Hi All,
I am a devoted Emacs user and I write a lot in Python. However, I
never managed to get my Emacs configuration right for this purpose.
There were some discussions on this, but the threads that show if I
search the group are either old or not so relevant.
I need the following features:
0)
On Jan 15, 8:06 pm, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately the links [2], [3] and [4] are not given,
Luckily, there's Google :)
[2] Article about MRO: http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.3/mro/
[3] Descriptor HowTo: http://users.rcn.com/python/download/Descriptor.htm
[4
On Jan 14, 11:05 pm, thebjorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't remember if CLOS was changed to use C3 Linearization also, but
> the concept came from Dylan (http://www.webcom.com/haahr/dylan/
> linearization-oopsla96.html) and that's what is implemented in Python.
The Common Lisp ANSI standar
On Jan 14, 1:53 pm, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I really need to publish this one day or another, since these
> questions
> about super keeps coming out:
>
> http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~micheles/python/super.html
Thanks, Michele! Your essay was enlightening [2]. Specially if yo
On Jan 13, 3:31 pm, thebjorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> They do, except for when it comes to what super(..) returns. It isn't
> really an object in the sense that they're presented in the tutorial,
> but rather a sort of proxy to the methods in the ancestor classes of
> the concrete object (self
On Jan 13, 8:59 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:23:52 -0800, Richard Szopa wrote:
> > However, I am very surprised to learn that
>
> > super_object.__getattr__(name)(*args, **kwargs)
>
> > getattr(super_o
On Jan 12, 9:47 pm, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The same way you call any object's methods if you know it's name":
>
> getattr(super_object, name)(*args, **kwargs)
Thanks a lot for your answer!
However, I am very surprised to learn that
super_object.__getattr__(name)(*args, **kw
On Jan 12, 7:45 pm, Richard Szopa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doing anything (initially I wanted to do something like CLOS
> [1] :before and :end methods, but that turned out to be too
> difficult).
Erm, I meant :before and :after methods.
-- Richard
--
http://mail.pyt
Hello all,
I am playing around w/ Python's object system and decorators and I
decided to write (as an exercise) a decorator that (if applied to a
method) would call the superclass' method of the same name before
doing anything (initially I wanted to do something like CLOS
[1] :before and :end meth
