Changes by Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net:
--
nosy: +forest_atq
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6721
___
___
Python-bugs
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Hi Senthil Kumaran,
Thanks for the feedback patch.
I agree having support in urllib probably makes some sense. But why not
implement basic support elsewhere and then tie it into urllib so those of us
using something else can also use
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Sure thing. I'll send it via e-mail later today.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Okay, Contributor Agreement sent.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Hi, Johannes. You can assume the Python license for this patch.
-Forest
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Hi,
Sorry for the long delay. I have tested against a Python web application using
restish via various WSGI web servers (CherryPy, wsgiref) and I have not seen
problems. It may cause problems with other server-side implementations
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Looks like bgamari and I stepped on each other's requests.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Hi,
So is the following enough to get this applied? If so, I'm game.
* Review RFC and enforce Content-Encoding: binary if applicable [checat].
* Generate CR+LF line endings [checat].
* Review RFC and address line-splitting and header
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
I haven't yet touched Python 3.0, and may not have time to dig in at the
moment. It wouldn't be suitable to provide a patch against 2.7?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Okay, I'll submit against py3k.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Should the module be called rfc2388 or should it go into email.mime as
formdata? It seems odd to put something HTML/HTTP related into email.mime, but
maybe that would be fine. In any case, httplib docs should probably point
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
As http.formdata?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
___
___
Python
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Hi,
Patch attached. Let me know what needs fixing.
I had to fix a bug in email.encoders for my tests to pass. I have not run the
full test suite at this point (need to build py3k to do that, maybe I'll have
time later today
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Éric,
Sorry, I just read your message.
I'll post a new patch with a module docstring.
I believe cgi.FieldStorage is only useful for parsing (i.e. on the server
side). MIMEMultipartFormData is for generating multipart/form-data
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Here's a new patch.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17547/http_formdata.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Hm, there is one issue. The example in the docstring wouldn't work.
You have to get the headers *after* the body, because the boundary isn't
generated until the body has been. So this would work:
body = msg.get_body()
headers
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
New patch:
* Renames class to FormData.
* Replaces method get_body with get_request_data to simplify semantics.
* Drops changes to email.encoders. I'll create a new ticket to deal with that
bug. Note that tests here fail without
New submission from Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net:
Ran into this while tackling issue3244. Encoded payload members should not be
bytes. In the case of base64, we should have an ascii string.
--
components: Library (Lib)
files: python-email-encoders-base64-str.patch
keywords
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
See issue8896 for email.encoders fix.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
I don't think Python trunk has the encoders issue, as that is related to the
base64 moving to the bytes type.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3244
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Attaching patch from reported duplicate issue8896.
--
nosy: +forest_atq
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file17551/python-email-encoders-base64-str.patch
___
Python tracker rep
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Duplicate. See issue4768.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8896
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Note that my patch is roughly the same as the original posted by haypo.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4768
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Hi,
I believe the attached implementation is reasonable. I'm not sure if it should
be called email.mime.formdata, rfc2388, etc.
I'd be happy to attach a proper patch with tests given some quick feedback.
Thanks,
Forest
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Oh, hm, looks like I left a hard-coded name=files in attach_file. I'll fix
that in the patch after I've received any other feedback.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
New submission from Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net:
This page:
http://docs.python.org/library/string.html
... should mention that the Formatter class and any associated functions
are new in Python 2.6.
--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
messages: 96493
nosy
Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net added the comment:
Ah, I didn't see it there. Oh well, do what seems right.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7527
Changes by Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net:
--
nosy: +forest_atq
versions: +Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1488934
New submission from Forest Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
[GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
u'/foo/bar'.rpartition(u'/')
(u'/foo', u'/', u'bar')
'/foo/bar'.rpartition(u'/')
(u
29 matches
Mail list logo
