Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Instead of tossing around the GzipDecoding code from one method to another
(which would in turn change the return value from those methods), I thought is
appropriate to do a change in parse_response itself, so that it verifies
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
This issue is not applicable to release31-maint.
--
resolution: - fixed
versions: -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8194
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:33:50PM +, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
Though msg104261 suggests this change be documented in NEWS.txt, it
doesn't appear to have made it.
Better late than never. I just added the NEWS in r87014 (py3k)
,r87015
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:51:35PM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
However, urllib.request.urlopen() works fine in this case, so
perhaps this advocates for deprecating the old stuff? Senthil?
Yes. It should be deprecated.. I created
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Give a try to this minor variation of the patch with tests added and let me
know your review comments.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19890/Issue3243-4.patch
___
Python tracker rep
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:06:25AM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
+try:
+ self.sock.sendall(data)
Indentation problem here.
I could notice it now. Shall fix it.
+if isinstance(data,str
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:56:56PM +, Xuanji Li wrote:
orsenthil: Hi, i don't quite understand why iter() needs to be
called explicitly on data? As I understand it, if data is an
iterable then you can use a for loop on it directly
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:08:26PM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
if not request.has_header('Content-length'):
if (not hasattr(data, '__read__') and
What is __read__ supposed to be?
I don't think is required. The previous 2.x version
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:19:10AM +, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:06:25AM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
+try:
+ self.sock.sendall(data)
Indentation problem here.
I could notice it now
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Updated patch after correcting the mistake (bytes vs str) in the previous one.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19900/Issue3243-6.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:08:55AM +, Xuanji Li wrote:
req = Request(http://example.com/;, )
That should be:
req = Request(http://example.com/;, b)
I updated some of those in the latest updated patch.
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:16:53AM +, Xuanji Li wrote:
And my version too...
+if hasattr(data, '__len__') and not len(data):
+request.add_unredirected_header('Content-length', '0')
This is very
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:20:05AM +, Xuanji Li wrote:
Actually I don't think you can go around changing test_urllib2.py,
they are after all regression tests... and surely some users will
send as data.
Think about it this way
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Glaring at my mistakes.
There was wrong examples in the test_urllib2 which I just corrected.
There were..
Expect for the difference in (it = iter(data) - Which I am seeking
Except
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ouch. My mistake. Had not realize then, that code that actually broke things
was merged in 2.6.x and it had to be fixed too. :(
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Xuanji, a wording which does convey the approximate meaning is fine. I think,
the Exception error messages will help the people based on the Context.
- Lets have the ValueError raised from the urllib/request.py. Changing it to
isinstance
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 05:48:20AM +, Éric Araujo wrote:
I’m not committing directly because I’d like feedback: Is the
wording okay for the beginning of the tutorial?
It seems fine and useful. Please go ahead.
--
nosy
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
xuanji, the issue you stumbled upon was just fixed by Raymond for the report
Issue10565.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3243
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r86861. Xavier, I noticed that pdb.py itself was not calling the
proper method. Added the tests to the patch. Thanks.
BTW, please provide patches against py3k as that is development version.
--
assignee: - orsenthil
nosy
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
r86862 - release31-maint and r86863 - release27-maint.
--
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10561
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
No problems when I downloaded and installed on Windows XP.
I scanned using the Symantec EndPoint protection and no threats found.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: jhylton - orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3243
___
___
Python
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
The transparent gzip Content-Encoding support should be done at the
http.client level code.
Before adding this feature, a question needs to be sorted out.
If we support the transparent gzip and wrap the file pointer to a
GzipFile
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Patch for py3k.
--
stage: unit test needed - patch review
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19811/issue1508475.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Boštjan, it is fixed. The change will reflect when the docs get served
from the updated version.
Also, Georg will take care of merging it to other branches.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
If you want to quickly solve this, do like this:
import urllib
import tarfile
tarfile.open(urllib.urlretrieve('http://plugins.supybot-fr.tk/GoodFrench.tar')[0],
mode='r:') # Works
The problem is tarfile is expecting a file-object
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Committed in r86750. Thank you!
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10441
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10442
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:44:21AM +, Dafydd Crosby wrote:
I created a patch that adds those two wishlist items. Given that
mouse support and the use of curses.flash() are missing from the
demo programs, I think it's a bit
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
I think, it is better that distutils.command.register and
distutils.command.upload use CRLF as the line terminator for header
values.
