Ove Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bhunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi,
>
> > I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
> > for it to finish, and then look at its output. Now I want to spawn
> > the process separat
On Nov 26, 3:05 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bhunter schrieb:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 26, 1:50 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> bhunter schrieb:
>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I'
On Nov 26, 1:50 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bhunter schrieb:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
> > for it to finish, and then look at its output. Now I want to s
>
> This is just the way I do it...as I said, there are probably some
> other people in the group who will have other opinions. By the way,
> your statement "I was hoping not to have to avoid that" means that you
> hoped to use threading...which I think is contradictory to what you
> meant.
>
> Mik
> I've read that this sort of thing can be a pain. I'm sure someone will
> post and have other views though. I have had some success using
> Python's threading module though. There's a pretty good walkthrough
> here (it uses wxPython in its example):
>
> http://wiki.wxpython.org/LongRunningTasks
>
Hi,
I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
for it to finish, and then look at its output. Now I want to spawn
the process separately, later check to see if it's finished, and if it
is look at its output. I may want to send a signal at some point to
kill the proces
