[issue46752] Introduce task groups to asyncio and change task cancellation semantics

Change by Yves Duprat : -- nosy: +yduprat ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46752> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue46771] Add some form of cancel scopes

Change by Yves Duprat : -- nosy: +yduprat ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46771> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue43352] Add a Barrier object in asyncio lib

Yves Duprat added the comment: This last version includes the propositions, remarks from @asveltov and @eamanu This PR is always stuck, so could you please approve the 3 running workflows ? -- status: pending -> open ___ Python tracker <

[issue43352] Add a Barrier object in asyncio lib

Yves Duprat added the comment: An update was submitted on PR. Modified python files are: file lib/asyncio/locks.py file lib/test/test_asyncio/test_locks.py And related documentation files file Doc/library/asyncio-api-index.rst file Doc/library/asyncio-sync.rst Please, could

[issue43352] Add a Barrier object in asyncio lib

New submission from Yves Duprat : Add a synchronized primitive Barrier in asyncio, in order to be consistent with them we have for threading. Barrier object will have a similar design from that of threading lib. (May be we have to think about a backport ?) Initial discussion started here