Thats how common lisp specifies a vector.
Andreas, your link indicates that lisp is a Weakly typed language not
strong. Theres no compile time type semantics, at least in CommonLisp,
MacLisp, ZetaLisp or FranzLisp.
(setq foo #(1 2 3))
(setq foo 1)
(setq foo "Whatever")
Theres no type associate
Java or even C is more strongly typed than lisp or tcl which
dont really have a concept of a typed variable.
Lisp only does runtime type checking unless you do wierd
unnatural things.
I suppose ADA or Eiffel might have stronger typing than
java, but I dont know those languages.
I guess strong is
You're point being...?
I'm an old lisp hacker too, and lisp developed
objects too, because they're cool and useful (Flavors & CLOS).
Java has inner classes also, and nobody misses FLET & LABELS.
Limiting responsiblity and enhanced type safety, as well as
improved readablity are a win hands down
