ng why you'd expect to have a conversation about
one concrete and specialized topic in a venue devoted to an entirely
different concrete and specialized topic.
Cheers,
Pillsy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Pascal Costanza wrote:
> Pillsy wrote:
[...]
> > When I first read PCL (which was my introduction to Lisp) I thought
> > LOOP was really neato. Once I actually started using it for things that
> > weren't so simple, I began to really hate it. I think that having a
>
teration is a superb idea, but I don't
think LOOP is it.
That being said, there's a portable alternatives out there that I like
way better, and I still use LOOP for dashing stuff off one-liners at
the REPL.
Cheers,
Pillsy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i] for (aref i); this is something I periodically
consider doing.
Cheers,
Pillsy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gs in Python, too, so I'd
be surprised if this were a make-or-break issue for Pythonistas.
Cheers,
Pillsy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
han Python, and CLisp really blows its doors off.
Cheers, Pillsy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
