"Bill Atkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John Bokma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [snip]
>
>> --
>> John MexIT: http://johnbokma.com/mexit/
>>personal page: http://johnbokma.com/
>> Exper
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dra¾en Gemiæ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There is a person on USENET, particularly in hr. hierarchy that
>> posts under three different accounts. Sometimes he argues with
>> himself, and sometimes event supports himsel
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Geoffrey Summerhayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> After you kill Navarth, will it be nothing but gruff and deedle
>> with a little wobbly to fill in the chinks?
>
Wade Humeniuk wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What I have in mind is the efficient, generation of the
> > complement S^n/WC(S^n). A good program should initialize, generate, and
> > terminate.
> >
> > T=cartprodex(S,n,WC); //initialize
> > for all i in T do
> > what you want with i
> >
"Dinko Tenev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It would seem that your program is just filtering the full cartesian
>> product, right? The solution I'm looking for generates the elements
>> one-by-one so that it could be used in a loop.
>
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> After the basic fact of generating the exclusion - a considerable
> achievement - the program should be interactive. What if the target set
> has thousands or millions of elements? There should be a loop-like way
> ('do' in Haskell, f
Ken Tilton wrote:
> alex23 wrote:
> > Xah Lee wrote:
> >
> >>No personal offense intended, but human animal's history is what? 3000
> >>years at least in recorded history? And, all you can think of is what,
> >>the view points of a fraction of your personal life span?
> >
> >
> > Thank god evoluti
