Re: Difference between ActivePython and Python.org

On 2005-12-14, S.Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Anyone knows the difference(s) between the Python binaries from > ActiveState and Python.org? If you want to re-distribute the ActivePython packages outside of your organization, you have to get permission from ActiveState.

Re: Ant (with Python extensions) good replacement for distutils?

On 2005-12-05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know distutils well but don't know anything about Ant except that it > is a build tool from Apache project. > > Could it possible be better or as good as distutils? > (There are extensions for Python.) Ant is... ugh. If you're doing

Re: pretty windows installer for py scripts

On 2005-09-08, Adriaan Renting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The elegant way to do installs on Windows would be by creating an MSI. > Microsoft provides (IIRC) a simple tool to create those (Orca), that's > free. Without the Installshield or Wise tools I think it would take > quite some effort thoug

Re: Encryption with Python?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Rubin wrote: > "Blake T. Garretson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I found a few modules out there, but they seem to be all but abandoned. >> Most seem to have died several years ago. The most promising package >> is A.M. Kuchling's Python Cryptography Tool

Re: build flow? SCons? AAP? process creation?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey guys, here's a little question. I'm looking for something like a > build system, where I can set up a bunch of jobs with dependencies, and > have them run in parallel. Ideally, I'd like a system where jobs can > be run in parallel, al

Re: Utah Python Users Group

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ivan Van Laningham wrote: > Hi All-- > > Matthew Thorley wrote: >> >> lugal wrote: >> > Is anyone aware if there's a Utah-based Python User Group? If not, does >> > any else from Utah have any interest in forming a Utah-based Python >> > User Group? >> > >> I'm in

Re: smtplib bug with Windows XP

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > thank Peter, elbert, for the suggestions. I hadn't thought of using > telnet to try to connect to the SMTP server. and when I do try, telnet > can't connect either, at least on port 25. On port 110, it has no > problem. So, perhaps the