Nevermind, it was fixed. Thanks.
Pupeno wrote:
> Hello,
> I am experiencing a weird behavior that is driving me crazy. I have module
> called Sensors containing, among other things:
>
> class Manager:
> def getStatus(self):
> print "getStatus(self=%s)&qu
output of the method it calls).
- Why doesn't the SensorSingleton.getStatus() return the return value of
manager.getStatus(), it's a very straight forward call to it and return it.
Thank you.
--
Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://pupeno.com)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello,
Having A(unittest.TestCase) and B(A), the unittests framework seems not to
run A's test when testing B, right ?
If so, is there any way to 'fix' it ? that is, make all tests in A, also run
for B ?
Thanks.
--
Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://pupeno.com)
--
http://ma
.
--
Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://pupeno.com)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
For the record, the copy and paste fix seems to have worked, so far.
Pupeno wrote:
> Hello,
> I am doing some extreme use of optparse, that is, extending it as
> explained on
> http://docs.python.org/lib/optparse-other-reasons-to-extend-optparse.html
> I have subclassed OptionPa
.
--
Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://pupeno.com)
[1] That would be:
def _add_help_option(self):
self.add_option("-h", "--help",
action="help",
help=_("show this help message and
Laszlo Nagy wrote:
> Pupeno írta:
>> Hello,
>> I have a class called MyConfig, it is based on Python's
>> ConfigParser.ConfigParser.
>> It implements add_section(self, section), which is also implemented on
>> ConfigParser.ConfigParser, which I want to ca
g to do (other than calling the specific
class that happens to be the parent today) ?
Thanks.
--
Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://pupeno.com)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
