> yes i know it's related to search path, but i don't know how to set it in a
> practical way (beside hard coding).
> my concern is, if i want to create a custom module/library, i don't know
> what py file will import it and where the working directory should be.
Regarding where the current workin
> hi all,
> i have question on how to design a module structure.
> for example, i have 3 files.
> [somewhere]/main.py
> [somewhere]/myLib/Base/BaseA.py
> [somewhere]/myLib/ClassA.py
>
> .
> It's fine when i run main.py.
> however when i run ClassA.py individually, it would fail in import
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> What is
Just FYI -- the post you posted was in HTML -- you might want to avoid
this in the future. 99% of all posts to news groups are in text, not
html. Html is hard for everyone to read with normal news readers and not
usually of any extra value. It's also more of a se
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:49:05 -0800, Fuzzyman wrote:
> Couple of corrections - neither pypy nor starkiller are compilers.
> Starkiller isn't available yet and *may* be helpful in building
> compilers. Pyrex is an alternative language - a python/C hybrid that
> can be compiled.
>
> If you want to r
> I'd go further. It's not possible to force anyone to share, but the
> GPL aims to remove software from a system that instead aims to force
> people NOT to share.
Well said.
I do think the point is -- no one liscence fits all. The GPL
is a great tool for those that write software for the pu
> But the vision of what? Do we have clear, detailed, unambigous vision
> _of the process_ or just big ideological axes to grind? I'm afraid
> we're close to the latter situation - even though Python is remarkably
> different in this area than the "free software": clean, pragmatic,
> effective, fre
> Theoretically. Because even though the source code is available
> and free (like in beer as well as in speech) the work of
> programmers isn't cheap.
>
> This "free software" (not so much OSS) notion "but you can
> hire programmers to fix it" doesn't really happen in practice,
> at least not f
> Well, I programmed a little in MS Visual Studio 2003, and there you have
> Console apllication and Windows application (among others). Windows one is
> with buttons and other gadgets. So, I want to make applications that
> doesn't open console to display result, I want to display it into the
> me
> For managers of companies it's worse: the company makes
> VERY substantial investments into any technology it "marries",
> and that means big losses if it goes. Long-term stability
> of this technology in terms of "we're not going to be left out
> in cold alone with this technology to feed it" me
