Re: completely implicit interpolation based on a frame object (nn)

2010-12-09 Thread Edward Peschko
a bit closer here, but I'm not sure if they are workable (or usable) with 2.5... which is where I need to work. Ed One of the solutions from here might work for you: http://wiki.python.org/moin/Templating Ok, cool. A couple of followups - I'd be interested in knowing which of the

Re: completely implicit interpolation based on a frame object

2010-12-08 Thread Edward Peschko
Any ideas would be great on this, including pitfalls that people see in implementing it. http://docs.python.org/library/string.html#template-strings regards  Steve Steve, Thanks for the tip, I did look at templates and decided that they weren't quite completely what I was looking for,

using trace to do 'in place' evaluation of variables

2010-12-07 Thread Edward Peschko
All, I've been using the trace module for python (as per http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2005/04/20/tracing_python_code.html), and would very much like to have a feature there that I've implemented for perl already. Namely, I would like output in the format as described on

completely implicit interpolation based on a frame object

2010-12-07 Thread Edward Peschko
All, Ok, it looks like in order to implement a tracer that does interpolation, I'm going to have to hack around with frames. Perl's interpolation is fairly straightforward, to do interpolation of $a == 1 all you need to do is put quotes around $a == 1 to have $a evaluated. So, I'd like to do

trace options

2009-06-25 Thread Edward Peschko
All, I've been looking at the trace module, and although it looks useful, I'm surprised that there aren't a couple of features that I would have thought would be fairly basic. So, does trace support (for the --trace option): - indentation tracking stacklevel (where each function is prefixed