On Mar 19, 9:41 am, Kottiyath wrote:
> On Mar 19, 9:33 pm, Kottiyath wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 19, 8:42 pm, Paul McGuire wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 19, 4:39 am, Kottiyath wrote:
>
> > > > I understand that my question was foolish, even for a newbie.
> > > > I will not ask any more such questions in th
On Mar 5, 1:22 pm, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2009/3/5 andrew cooke :
>
> > Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> >> Paul Hildebrandt yahoo.com> writes:
> >>> I really like the look of Sphinx BUT I want autogenerated
> >>> documentation like Epydoc/doxygen.
I really like the look of Sphinx BUT I want autogenerated
documentation like Epydoc/doxygen. Does anyone know of a frontend for
Sphix that will make it work like Epydoc?
Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I was just reading what's new with Python 3.0
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html
I like this prerequisite to porting: "Start with excellent test
coverage"
May I suggest looking into Pythoscope for those looking to boost test
coverage.
http://pythoscope.org
Paul
--
http://mail.pyth
Pythoscope, the Python unit test generator, is growing and maturing.
Over the last three months we've made pretty incredible progress.
We've had a full time developer and part time project manager.
Where we are:
Technical:
* Static analysis of code. With this we can generate and maintain unit
test
