Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>James Graves wrote:
>>
>> If you want to do application development, Common Lisp is where it's
>> at, no doubt about it. There are more and better libraries for CL
>> these days, and they are easier to inst
Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>James Graves wrote:
>>
>> So with Python 3000, you're going to end up with a language just as
>> big as CL, but without the most fundamental building blocks. Ah
>> well, to each his own.
>
>Preventing
d up with a language just as big
as CL, but without the most fundamental building blocks. Ah well, to
each his own.
My Road to Lisp was long and twisty. For a while it covered some Python
territory. But I started look into where exactly the interesting bits
of Python came from. And here I am. Though I've still got a lot to
learn.
James Graves
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
