ng like...
(define (apply fun args)
(eval (cons fun args)))
...but "eval" seems a little like overkill. Is there a better way?
Greg Buchholz
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ray, so you can't use an index from one array
with a different array. You'll probably also enjoy the paper...
"Eliminating Array Bound Checking Through Dependent Types"
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/xi98eliminating.html
...and DML itself...
http://www.cs.bu.edu/~hw
Chris F Clark wrote:
> Very impressive. It looks right to me and simple enough to
> understand. I must find the time to learn a modern FP language. Can
> you write a fold for this that prints the data as a binary tree of
> triples? I have to believe it isn't that hard
{- Refactoring this a
Chris F Clark wrote:
> Thus, as we traverse a list, the first element might be an integer,
> the second a floating point value, the third a sub-list, the fourth
> and fifth, two more integers, and so on. If you look statically at
> the head of the list, we have a very wide union of types going by.
George Neuner wrote:
> You can't totally prevent it ... if the index computation involves
> types having a wider range, frequently the solution is to compute a
> wide index value and then narrow it. But if the wider value is out of
> range for the narrow type you have a problem.
>
...snip...
>
> T
