Re: languages with full unicode support

2006-07-02 Thread Oliver Bandel
Matthias Blume wrote: Tin Gherdanarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oliver Bandel wrote: こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-) Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful with such things in real life; Koreans might beat you up for this. Stay alive! And the Japanese might beat him up, too

Re: languages with full unicode support

2006-06-25 Thread Oliver Bandel
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-) Xah Lee wrote: Languages with Full Unicode Support As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode. Can you explain what you mena with the names here? (the JavaScript

Re: Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code

2006-05-18 Thread Oliver Bandel
Jonathon McKitrick wrote: Pascal Bourguignon wrote: (defun ιοτα (key (номер 10) (단계 1) (בכוכ 0)) (loop :for i :from בכוכ :to номер :by 단계 :collect i)) How do you even *enter* these characters? My browser seems to trap all the special character combinations, and I *know* you don't mean

Re: Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code

2006-05-16 Thread Oliver Bandel
Xah Lee wrote: Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code Xah Lee, 2006-05-13 In coding a computer program, there's often the choices of tabs or spaces for code indentation. There is a large amount of confusion about which is better. It has become what's known as “religious war” — a heated fight

Re: Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code

2006-05-16 Thread Oliver Bandel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opalinski from opalpaweb wrote: Simply put, tabs is proper, and spaces are improper. Why? This may seem ridiculously simple given the de facto ball of confusion: the semantics of tabs is what indenting is about, while, using spaces to align code is a hack. The reality of