Re: Python Linear Programming on Ubuntu

On Sep 16, 9:44 pm, "Aaron \"Castironpi\" Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 16, 9:25 pm, Fett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 16, 9:00 pm, "Aaron \"Castironpi\" Brady" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Python Linear Programming on Ubuntu

On Sep 16, 9:00 pm, "Aaron \"Castironpi\" Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 16, 8:50 pm, Fett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I am trying to find a wrapper to do linear programming within python. > > I am using an ubuntu mac

Python Linear Programming on Ubuntu

I am trying to find a wrapper to do linear programming within python. I am using an ubuntu machine and I have apt-get'd lp_solve, which works just fine. If someone knows of a wrapper that will work with that that'd be great. I also heard that scipy has a wrapper, however, I can't find any document

Re: Can anyone suggest a good crypto package?

On Sep 4, 8:04 pm, Paul Rubin wrote: > If you just want to authenticate the strings without confidentiality, > use the built-in HMAC module. But beware of replay attacks. I looked into this and it looks like I might be able to get by with this. I didn't find this functi

Re: Can anyone suggest a good crypto package?

On Sep 4, 3:09 pm, Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is there any crypto package that is actually written in python? I > > seriously don't care how slow it is. > > I wrote a simple symmetric encryption functio

Re: Can anyone suggest a good crypto package?

On Sep 4, 2:23 pm, Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 4, 1:39 pm, Fett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I need a crypto package that works on windows with python 2.5. Can > > anyone suggest one for me? > > > I have been search

Can anyone suggest a good crypto package?

I need a crypto package that works on windows with python 2.5. Can anyone suggest one for me? I have been searching for a couple days for a good cryptography package to use for public/private key encryption, at this point I would settle for symmetric even. Every encryption package I have found fo

Re: eval() == evil? --- How to use it safely?

> Your way of thinking is similar to Microsoft's. Encrypting and Signing > is a kludge, a real fix should fix the underlying cause. Anyway using > data parsers isn't that much harder than using eval/exec. While I agree that in this situation I should do both, what would you propose for cases where

Re: eval() == evil? --- How to use it safely?

On Aug 29, 7:42 am, Fett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 28, 7:57 pm, Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So long story short: if I am expecting a dictionary of strings, I > should make a parser that only accepts a dictionary of strings then. > The

Re: eval() == evil? --- How to use it safely?

On Aug 28, 7:57 pm, Paul Rubin wrote: So long story short: if I am expecting a dictionary of strings, I should make a parser that only accepts a dictionary of strings then. There is no safe way to use an existing construct. That is what I was afraid of. I know I will ha

eval() == evil? --- How to use it safely?

I am creating a program that requires some data that must be kept up to date. What I plan is to put this data up on a web-site then have the program periodically pull the data off the web-site. My problem is that when I pull the data (currently stored as a dictionary on the site) off the site, it