1
> separators, and then allocates a string this size. Then it iterates
> over the list again to build up t
On 2005-02-07, Chris S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to determine how much memory is allocated by an arbitrary
> Python object?
The hardest part about answering this question is figuring out what
you want to count as being allocated for a particular object. That
varies widely depen
On 2004-12-26, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> string methods are nice, but nothing groundbreaking, and their niceness is
> almost entirely offset by the horrid "".join(seq) construct that keeps popping
> up when people take the "the string module is deprecated" yada yada too
> seriously
On 2004-12-18, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Dima Dorfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Both languages compile all three functions (f and the two versions of
>> g) once and choose which g to return at r
On 2004-12-18, Jeff Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would OCaml (or some
> other static language) have something that's equivalent to this?
>
> def f(x):
> if x < 0:
> def g(y):
> return y * -1
> else:
> def g(y):
> return y
> return g
>
> f
