Ant wrote:
If you have to trick the compiler like this though, I'd take a good
look at *why* you want to couple the modules so tightly in the first
place!
Yeah, you're right. I think loosening up the coupling by introducing a
module which holds common shared data is probably a good idea
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
wxPython are the Python bindings to wxWidgets which is a C++ library.
Don't want to hijack the thread, but since it's answered already:
Has wxWidgets finally arrived at migrating to GTK2? ^^
If so, I might consider using wxPython instead of pygtk for that small
Hi,
I am getting strange errors when I am importing modules cross-wise, like
this:
# module A
import B
var1 = x
B.var2 = y
# module B
import A
var2 = z
print A.var1
The error messages are not even sane, for example the interpreter
complains about not finding 'var1' in module A.
Is there a
Ivan Herman wrote:
I know this is not the ideal answer, but maybe it helps...
It does, thanks Ivan.
Regards,
Matthias
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
I have to say I am confused about the documentation on pyxml.sf.net.
When I want to use DOM, I effectively am using a class called Sax2? ^^
I also have to catch SAXExceptions, which reside in xml.sax._exceptions.
I thought DOM and SAX are two completely different things. Why is PyXML
mixing
Oh and:
Where can I find an API reference for PyXML? Am I supposed to /guess/
which methods and attributes e.g. Sax2 supplies? :D
Thanks again,
Matthias
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven Bethard wrote:
I don't have an answer to your real question, but if you're not
committed to a particular XML package yet, you might consider ElementTree:
http://effbot.org/zone/element-index.htm
The API is much simpler, and the package has a much more sane
organization. ;)
Heiko Wundram wrote:
Brian Beck wrote:
class D1(Base):
def foo(self):
print D1
class D2(Base):
def foo(self):
print D2
obj = Base() # I want a base class reference which is polymorphic
if (need D1):
obj = D1()
else:
obj = D2()
I have no idea what you're trying to do
Brian Beck wrote:
def foo(self):
raise NotImplementedError(Subclasses must implement foo)
That's actually a good idea, though not as nice as a check at
compile-time (jesus, I'm probably talking in C++ speech again, is
there such a thing as compile-time in Python at all?!)
Another thing
That was quite insightful Martin, thanks.
Regards,
Matthias
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gene tani wrote:
http://naeblis.cx/rtomayko/2004/12/15/the-static-method-thing
http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/java-is-not-python-either.html
http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html
http://idevnews.com/PrintVersion_CaseStudies.asp?Search3=web+servicesGo2=GoID=118
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just follow the links.
I'll try ;-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
sorry for my ignorance, but after reading the Python tutorial on
python.org, I'm sort of, well surprised about the lack of OOP
capabilities in python. Honestly, I don't even see the point at all of
how OO actually works in Python.
For one, is there any good reason why I should ever
13 matches
Mail list logo
