On Apr 13, 8:44 pm, Ron Garret [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ron Garret [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does
anyone know of a straightforward way to get Apache to forward requests
to a given path to another HTTP server running on a different port?
Never mind, I think
On Mar 31, 8:38 am, Bjoern Schliessmann usenet-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Dufour wrote:
Shed Skin allows for translation of pure (unmodified), implicitly
statically typed Python programs into optimized C++, and hence,
^
On Mar 31, 10:31 pm, Bjoern Schliessmann usenet-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
I think he should be taken very seriously.
Agreed.
Okay, it seems focusing a discussion on one single point is
difficult for many people. Next time I'll be mind-bogglingly clear
that even
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
==
PyPy 1.0: JIT compilers for free and more
==
Welcome to the PyPy 1.0 release - a milestone integrating the results
of four years of research, engineering, management and sprinting
On Mar 19, 11:44 am, king kikapu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know much about PythonCard or wxGlade, but I use wxPython (which
wxGlade uses, right?) and you now have the option to separate your GUI
and code using an XRC file (xml file that describes layout). So perhaps
this is
Please forgive me if what I'm asking is non sense...
I created a little program to authomate the creation of the setup.py
script for py2exe.
It simply prompts for the main executable script name and then creates
setup.py, as follows:
# this is makesetup.py
nombre = raw_input('File name?: ')
f
On Mar 19, 9:25 pm, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
En Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:46:56 -0300, Luis M. González [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
What I want now is execute the script I just created.
As far as I know, the only way to execute the script is from a command
line and typing
On Mar 19, 10:49 pm, zacherates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 19, 9:42 pm, Luis M. González [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 19, 9:25 pm, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
En Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:46:56 -0300, Luis M. González [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
What I want now
On Mar 19, 11:52 pm, Steven Bethard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
On Mar 19, 10:49 pm, zacherates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This implies that `os.system(setuppy py2exe)` should do what you
want.
It works!
Thank you, this is just what I wanted.
You'll get better
On Mar 2, 8:29 pm, MonkeeSage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 28, 1:26 pm, Luis M. González [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've come across a code snippet inwww.rubyclr.comwhere they show how
easy it is to declare a class compared to equivalent code in c#.
I wonder if there is any way to emulate
On Mar 1, 3:03 pm, Arnaud Delobelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 1, 4:01 pm, Steven Bethard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
[...]
This does pretty much the same thing as the recipe I posted:
Not at all. My new_struct create returns a new class which is similar
to a C
On Feb 27, 9:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was anybody blogging about PyCon (talks and/or sprints)? Got any pointers?
Thanks,
Skip
http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=entab=wbq=pyconbtnG=Search+Blogs
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I've come across a code snippet in www.rubyclr.com where they show how
easy it is to declare a class compared to equivalent code in c#.
I wonder if there is any way to emulate this in Python.
The code is as follows:
Person = struct.new( :name, :birthday, :children)
I tried something like this,
On Feb 28, 6:21 pm, Steven Bethard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
I've come across a code snippet inwww.rubyclr.comwhere they show how
easy it is to declare a class compared to equivalent code in c#.
I wonder if there is any way to emulate this in Python.
The code
Emin wrote:
Dear Experts,
When writing large classes, I sometimes find myself needing to copy a
lot of parameters from the argument of __init__ into self. Instead of
having twenty lines that all basically say something like self.x = x, I
often use __dict__ via something like:
class
mc wrote:
Is there an easy way to compile a Python class (or set of classes) into
a .DLL that a C# program can call? Or otherwise to use an existing
library of Python classes from a C# program as seamlessly as possible?
I'm affraid this is not possible.
Ironpython (the .NET python
Leandro Ardissone wrote:
great, thanks
And how I can compare this type 'str' output ?
I want to decide what to do if the var is an string and what to do if
not..
Tried with:
if type(artistList) == type 'list':
and
if type(artistList) == list:
but nothing..
You shouldn't enclose
Cameron Laird ha escrito:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Luis M. González [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
.
.
Then look no further. Learn python and go kick php developers asses in
the market place.
There are thousands of php
Fredrik Lundh ha escrito:
Luis M. González wrote:
But as a web development language, it's olnly when people started to
look for the rails killer and many python alternatives started to
come up (although Django has been in development for a long time before
all this hype).
nah, people
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrito:
Luis M. González wrote:
Cameron Laird ha escrito:
Perhaps it's timely to clarify the newer above: Guido
made Python public in '89-90, and Rasmus showed PHP to
others in '94-95.
