I agree that some of Python is simple but the description of subprocess is certainly not.
I spent much of my working career using Fortran and TrueBasic on mainframes. I'd like programming to be more like holding a discussion to the computer in English instead of Sanscrit. Roger On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> wrote: > On 09Aug2015 10:55, rogerh...@gmail.com <rogerh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> But WOW! Python is described as an easy to learn language. I don't think >> so! >> > > The language itself is pretty compact and expressive. You also need to > gain some familarity with the standard library that comes with it. That has > lots of stuff. "subprocess" is part of the library. > > I'm not sure what metric you're using here for "easy to learn". > > Cheers, > Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> >
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
