Re: alias method definitions / syntactic sugar suggestion

2009-03-05 Thread Tennessee Leeuwenburg
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Chris Rebert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg > wrote: > > I'm not sure if this problem I face affects many other people, but I'll > just > > describe it and see what kind of feedback I get. > &

alias method definitions / syntactic sugar suggestion

2009-03-05 Thread Tennessee Leeuwenburg
ctic marker that the variable justAsFantastic points to a method. Comments appreciated! -- ---------- Tennessee Leeuwenburg http://myownhat.blogspot.com/ "Don't believe everything you think" -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: [python-advocacy] Need Help in Preparing for Study of Python by Forrester Research

2007-05-02 Thread Tennessee Leeuwenburg
I've read through the document. It seems basically okay, although highly web-oriented. There are still *some* desktop developers left in the world! I was a little disappointed not to see more on the community -- e.g. engagement of the community, activity in support fora, availability of books and

Re: [python-advocacy] Would You Write Python Articles or Screencasts for Money?

2007-04-24 Thread Tennessee Leeuwenburg
Firstly, let me put up my hand and say that I would be happy to write Python articles for cash. Now, on to business. I am already doing something similar with /The Python Papers/. As part of putting together each edition (especially the upcoming, bumper edition due out soon), I seek out authors,

Python Papers: Submission Deadline Imminent for Volume 2

2007-01-08 Thread Tennessee Leeuwenburg
Submission Deadline Imminent To those who have submitted content for The Python Papers, we salute you. To the rest, we will be accepting zero-hour submissions up until the time of publication. However, the closer the deadline gets, the less likely it

Re: The Python Papers Edition One

2006-11-22 Thread Tennessee Leeuwenburg
On 11/23/06, Stephen Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 3.) Can I have an HTML version? > > A) No, we like it pretty. > > > The interesting thing is, there's nothing in your layout or format that you > can't do with some nice standards-compliant HTML and CSS. It could look > identical as