OK. But since when has python been considered a viable alternative
walterbyrd ha escrito:
Luis M. González wrote:
the new crop of web frameworks (Django, Turbo Gears, etc...).
- Newer versions of mod_python require Apache 2.0, which few hosters
have
You can also get alder versions of mod_python. What's the problem?
The problem
- Python is more readable, and more general purpose
Yes, php is only for web.
On the other hand, Python is a general purpose language and it can be
used for nearly anything you may want to do.
- PHP has awful backward compatibility
Yes. And it's also an ugly language to work with.
- PHP
Yes, php is only for web.
Absolutely false. Most of my standalone, command-line scripts for
manipulating my unix users in LDAP are written in PHP, although we're
rewriting them in python.
Although I can't think of a single app written in php that's not web-
based (other than standalone
kaushal wrote:
Hi
How do i start Learning Python,is there any reference material which I
can refer since I dont have
any programming experience
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
If you have no programming experience at all, I highly recomend Non
Programmers Tutorial for Python by Josh
This isn't probably the answer you are looking for, but a good solution
that worked for me is Cheetah. Cheetah is a template engine, which is
mainly used for web applications, but that can be used for generating
all kinds of text documents.
For example, I use it for creating invoices in html
Chris wrote:
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Chris wrote:
Jim Hugunin wrote:
I'm extremely happy to announce that we have released IronPython 1.0
today!
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython
snip
I'm no code guru but it sounds interesting. So can I import numpy,
scipy, matplotlib,
falcon wrote:
Can someone please recommend a python web app framework which doesn't
abstract away sql in favor of python objects?
As far as I can tell, frameworks such as django, turbo gears, etc.
allow one to drop down the the sql layer, however that is not the most
effecient use of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is how difficult is to set up a web server that can run
python easy ? should I try ZOPE or there is something better in mind ?
I also second the suggestion of using Karrigell.
It comes with its own built-in server, and the task would be as simle
as writing
If you want to know the names of the fields on a recordset, you can use
cursor.description.
For example, lets say you have a connection to a MySQL database:
con = MySQLdb.connect('localhost','root','','mydb')
cur = con.cursor()
cur.execute('select * from customers')
result = cur.fetchall()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrito:
At http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/davidmertz David
Mertz writes
Presumably with 2.7 (and later 2.x versions), there will be a means of
warning developers of constructs that are likely to cause porting
issues [to Python 3000]. In the simplest
Try this:
import os
os.startfile('cabel.py')
This should work with any program or file, not only python ones.
Hope this helps,
Luis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Ruby crowd says you guys are no where
near as friendly as them!
Slander! Defamation!
The time to crush our enemies has come.
This is the Jihad! Death to the infidels
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 22:25 -0700, Luis M. González wrote:
I don't have experience with Django or any other python framework, but
I have used bare-bones mod_python and it rocks.
I wouldn't use PSP though...
It is not very polished, and they way it handles
Delaney, Timothy (Tim) wrote:
Edmond Dantes wrote:
Of course, it's all what you really mean by clever. To me, being
clever partly means writing code without bugs in the first place,
so there is nothing that needs debugging
Clever in this context generally means using a
I don't have experience with Django or any other python framework, but
I have used bare-bones mod_python and it rocks.
I wouldn't use PSP though...
It is not very polished, and they way it handles the indentation
problem in python is a little bit confussing.
IMHO the best way of using mod_python
John Salerno wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
I'm curious, why it didn't work?
I sent them an email recently, asking about mod_python support, and
they replied afirmatively, and very quickly. They also said that they
can install other scripts on demand.
But I never tried them though
John Salerno wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
John Salerno wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
I'm curious, why it didn't work?
I sent them an email recently, asking about mod_python support, and
they replied afirmatively, and very quickly. They also said that they
can install other
John Salerno wrote:
John Salerno wrote:
Bayazee wrote:
i want a free hosting for python .
so i can make my scripts and upload to server .
i want to use mod_python ...
good luck with that...
p.s. you might look into http://dollar-hosting.org/
it's very cheap and supposedly
Gaurav Agarwal wrote:
Hi,
Am using WAMP5 and python 2.4.3. I tried to install mod_python 3.2.5
for python2.4. When i tried starting wamp, Firstly there was no error
message in the apache error log. I saw error message in windows event
viewer :
The Apache service named Apache.exe reported
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
def doIt(name=None):
global gname
if name is None:
name = gname
else:
gname = name
Sorry for this very basic question, but I don't understand why I should
add the global into the function body before using it.
