On Feb 27, 1:38 pm, "Ziga Seilnacht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Martelli wrote:
> > On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Daniel Nogradi wrote:
>
> > > Hi Alex,
>
> > > I did another test, this time with python 2.4 on suse and things are
> > > worse than in the previous case (which was python 2.5 on
On Feb 27, 9:10 am, "Daniel Nogradi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
>
> > > I did another test, this time with python 2.4 on suse and things are
> > > worse than in the previous case (which was python 2.5 on fedora 3),
> > > ouput of 'python gmp_test.py' follows:
>
> > Interesting! gmpy
On Feb 25, 3:09 pm, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > gmpy itself is or should be pretty trivial to build on any platform
> > (and I'll always happily accept any fixes that make it better on any
> > specific platform, since it's easy to make them conditional s
On Feb 24, 12:25 am, Toby A Inkster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> aleaxit wrote:
> > If anybody who has easy access to Microsoft's MSVC++.NET (and is willing
> > to try building GMP 4.2 with/for it), or a PPC Mac with XCode installed
> > (possibly with MacOSX 10.3.
On Feb 23, 3:44 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> I can keep building gmpy for Windows. I actually use MINGW since
> getting GMP compiled under MSVC is "challanging". I should be able to
> build new binaries for Windows this weekend. And I would be happy to
> point everyone to a real release.
On Feb 23, 2:52 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Am I hallucinating? Didn't I see at least some version
> > of gmpy for Python 2.5 on SourceForge awhile back?
> > I distinctly remember thinking that I don't have to
> > direct people to your site, but SourceForge is not
> > showing anything beyond v
On Feb 23, 12:00 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> > > + gmpy is looking pretty unmaintained (dead) to me (newest update of
> > > cvs 10 months ago).
>
> I worked withAlex Martelli(gmpy's maintainer) to fix a bug found by
> mensanator. With Alex's permission, I released it as gmpy 1.04a. Alex
>
Alessandro Bottoni wrote:
...
> > - In college, I came to admire the Schaum's Outline book
> >approach--again heavy on problems and solutions! What's
> >the closest Python equivalent?
>
> Maybe this:
>
> Python Cookbook
> Alex Martelli, David Ascher
> O'Reilly
I'd rather s
One of my most popular talks is "re-learning Python" -- can be anywhere
between 1 and 4 hours, depending on level of detail -- it's all about
the changes 1.5.2 -> today's Python, why they came about and why you
would want to use them...
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
Glad to hear that my efforts to cover some of 2.3's release features in
a mostly-2.2 book were appreciated. I'm probably going to do the same
thing for the 2nd edition of the Nutshell: wait until 2.5 alpha's out
so I can mention _its_ feechurz in a mostly-2.4 book... meaning the 2nd
ed of the Nuts
John Salerno wrote:
...
> Just one more quick question: I'm basically learning programming for
> fun, and I'm concentrating on C# right now. Python seems interesting,
> but I was wondering if I should even bother. Would it supplement C# in
> any way, or can C# do everything Python can?
C# and P
11 matches
Mail list logo