It just helps in many cases, we can safely side by this case, but not
relying LR or CR only may
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: facundobatista - orsenthil
nosy: -BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1675455
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10483
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:09:58PM +, Jeremy Thurgood wrote:
There are two separate things here: the URL and the filesystem path.
The bug is that the fragment and query parameters are stripped in
translate_path
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed this revision 86640.
- Even though this is an internal optimization,I don't think back-porting is a
good idea, because it changes the behavior of certain methods like send_header
and end_headers
- Added the Documentation and other
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:12:08PM +, Jeremy Thurgood wrote:
I see your point now, but I don't agree with it completely. It seems
reasonable to allow query parameters to specify things like sort
order for a directory listing or have
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 03:15:06PM +, R. David Murray wrote:
Senthil, I didn't clearly express my concern about
send_response_only. It doesn't look to me like, with buffering in
place, that it *should* write directly, it looks to me
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed it in r86676 (py3k), r86677 ( release31-maint) and
r86678(release27-maint).
Wes: I fixed it at the much higher level in the urlparse itself, so that the
fixed url is sent to the httplib.
In issue2464, John had pointed out
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
back-ported to release27-maint in r86554.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2244
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
I have doubts on the validity of this bug itself.
- First is, query and fragment are usually for the file being served from the
webserver, not on the directories. If there are characters such as '?' and '#'
in the directory names, which
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r86580 (py3k), r86581 and r86582.
--
components: +Library (Lib)
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10377
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
BaseHTTPServer documentation explains that Usually, this module isn’t used
directly, but is used as a basis for building functioning Web servers. Methods
are usually subclassed with desirable behaviors customized.
If you are using
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
What should it do? OP expected that it print the redirected url. I don't think
that's helpful by setting max_redirections to 0, when it can be achieved in
other ways.
Also, max_redirections is not exposed (as a parameter or arg
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r86514 (py3k) and r86515 (release31-maint).
--
assignee: - orsenthil
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9991
___
___
Python-bugs
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r86520 (py3k) and r86522 (release31-maint).
unquote happens at the first level inside Request class, _parse method.
Shall port to py2.7.
--
nosy: -BreamoreBoy
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
r86523(py3k) and r86524(release31-maint)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9991
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Revisiting this issue.
- Cookie: should contain name=value pairs
- Set-Cookie: header can contain a single word like 'secure'
The current design is along the same lines only.
In the original comment, the request had asked to document
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Did you attach the correct files? You mention about two programs in the
description, but you have attached only one file 'deadlock.py'.
Also, it does not fail on Python 2.7.1. Please try it on the latest
codeline from release27-maint too
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10399
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
It is 'attributes' instead of term 'members'. The term 'method' when it denotes
methods can be left as such.
--
assignee: d...@python - orsenthil
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - needs patch
type: - behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10403
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:32:03AM +, Adam Bielański wrote:
just accept ex:nil as well as nil and not try to analyze namespaces at all.
But even that seems specific to Java/ Apache Extension.
If it is, then it might go in as part
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - bquinlan
nosy: +bquinlan
stage: - patch review
versions: -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10432
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - duplicate
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10425
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
John, I was trying to find out what does rfc say on Client Ignoring the 30X
REDIRECT headers. There is no point made on Client's trying to ignore it,
instead it said that it should follow the Redirect and must not endlessly loop.
Setting
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - orsenthil
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10425
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
That's sad. The fix is very simple. We shall have it before 3.2 alpha4 or beta1.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9991
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the explanation, Éric. That helps.
- Backported QName tests in r86447 to release31-maint.
As for the logic of the fix, it follows like this:
If True and False:
#Doesn't go here
elif True:
# Goes here
vs
if True:
# Goes
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:20:45AM +, Łukasz Langa wrote:
You think wrong. Try it.
Okay, I get it. Coercing would be a bad idea in RawConfigParser
because there are cases where get method can have raw=True and
coercing would break
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
This is an invalid bug report at the moment. In fact, aged.
The redirection depends upon max_redirections and max_repeats together. Setting
it to 0 explicitly (inside the code) is not a good use case under any condition.
--
nosy
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r86450 (py3k). Will be back porting shortly.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5111
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
status: pending - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10116
___
___
Python
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
r86461 (release31-maint)
r86462 (release27-maint)
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5111
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:15:57PM +, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
cProfile.run(import time; time.sleep(1))
4 function calls in 1.012 CPU seconds
It is not the case that the profiled code uses 1 CPU seconds. It
spends
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:35:49AM +, Łukasz Langa wrote:
This is unfortunately a backwards compatibility concern. Originally
it wasn't made so that set() converts to string or accepts only
strings and when the developers realized
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hallvard, if it going be a rather huge diff, you may make it available at
http://bugs.python.org/review, so that it is easy for review.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
conn.close() was done in the finally method in r86228 by brian.curtin.
