Re: WxPython versus Tkinter.

Just trying to sift the BS from the real issues Heres a list of the issues relating to GUI toolkits Look Nativity-1 (as in apps look like other apps on the OS) Nativity-2 (as in uses 'bare-metal' and not a separate interpreter) Themeing (ttk) Efficiency (extra interpreter) Cross Platform Stabili

Re: WxPython versus Tkinter.

On Jan 24, 9:16 am, "Littlefield, Tyler" wrote: >  >PS: Be sure not to cause any segfaults because these linux folks can't >  >debug for shite! > Or maybe it is that the person fighting and throwing insults around like > candy at a parade can't code for shite. Or *gasp* the library that is > suppo

Re: WxPython versus Tkinter.

On Jan 23, 5:07 am, rantingrick wrote: > WxPython versus Tkinter (A code battle to the death!) > > by Rick Johnson. > > I have in many threads declared that Tkinter (and TclTk) is currently > --and has been for a decade-- the wrong choice for Python's stdlib > GUI. Throughout the 90's Tkinter was

Re: HTSQL 2.0 RC1 -- a Query Language for the Accidental Programmer

On Jan 22, 10:20 pm, Kirill Simonov wrote: > On 01/22/2011 12:25 AM, rusi wrote: > > > On Jan 22, 2:45 am, "Clark C. Evans"  wrote: > >> Kirill Simonov and myself would like to introduce HTSQL, a novel > >> approach to relational database ac

Re: HTSQL 2.0 RC1 -- a Query Language for the Accidental Programmer

On Jan 22, 2:45 am, "Clark C. Evans" wrote: > Kirill Simonov and myself would like to introduce HTSQL, a novel > approach to relational database access which is neither an ORM nor raw SQL. : > We're curious what you think. Thanks -- looks interesting. Given the claim htsql is higher level than s

Re: Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!

On Jan 20, 5:30 pm, Bill Felton wrote: > With some hesitation, I feel a need to jump in here.   This thread is now at 239 posts (and so I too hesitate...) The arguments for size, dependencies etc are what may be termed 'sys- ad' perspectives. The questions of 'it looks nice/ancient etc' are user

Re: Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!

On Jan 18, 4:13 am, rantingrick wrote: > On Jan 17, 4:47 pm, Terry Reedy wrote: > > > On 1/16/2011 11:20 PM, rantingrick wrote: > > > > Ok, try this... > > > >      http://juicereceiver.sourceforge.net/screenshots/index.php > > >      http://www.sensi.org/~ak/pyslsk/pyslsk6.png > > >      http://

Re: Added Python, WSGI to XAMPP

On Dec 10, 2:29 am, Gerry Reno wrote: > If you have any need of a portable LAMP stack, I just finished writing > some How-To's for getting Python, VirtualEnv and WSGI frameworks running > with XAMPP: > > How-To: Add VirtualEnv and Pylons (WSGI framework) to XAMPP >

Re: class browser

On Dec 8, 11:24 pm, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 13:18 +0530, Rustom Mody wrote: > > If I have a medium to large python code base to browse/study, what are > > the class browsers available? > > Monodevelop has good Python support which includes a working Python > class browse

Re: trace cmd line args in 2.7

On Dec 10, 10:53 am, rusi wrote: > Ive installed python 2.7 > And trace still ignores my ignore-module etc requests Is this a know bug with the trace module? I find it hard to believe that as traces naturally tend to get huge unless carefully trimmed -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/li

Re: Deprecation warnings (2.7 -> 3 )

On Dec 10, 9:17 pm, nn wrote: > On Dec 9, 10:15 pm, rusi wrote: > > > In trying to get from 2.x to 3 Terry suggested I use 2.7 with > > deprecation warnings > > > Heres the (first) set > > > DeprecationWarning: Overriding __eq__ blocks inheritance of __hash

Deprecation warnings (2.7 -> 3 )

In trying to get from 2.x to 3 Terry suggested I use 2.7 with deprecation warnings Heres the (first) set DeprecationWarning: Overriding __eq__ blocks inheritance of __hash__ in 3.x DeprecationWarning: callable() not supported in 3.x; use isinstance(x, collections.Callable) Is there one place/si

Re: trace cmd line args

On Dec 9, 10:37 pm, rusi wrote: > On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, Terry Reedy wrote: > > > > > On 12/9/2010 7:12 AM, rusi wrote: > > > > On Dec 9, 1:39 pm, Terry Reedy  wrote: > > >> On 12/9/2010 1:10 AM, rusi wrote: > > > >>> I am unable to get t

Re: trace cmd line args

On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 12/9/2010 7:12 AM, rusi wrote: > > > On Dec 9, 1:39 pm, Terry Reedy  wrote: > >> On 12/9/2010 1:10 AM, rusi wrote: > > >>> I am unable to get trace to not trace system modules. > > >> Try it with 3.2b1,

Re: trace cmd line args

On Dec 9, 1:39 pm, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 12/9/2010 1:10 AM, rusi wrote: > > > I am unable to get trace to not trace system modules. > > Try it with 3.2b1, just released. Multiple bugs were fixed in trace. > Some fixes might also be in recent 2.7.1 and 3.1.3. Not sure. >

trace cmd line args

I am unable to get trace to not trace system modules. I tried: $ python -m trace --listfuncs tt.py --ignore-module 'bdb' > tracefile $ python -m trace --listfuncs --ignore-dir /usr/lib/python2.6 tt.py > tracefile and many other combinations But anyhow my tracefile contains lines like this: file

<    5   6   7   8   9   10