Re: Calling GPL code from a Python application

2006-01-04 Thread Karl A. Krueger
a "backup *nudge nudge wink wink*". An analogous provision exists in U.S. law, indeed in the same chapter cited above. It also covers copies made in the course of repairing a computer. -- Karl A. Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> { s/example/whoi/ } -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Calling GPL code from a Python application

2006-01-03 Thread Karl A. Krueger
tute *exempting* the running of software (and the making of backups) from copyright protection. That is, copyright does *not* grant the holder the right to restrain users from executing a copy of software that they have legally obtained. http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#117 -- Kar

Re: Software licenses and releasing Python programs for review

2005-06-02 Thread Karl A. Krueger
alone. Of course, if your customer is a proprietary software firm looking to own and sell the software restrictively, then they don't want those terms. But if they're just looking to use it privately and internally, I'm curious how the GPL would get in the way of that.

Re: Regular Expressions - Python vs Perl

2005-04-21 Thread Karl A. Krueger
on, there do exist at least some Perl-compatible regex libraries in other non-Perl languages, which don't use libpcre. An example is CL-PPCRE (http://www.weitz.de/cl-ppcre/), which claims to be "more compatible with the regex semantics of Perl 5.8.0 than, say, Perl 5.6.1 is." --