The other change in your patch in very minor space addition after comma. We can
leave it to place along with some other code change.
--
nosy: +brian.curtin
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
At first, I was worried if this simplification would cause any harm to
readability of the algorithm. Fortunately, it didn't.
Committed in r86357.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - committed/rejected
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r86348 for py3k and r86349 for release27-maint.
In release31-maint, I see that there are missing features, like support for
xml_declaration and default_namespace, which are however available in
release27-maint
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10318
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
jrodman2, in the socketserver TCPServer code you will find that
shutdown_request does a socket.SHUT_WR before calling close_request.
If the application or code in your description used shutdown_request, instead
of close_request would you
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed the wordings in r86296(py3k), r86297(release31-maint) and
r86298(release27-maint).
David, for the examples you mentioned, the first one's parsing logic follows
the explanation that is written. It is correct.
For the second example
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r86310. print was used in some examples following its mention, so a
simple introduction to it was okay. It is introduced properly further down in
the tutorial.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: - fixed
stage: needs patch
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10205
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6269
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
/py3k/Modules/readline.c: In function flex_complete:
/py3k/Modules/readline.c:877: error: on_completion undeclared (first use in
this function)
--
assignee: orsenthil
messages: 120376
nosy: orsenthil
priority: normal
severity
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
The problem was in py3k, due to a minor overlook in r85680.
Fixed in r86153.
--
components: +Build
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 3.2
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Not sure, why changed the resolution. It is an invalid bug report. You could
have resolved it by a little research or by asking around.
--
resolution: fixed - invalid
___
Python tracker rep
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
- Otherwise, it is not possible to distinguish between netloc and path
- components, and would the indistinguishable component would be classified
- as the path as in a relative URL.
+ If the netloc does not start
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in revision 85837.
--
assignee: - orsenthil
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10155
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9022
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: d...@python - orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10048
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Not an issue anymore as socket timeout at client is supposed to happen with the
connection is hung due to unresponsive host.
The original bug was raised py2.3. Closing it as out of date.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: - out
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1520831
___
___
Python
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4733
___
___
Python-bugs
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:57:17PM +, Georg Brandl wrote:
That's why I said to use testsetup directives -- they are not
visible in the HTML/PDF/... output, but used when running the tests.
Do you already have such a directive
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - orsenthil
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5111
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
The patch was fine and yes agree that preserving timestamp as an option is
useful in many situations.
Committed in r85720. Thanks.
--
assignee: - orsenthil
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: - accepted
stage: patch review - committed
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Looks like an interesting feature request. What are the packages or external
libraries which may rely on this and how do they deal with SocketCan support at
moment for their requirements? (That thread mentions several, but some details
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in revision 85630. When using fileno attribute of the file-descriptor,
the socket had to be in blocking mode.
Now the results are consistent.
This may resolve the other spurious test failures that were observed too
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
ixokai, A change made as part of issue10119 should have resolved this issue
too. Please let me know if this can be closed.
--
assignee: - orsenthil
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
type: - behavior
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Actually, this is not related to transient_internet call. Just that file handle
not behaving as expected due to some delays.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
The patch looks reasonable to me.
I was trying to find out why they got disabled after 2.5, but I don't see any
reason. (There was an issue open and it was closed for no reason). So, I think,
this should move forward, unless there is any
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 07:01:40PM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
$ ./python -Xa,b=c,d -Xe,f=g=h -c import sys; print(sys.xoptions)
{'a': True, 'b': 'c', 'e': True, 'd': True, 'f': 'g=h'}
Docs should be updated too. I see that the values could either be True
or a string? Would this be perceived
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
I think, the original docs *is* pretty intuitive. It says Duplicate the file
descriptor fd and build a socket object. No one will think that the this
method will close the original fd. Person using this method might of course,
explicitly
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Docs changed committed in revision 85514.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: - fixed
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
I would suggest to OP, to take it with python-help for the problem to be fixed.
It's raised on python26 as well. Highly unlikely that anything is wrong with
Python installation here. Marking it invalid and closing it.
--
nosy
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
So, I assume that we just leave it as such and close the issue.
I was thinking if anything needs to be updated for function __doc__ but even
there 'the duplicate' word is explained.
--
resolution: - invalid
stage: - committed
1301 - 1400 of 1774 matches
Mail list logo
