On May 27, 12:16 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure that CPython uses the GIL regardless of platform. And
> > yes you can have multiple OS-level threads, but because of the GIL
> > only one will actually be running at a time. Other
On 26 May, 20:22, Carlos Nepomuceno
wrote:
>
>
> > Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 11:13:12 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion
> > From: peter.h.m.bro...@gmail.com
> > To: python-l...@python.org
> [...]
> >> How can you get 140% of CPU? I
On 26 May, 20:09, Carlos Nepomuceno
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 10:21:05 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Solving the problem of mutual recursion
> > From: peter.h.m.bro...@gmail.com
> > To: python-l...@python.org
>
> > On May 26, 5:09 pm, J
On May 26, 5:09 pm, Jussi Piitulainen
wrote:
>
> A light-weighter way is to have each task end by assigning the next
> task and returning, instead of calling the next task directly. When a
> task returns, a driver loop will call the assigned task, which again
> does a bounded amount of work, assig
I'm not sure if this'll interest anybody, but I expect that I'm going
to get some mutual recursion in my simulation, so I needed to see how
python handled it. Unfortunately, it falls over once it detects a
certain level of recursion. This is reasonable as, otherwise, the
stack eventually over-fills
On May 24, 11:33 pm, Carlos Nepomuceno
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:01:35 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Simple algorithm question - how to reorder a sequence
> > economically
> > From: peter.h.m.bro...@gmail.com
> > To: python-l...@pyt
On May 24, 6:13 pm, Carlos Nepomuceno
wrote:
> Not exactly what you want but you may consider Google ACL XML[1].
>
> If there aren't any system integration restrictions you can do what you think
> it's best... for now.
>
> [1]https://developers.google.com/storage/docs/accesscontrol#applyacls
>
Th
On May 24, 6:42 pm, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 02:18 AM, Peter Brooks wrote:
>
> > I'm designing a system that should allow different views to different
> > audiences. I understand that I can use application logic to control
> > the access security, but
On May 24, 5:00 pm, Carlos Nepomuceno
wrote:
>
>
> I don't know what "spurious evidence of correlation" is. Can you give a
> mathematical definition?
>
If I run the simulation with the same sequence, then, because event E1
always comes before event E2, somebody might believe that there is a
causa
Thank you all for those most helpful suggestions! random.shuffle does
precisely the job that I need quickly. Thank you for introducing me to
itertools, though, I should have remembered APL did this in a symbol
or two and I'm sure that itertools will come in handy in future.
Thanks for the warnings
I'm designing a system that should allow different views to different
audiences. I understand that I can use application logic to control
the access security, but it seems to me that it'd make more sense to
have this documented in the data-stream so that it's data-driven.
I was wondering if there
What is the easiest way to reorder a sequence pseudo-randomly?
That is, for a sequence 1,2,3,4 to produce an arbitrary ordering (eg
2,1,4,3) that is different each time.
I'm writing a simulation and would like to visit all the nodes in a
different order at each iteration of the simulation to remo
12 matches
Mail list logo
