Jörn Hees <nrej9...@joernhees.de> added the comment:
oh, how convenient... as a logged in user i can just see every other user's
email... but there's more, I can just go to
https://bugs.python.org/user?@startwith=0&@pagesize=3&@sort=username and
see all "obfuscated&quo
New submission from Jörn Hees <nrej9...@joernhees.de>:
On every platform that i create an account on, i use a new randomized email
address. This allows me to track which platforms sell my account info to
spammers.
The one i used for bugs.python.org now receives astonishing amounts o
Change by Jörn Hees <nrej9...@joernhees.de>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4344
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Jörn Hees <nrej9...@joernhees.de>:
The allow_abbrev option (default True) currently is documented like this
(https://docs.python.org/3/library/argparse.html#allow-abbrev):
> Normally, when you pass an argument list to the parse_args() method of an
> Ar
Changes by Jörn Hees <nrej9...@joernhees.de>:
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Jörn Hees added the comment:
It's been a while... nowadays I would mostly change the documentation of the
quote function to point out that it is likely to quote more characters than
absolutely necessary by SPEC. The function is in place for so long, (even in
py3) that people will rely
Changes by Jörn Hees <nrej9...@joernhees.de>:
--
pull_requests: +2638
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12910>
___
_
Jörn Hees added the comment:
I'm closing this because the OP's original concern about wanting an in-place
operation was already solved
Was it? Are you referring to http://bugs.python.org/issue13121 ?
My main concern was that += is considerably slower than .update(), kind of
catching me off
Jörn Hees added the comment:
cool
minor question:
- in the given patch __add__ uses __iadd__, but __sub__ doesn't use __isub__,
which seems a bit weird.
maybe off-topic, but maybe not, because of _keep_positive(self):
- is there place for a non multi-set centric Stats object which is like
On 11 Apr 2014, at 01:34, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 4/10/2014 6:45 PM, Jörn Hees wrote:
what do you think about officially supporting Semantic Versioning?
(http://semver.org )
It is a nice fantasy.
;) didn’t say it’s perfect, just that it’s widely used and we should support
Hi,
what do you think about officially supporting Semantic Versioning?
( http://semver.org )
Semantic Versioning has gained a lot of attention in other programming
languages. Even though not officially supported, many python libraries use it
as well (just search the pypi listing for things like
New submission from Jörn Hees nrej9...@joernhees.de:
I wanted to create a function registrar d using a defaultdict. The library
that this registrar is passed to expects it to return functions taking 3 args.
Now if the first call is d.get(x) it seems that in contrast to d[x] the default
arg
New submission from Jörn Hees nrej9...@joernhees.de:
urllib.quote('()')
returns '%28%29'
Looking into its code it tries to follow RFC 2396 (which is good even though it
should follow rfc3986 nowadays), but it doesn't:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2396 (see Appendix A, p.27
13 matches
Mail list logo
