On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:25:34 -0800, scattered wrote:
> On Nov 22, 9:45 am, Raffael Cavallaro
> wrote:
>> On 2010-11-22 08:12:27 -0500, markhanif...@gmail.com said:
>>
>> > All opinions are biased.
>>
>> All opinions show some bias. Not all opinions represent what is usually
>> called a "conflict
Most people capable of using their newsreaders probably killfiled this
guy a long time ago.
Would you, please, be so nice as to refrain from replying to his messages?
If you do that, we won't even notice that he posted anything.
Thanks,
Tamas
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:48:32 -0700, Kryno Bosman wr
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:14:01 -0700, bolega wrote:
> Please compare LISP and its virtues with other languages such as
> javascript, python etc.
Generally, it is advisable to cross-post questions like this to at
least 50 other language newsgroups. For example, you are not giving
Ruby users a fair
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:28:08 +0100, Richard Riley wrote:
> posts controversial but always interesting. His ELisp tutorial is far
> and away better than anything else out there for the programmer moving
> to Elisp IMO. He backs up his points with reasons and supportive
Programmers don't "move" to
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:57:35 -0800, Lew wrote:
> Xah Lee wrote:
>> If [yo]u would like to learn [the] [E]nglish lang[uage] and writing
>> insights from me, peruse:
>
> /Au contraire/, I was suggesting a higher standard for your posts.
Hi Lew,
It is no use. Xah has been posting irrelevant rants
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:32:24 +, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> See:
> http://arcfn.com/2008/07/why-your-favorite-programming-language-is-
unpopular.html
That was 404 for me, but
http://arcfn.com/2008/07/why-your-favorite-language-is-unpopular.html
works. Interesting, thanks for mentioning it.
Tamas