This function works even if I don't
nate wrote:
try this:
gname = 'nate'
def test():
gname = 'amy'
print gname
test()
print gname
outputs:
'amy'
'nate'
whereas this:
gname = 'nate'
def test():
global gname
gname = 'amy'
print gname
test()
print gname
outputs:
'amy'
'amy'
OK, so I should
Markus Wankus wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 19:41:36 -0400, Luis M. González [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
.
.
OK, so I should include the global only if I plan to modify it.
Otherwise, I don't need to include it. Am I right?
Correct. Globals are always available to read from. You need
Pypy aims to become (probably sometime next year) a strong candidate to
replace cpython as the main python implementation.
Its goals are very ambicious and one of them is making it fast.
Some of its developers even think it can get as fast as C, although I
think that if it can get as fast as java,
. wrote:
What is the fast way for a fast implementation of Python?
--
JavaScript implementation of Python
http://groups.google.it/group/JSython/
Check this out:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/news.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Alok wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
Alok wrote:
I was merely describing my experience and inviting others' response
about theirs.
That's exactly what I'm doing.
You misinterpret, I was talking about my experience with the site and
inviting response from other people about
Alok wrote:
While posting a comment on http://www.reddit.com I got an error page
with the following curious statement on it.
reddit broke (sorry)
looks like we shouldn't have stopped using lisp...
See screenshot at
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1773/1980/1600/reddit-broke.jpg
Alok wrote:
I was merely describing my experience and inviting others' response
about theirs.
That's exactly what I'm doing.
Please don't misconstrue that as a blame on any language.
I think it can be interpreted in many ways.
Now if you're not ready to read other people's oppinions, don't
K.S.Sreeram wrote:
Have people lost all sense of humor?? Its just reddit's attempt at
humor! I've rarely seen any server errors on reddit, but even when I do
see one.. its funny!
Here's another one:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pvera/sets/72057594050280833/
Check out their testimonials,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi guys ,
I' m new to python ...and I would like to ask you , wich is the best
template for developing dinamic generated pages using python ?
I would like to use something easy to install and develop like php ?
? tags and with a lots of features .
thanks in
per9000 wrote:
Hi python people,
I am working with .NET (in C++/CLI and C#) but since I really love
python I'd like to do things for .NET (or whatever) from python.
Has anyone tried it?
What (costless) compilers are good?
Are there any (costless) editors like MS Visual Express you have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Luis ,
Thanks for your kindly answer , so you say that installing mod_python
and a template like chetaah or dyango I can do like as I do with php
and Apache ?
Do not get confussed:
Django is a complete web development framework, and Cheetah is just a
template
Just to give you an idea of what it is, you can check this article:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/python/2004/02/26/python_server_pages.html...
This explains the whole thing much better than I did with my poor
english...
Luis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Andy Dingley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Python newbie: I've got this simple task working (in about ten
different ways), but I'm looking for the favoured and most Python
like way.
Forwards I can do this
for t in listOfThings:
print t
Now how do I do it in reverse? In particular, how
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am newbie learning wxPython. I tried using GUI designer called
wxGlade. When it generated code I couldnt get the same level of
flexibility as writing the code by oneself.
Any view on what you think about using GUI designer tools.
Every help is appreciated.
Try
Thomas Guettler wrote:
There are some things in Python I don't know very well: Decorators and
generators. But somehow I don't think that I really need them.
I think that I learn best when I have a problem and I'm trying to solve
it.
There are features that you don't know what they're for, and
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
I'd like something a bit like a module,
but I'd like to make several of them,
and not have them interfere with each other.
Thank you. I sense what you are saying, but at this point I'd be
thinking, Why not just make several modules? :) I'll get to it. I've
got
Jan Bijsterbosch wrote:
Hello Luis,
Luis M. González [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I happen to have delphi, so if someone wants me to make small changes,
just let me know, I'll try to help
Hmm... now that you offer, would
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
But semantically it is a proper functional language. The features may
not attract Python users who might prefer Boo/Jython/IronPython. But it
does offer something to disillusioned Groovy users.
Are they disillusioned? Just wondering.
Diez
Whay talking about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scala seems terse and fast enough, few examples:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4sandbox/benchmark.php?test=alllang=psycolang2=scala
Bye,
bearophile
Static typing, type inference, sequence comprehensions...
Looks that there's a new crop of programming languages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I happen to have delphi, so if someone wants me to make small changes,
just let me know, I'll try to help
Hmm... now that you offer, would it be possible to have the colors of
text just like in IDLE?
I tried configuring the colors, but some of them don't exist as
Jonathan Ellis wrote:
ago wrote:
I have just discovered Python Scripter by Kiriakos Vlahos and it was a
pleasant surprise. I thought that it deserved to be signalled. It is
slim and fairly fast, with embedded graphical debugger, class browser,
file browser... If you are into graphical
Fuzzyman wrote:
FWIW I agree. If anyone didn't want to answer the question they didn't
need to.
Why be rude to someone asking a polite question. It's not as if there
isn't much more *worse* noise on this group.
I also agree.
Although the question may have appeared out of place, it wasn't
I don't know if it works this way with Oracle, but the python dbpai has
the cursor.description method that can help. For example:
cur.execute( your query here )
columns = [i[0] for i in cur.description]
cur.description gives a lot of data about your recordset, and the first
field is the column
Erik Max Francis wrote:
Yeah, what jerks. They actually wanted to talk about Python, not some
random other language that you're trying to learn that has nothing to do
with it ...
There are thousands of threads to choose from in this forum.
If they didn't like this question, they could have
Mike Meng wrote:
Hi all,
I just finished reading Learning Python 3rd ed, and am doing my
first Python application, which retrieves and process text and XML
documents from Web. Python helped me to write the application in a few
hours, I'm very happy with its productivity. But the
I didn't know it wasn't a free ebook. I realized it once I downloaded
it.
But it's such a good book that I decided to buy a hard copy.
This way I will support its author, while getting a very good book on
Python.
Luis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ravi Teja wrote:
Also, IronPython cannot access CPython libraries. So it cannot be used
as a drop-in replacement for CPython in most non-trivial apps. Python
for .NET however allows you to both use both CPython and .NET
libraries.
It will be able to access the standard libraries, as long as
Ravi Teja wrote:
Also, IronPython cannot access CPython libraries. So it cannot be used
as a drop-in replacement for CPython in most non-trivial apps. Python
for .NET however allows you to both use both CPython and .NET
libraries.
It will be able to access the standard libraries, as long as
Free online resources for learning Python:
To get started, I strongly suggest Josh Cogliati's Non-Programmers
Tutorial for Python ( http://honors.montana.edu/~jjc/easytut/easytut/
).
I learned programming with this little tutorial, which is a very good
introduction.
After that, you could check
Check it out:
http://www.gotdotnet.com/workspaces/workspace.aspx?id=ad7acff7-ab1e-4bcb-99c0-57ac5a3a9742
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Well, basically, ironpython is to .NET what jython is to JAVA.
It is a faithful implementation of the python language, written in c#,
created to run on and take full advantage of the .NET framework.
That means that you have access to all the available libraries of the
.NET framework and you can
IMHO, there's nothing more annoying that a website showing me a
progression bar, indicating how much time it will get to provide the
information I'm looking for...
And when the progression bar ends, I have to wait until the flashy
graphics and stupid presentation shows me the go to html site...
I
PythonCard is based on wxpython and it's free:
http://pythoncard.sourceforge.net/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
First of all, you should be thinking about ironpython instead of
cpython.
This way you can forget about c# and do it all in (iron)python.
I don't know its current state, but Microsoft is working in a Visual
Studio - Ironpython integration.
For more info:
Now that I think about it, I'm not sure if Visual Studio can create
GUIs with ironpython already. I guess that at this moment, its
integration is as a text editor only (I may be wrong though).
I almost forgot it, but someone was working in a little tool that
converts C# forms into python classes
18 months? Wow!.. time flies...
Anyway, PythonCard is a fine product, and it's very good just the way
it is.
It would be great if a new release comes up though...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I suggest checking out PythonCard.
It's a GUI builder based on wxPython and it's very easy to use.
It offers the basic functionality of Delphi or VB, letting you drag
drop widgets on a form.
This visual way of dealing with widgets authomatically creates a file
with the form and its controls
Check PythonCard:
http://pythoncard.sourceforge.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
First of all, let me tell you that you can now write apps for .NET with
Python.
There's a python implementation for the .NET framework called
Ironpython (in beta 5 now).
Regarding XML, I can't tell you much but in general, python is much
easier, cleaner, concise and intuitive than all the other
When you talk about the Karrigell folks it looks like there's a bunch
of guys out there ploting to rule the world. It's nothing like that.
I just read Pierre's comments about this article, and decided to post a
message in comp.lang.python to let everybody know about it.
Perhaps my post looked
For those interested in the simplest, easiest and most pythonic web
framework out there, there's a new page in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karrigell
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
You should check Shed Skin (Python-to-C++ Compiler):
http://shed-skin.blogspot.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
PyPy is now able to compile efficient extension modules!.
This was recently announced by Christian Tismer on Pypy's mailing list.
To learn more:
http://codespeak.net/pipermail/pypy-dev/2006q1/002911.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
This is strange... I've been trying to access this site since
yesterday, but I couldn't (Firefox can't stabilish connection with
server www.doxdesk.com).
However, I seem to be the only one with this problem...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I wouldn't want to sound like I'm criticizing other people's work.
To those who offered their time to create this site, which is quite an
improvement over the old one, thank you!
However, I like the idea of a contest. Both for the site and for the
logo.
Perhaps something cool could come up from
I don't know if python is Zend.
It's quite minimalistic and it flows very well, so I guess it is a...
Feng-shui language?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Well. ... the PyPy team works on ... is definitively much too strong.
It is more like ... the PyPy team is thinking about It is very
unclear whether it will work on a technical level and whether the EU
will allow us to allocate resources
IMO, it's the lack of competing implementations.
I beg to differ in this point.
There are other implementations, but they are not called python and
they are not a 100% python in syntax and features.
For example, Boo is 95% python syntax wise, but statically typed.
This fundamental difference
eval is not necessary in this case.
If you have a tuple with function names such as this: x=(printFoo,
printFOO)
you can execute them this way:
for f in x:
f()
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Just a few comments...
Database:
As with anything else, try to keep it simple until you need to make it
complex.
Sqlite is the simplier alternative, and it's also the fastest for the
intended use (small number of users, simple selects, etc). MySQL is
also a very good alternative and much more
Use input to enter numbers, and raw_input to enter strings.
For example:
x = input('Enter your age: ')
y = raw_input('Enter your name: ')
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I second the suggestion of using Boo for this case.
Why use Delphi or VB when you have a more pythonic first class .NET
language?
You already have a very good IDE for creating your project
(SharpDevelop), which is free, open source and already has the Boo
bindings included (download here the
I think that this posted message in Jim Hugunin's weblog clearly shows
what are Microsoft intentions regarding Python and other dynamic
languages:
http://blogs.msdn.com/hugunin/archive/2006/01/05/509812.aspx
We're hiring full-time and summer interns!
We're looking for a few exceptionally
Karrigell lets you run pure python scripts, although not directly in
Apache.
It uses its own server running behind apache.
You can code in 4 styles:
-pure python scripts
-python in html (like in PHP)
-html in python
-karrigell services (mapping functions to urls)
http://karrigell.sf.net
Hope
Ray wrote:
But then again, once you start using .NET class you're tied to .NET
anyway so this is not a big problem, I think--although the more
perfectionist among us might like to isolate parts of Python code that
are .NET/IP specific to make porting easier if it ever comes to that...
That's
EP wrote:
- create a more prevalent version of Python that is less Pythonic or
undermines some of the principles of the language, basically usurping
Python as we conceive it in the process...
I understand all the concerns, the evil empire and all that..
But I think nothing of this will
Oh, yeah, that's undoubtedly true. What I was referring to were things
such as using [] for generic, that doesn't exist in current CPython
does it?
I'm not en expert on the subject, but I guess that any language
implementation running on .Net should be able to at least understand
generics or
Ironpython has been in development from awhile, and now it's in beta
version 1.0.
Is it good to have Python running on every existing platform out there?
Of course it is.
Is it good to have Python running on Java and .NET?
Sure, why not? One of the good things about Python is that it runs
IronPython as it is now is already slightly different from CPython
isn't it? Because it has to capture features of CLR languages that are
not in Python (such as using generic containers).
Hmm... I'm not sure what you mean by capture features of CLR.
I think Ironpython is a faithful
This function return a tuple of value-key pairs, sorted by value:
x = {'a':3, 'b':2, 'c':4}
def sortByValue(myDict):
return sorted( [(v,k) for k,v in myDict.items()] )
If you want to get the first two value-key pairs:
sortByValue(x)[:2]
[(2, 'b'), (3, 'a')]
Hope this helps...
Luis
101 - 200 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
